CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Plasma table gear reduction - motors

on 2004-12-28 08:41:34 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Leslie Watts"
<leswatts@a...> wrote:
> Dave,
> Power is just torque times rpm. The motioneering software selected
motors
> and displayed a torque curve showing the operating point was in the
> safe region.
>
> Although I did not list it, the optimum motors were in the range of
> 600W or so rated cont power. This occurs at max cont torque and max
> rpm.
>
> At the 3 to 5 reduction the motor will only be going a few hundred
rpm
> for the gantry speed I used. The power actually delivered will be
> only perhaps a tenth of what the selected motor is capable of. The
> voltage will similarly be much lower than rated.
>
> I know this may seem really sub optimal to use the motor this way,
but
> we are trying to optimise cost- not motor power utilization or
efficiency.
>
> The only mechanical load that really consumes real power is
friction. That
> is
> very low in your proposed machine. What we need is FORCE to
accelerate the
> moving
> mass... and in a regenrative servo system you actually get that
back when
> you
> deccelerate....it pumps up the supply cap voltage.
>
> So it turns out that the software selected motors capable of the
torque
> required
> can generate much more power if they were run at a high rpm.
>
> The smaller motors at the high ratios run at higher rpm, but they
have to
> use
> more torque to fight their own rotor inertia. As you can see the
software
> found
> NO practical motor that would give the selected machine performance
above
> 20:1.
>
> Let's say you had a car that you wanted to be fast off the line.
You can use
> smaller and smaller motors with more and more gearing to get the
same
> torque.
> At some point the time to wind up the smaller motors to high rpm
would
> actually
> be the limiting factor rather than the car's mass.
>
>
> Les
> Leslie M.Watts
> http://www.lmwatts.com

Sorry for being so dense.

But, it seems one of your earlier posts mentioned flat and large
diameter motors are bad and long skinny ones are good. That makes
sense as the flywheel effect from the large motor would get in the
way of quick response. Ditto cast iron timing pullies vs. plastic
ones.

I do have the idea that a DC motor is rated on a somewhat linear
curve. and that generally speaking, a 100 volt, 10hp 4,000 RPM motor
is also a 50volt, 5hp 2,000 RPM or 25 volt, 2.5hp 1,000 RPM motor.

so, generally speaking, I can make a prototype axis a few feet long
and test the motors I have with different gear ratios to see the
acceleration.

Dave

Dave

Discussion Thread

turbulatordude 2004-12-19 10:30:23 UTC Plasma table gear reduction caudlet 2004-12-19 12:56:21 UTC Re: Plasma table gear reduction Les Newell 2004-12-19 13:00:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Plasma table gear reduction Leslie Watts 2004-12-19 13:01:13 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Plasma table gear reduction Graham Stabler 2004-12-19 15:11:27 UTC Re: Plasma table gear reduction turbulatordude 2004-12-19 23:23:52 UTC Re: Plasma table gear reduction John Dammeyer 2004-12-20 01:08:47 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction turbulatordude 2004-12-20 01:41:38 UTC Re: Plasma table gear reduction R Rogers 2004-12-20 07:46:07 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction Jon Elson 2004-12-20 07:56:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction turbulatordude 2004-12-20 09:13:36 UTC Re: Plasma table gear reduction Roy J. Tellason 2004-12-20 10:13:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction Leslie Watts 2004-12-20 10:48:52 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction turbulatordude 2004-12-20 11:20:15 UTC Re: Plasma table gear reduction - Motioneering R Rogers 2004-12-20 11:33:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction Les Newell 2004-12-20 13:25:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction Larry Wright 2004-12-20 14:53:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction R Rogers 2004-12-20 15:53:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction Leslie Watts 2004-12-20 19:22:08 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction - Motioneering Leslie Watts 2004-12-20 22:34:17 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction turbulatordude 2004-12-20 23:22:22 UTC Re: Plasma table gear reduction Les Newell 2004-12-21 01:42:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction metlmunchr 2004-12-21 11:19:34 UTC Re: Plasma table gear reduction turbulatordude 2004-12-21 11:47:11 UTC Re: Plasma table gear reduction John Meissner 2004-12-21 12:03:36 UTC Re: Plasma table gear reduction Graham Stabler 2004-12-21 12:38:27 UTC Re: Plasma table gear reduction Les Newell 2004-12-21 12:45:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction R Rogers 2004-12-21 13:04:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction Leslie Watts 2004-12-21 14:57:13 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction turbulatordude 2004-12-21 18:58:40 UTC Re: Plasma table gear reduction nitewatchman5 2004-12-21 19:50:11 UTC Re: Plasma table gear reduction Leslie Watts 2004-12-27 11:04:36 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction turbulatordude 2004-12-27 23:19:24 UTC Re: Plasma table gear reduction Leslie Watts 2004-12-28 05:31:28 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction turbulatordude 2004-12-28 08:41:34 UTC Re: Plasma table gear reduction - motors Leslie Watts 2004-12-28 09:52:22 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction - motors turbulatordude 2004-12-28 10:59:57 UTC Re: Plasma table - ramp speeds Gary 2004-12-28 11:39:15 UTC Re: Plasma table gear reduction - motors Leslie Watts 2004-12-28 15:24:38 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction - motors