Re: Plasma table gear reduction - motors
Posted by
turbulatordude
on 2004-12-28 08:41:34 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Leslie Watts"
<leswatts@a...> wrote:
But, it seems one of your earlier posts mentioned flat and large
diameter motors are bad and long skinny ones are good. That makes
sense as the flywheel effect from the large motor would get in the
way of quick response. Ditto cast iron timing pullies vs. plastic
ones.
I do have the idea that a DC motor is rated on a somewhat linear
curve. and that generally speaking, a 100 volt, 10hp 4,000 RPM motor
is also a 50volt, 5hp 2,000 RPM or 25 volt, 2.5hp 1,000 RPM motor.
so, generally speaking, I can make a prototype axis a few feet long
and test the motors I have with different gear ratios to see the
acceleration.
Dave
Dave
<leswatts@a...> wrote:
> Dave,motors
> Power is just torque times rpm. The motioneering software selected
> and displayed a torque curve showing the operating point was in therpm
> safe region.
>
> Although I did not list it, the optimum motors were in the range of
> 600W or so rated cont power. This occurs at max cont torque and max
> rpm.
>
> At the 3 to 5 reduction the motor will only be going a few hundred
> for the gantry speed I used. The power actually delivered will bebut
> only perhaps a tenth of what the selected motor is capable of. The
> voltage will similarly be much lower than rated.
>
> I know this may seem really sub optimal to use the motor this way,
> we are trying to optimise cost- not motor power utilization orefficiency.
>friction. That
> The only mechanical load that really consumes real power is
> isaccelerate the
> very low in your proposed machine. What we need is FORCE to
> movingback when
> mass... and in a regenrative servo system you actually get that
> youtorque
> deccelerate....it pumps up the supply cap voltage.
>
> So it turns out that the software selected motors capable of the
> requiredhave to
> can generate much more power if they were run at a high rpm.
>
> The smaller motors at the high ratios run at higher rpm, but they
> usesoftware
> more torque to fight their own rotor inertia. As you can see the
> foundabove
> NO practical motor that would give the selected machine performance
> 20:1.You can use
>
> Let's say you had a car that you wanted to be fast off the line.
> smaller and smaller motors with more and more gearing to get thesame
> torque.would
> At some point the time to wind up the smaller motors to high rpm
> actuallySorry for being so dense.
> be the limiting factor rather than the car's mass.
>
>
> Les
> Leslie M.Watts
> http://www.lmwatts.com
But, it seems one of your earlier posts mentioned flat and large
diameter motors are bad and long skinny ones are good. That makes
sense as the flywheel effect from the large motor would get in the
way of quick response. Ditto cast iron timing pullies vs. plastic
ones.
I do have the idea that a DC motor is rated on a somewhat linear
curve. and that generally speaking, a 100 volt, 10hp 4,000 RPM motor
is also a 50volt, 5hp 2,000 RPM or 25 volt, 2.5hp 1,000 RPM motor.
so, generally speaking, I can make a prototype axis a few feet long
and test the motors I have with different gear ratios to see the
acceleration.
Dave
Dave
Discussion Thread
turbulatordude
2004-12-19 10:30:23 UTC
Plasma table gear reduction
caudlet
2004-12-19 12:56:21 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Les Newell
2004-12-19 13:00:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Plasma table gear reduction
Leslie Watts
2004-12-19 13:01:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Plasma table gear reduction
Graham Stabler
2004-12-19 15:11:27 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
turbulatordude
2004-12-19 23:23:52 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
John Dammeyer
2004-12-20 01:08:47 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
turbulatordude
2004-12-20 01:41:38 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
R Rogers
2004-12-20 07:46:07 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Jon Elson
2004-12-20 07:56:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
turbulatordude
2004-12-20 09:13:36 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Roy J. Tellason
2004-12-20 10:13:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Leslie Watts
2004-12-20 10:48:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
turbulatordude
2004-12-20 11:20:15 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction - Motioneering
R Rogers
2004-12-20 11:33:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Les Newell
2004-12-20 13:25:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Larry Wright
2004-12-20 14:53:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
R Rogers
2004-12-20 15:53:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Leslie Watts
2004-12-20 19:22:08 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction - Motioneering
Leslie Watts
2004-12-20 22:34:17 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
turbulatordude
2004-12-20 23:22:22 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Les Newell
2004-12-21 01:42:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
metlmunchr
2004-12-21 11:19:34 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
turbulatordude
2004-12-21 11:47:11 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
John Meissner
2004-12-21 12:03:36 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Graham Stabler
2004-12-21 12:38:27 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Les Newell
2004-12-21 12:45:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
R Rogers
2004-12-21 13:04:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Leslie Watts
2004-12-21 14:57:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
turbulatordude
2004-12-21 18:58:40 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
nitewatchman5
2004-12-21 19:50:11 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Leslie Watts
2004-12-27 11:04:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
turbulatordude
2004-12-27 23:19:24 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Leslie Watts
2004-12-28 05:31:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
turbulatordude
2004-12-28 08:41:34 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction - motors
Leslie Watts
2004-12-28 09:52:22 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction - motors
turbulatordude
2004-12-28 10:59:57 UTC
Re: Plasma table - ramp speeds
Gary
2004-12-28 11:39:15 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction - motors
Leslie Watts
2004-12-28 15:24:38 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction - motors