RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Posted by
Leslie Watts
on 2004-12-28 05:31:28 UTC
Dave,
Power is just torque times rpm. The motioneering software selected motors
and displayed a torque curve showing the operating point was in the
safe region.
Although I did not list it, the optimum motors were in the range of
600W or so rated cont power. This occurs at max cont torque and max
rpm.
At the 3 to 5 reduction the motor will only be going a few hundred rpm
for the gantry speed I used. The power actually delivered will be
only perhaps a tenth of what the selected motor is capable of. The
voltage will similarly be much lower than rated.
I know this may seem really sub optimal to use the motor this way, but
we are trying to optimise cost- not motor power utilization or efficiency.
The only mechanical load that really consumes real power is friction. That
is
very low in your proposed machine. What we need is FORCE to accelerate the
moving
mass... and in a regenrative servo system you actually get that back when
you
deccelerate....it pumps up the supply cap voltage.
So it turns out that the software selected motors capable of the torque
required
can generate much more power if they were run at a high rpm.
The smaller motors at the high ratios run at higher rpm, but they have to
use
more torque to fight their own rotor inertia. As you can see the software
found
NO practical motor that would give the selected machine performance above
20:1.
Let's say you had a car that you wanted to be fast off the line. You can use
smaller and smaller motors with more and more gearing to get the same
torque.
At some point the time to wind up the smaller motors to high rpm would
actually
be the limiting factor rather than the car's mass.
Les
Leslie M.Watts
L M Watts Furniture
Tiger Georgia
(706) 212-0242
Main page:
http://www.lmwatts.com
Engineering:
http://www.lmwatts.com/shop.html
Cnc surplus for sale:
http://www.lmwatts.com/forsale.html
Carved signs:
http://www.lmwatts.com/signwp.html
-----Original Message-----
From: turbulatordude [mailto:dave_mucha@...]
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 2:19 AM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
<snip>
dumb question, but is that power into the drive ? or do you also
divide the power by the ratio to get the motor power needed ?
I see is that a 1,000 RPM motor is the place to start. that would
offer something between 200 and 300 inch per minute rapids.
Thanks for your efforts to guide me straight.
Dave
Addresses:
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
timg@...
Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@...
[Moderators]
URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.
http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner
Yahoo! Groups Links
Power is just torque times rpm. The motioneering software selected motors
and displayed a torque curve showing the operating point was in the
safe region.
Although I did not list it, the optimum motors were in the range of
600W or so rated cont power. This occurs at max cont torque and max
rpm.
At the 3 to 5 reduction the motor will only be going a few hundred rpm
for the gantry speed I used. The power actually delivered will be
only perhaps a tenth of what the selected motor is capable of. The
voltage will similarly be much lower than rated.
I know this may seem really sub optimal to use the motor this way, but
we are trying to optimise cost- not motor power utilization or efficiency.
The only mechanical load that really consumes real power is friction. That
is
very low in your proposed machine. What we need is FORCE to accelerate the
moving
mass... and in a regenrative servo system you actually get that back when
you
deccelerate....it pumps up the supply cap voltage.
So it turns out that the software selected motors capable of the torque
required
can generate much more power if they were run at a high rpm.
The smaller motors at the high ratios run at higher rpm, but they have to
use
more torque to fight their own rotor inertia. As you can see the software
found
NO practical motor that would give the selected machine performance above
20:1.
Let's say you had a car that you wanted to be fast off the line. You can use
smaller and smaller motors with more and more gearing to get the same
torque.
At some point the time to wind up the smaller motors to high rpm would
actually
be the limiting factor rather than the car's mass.
Les
Leslie M.Watts
L M Watts Furniture
Tiger Georgia
(706) 212-0242
Main page:
http://www.lmwatts.com
Engineering:
http://www.lmwatts.com/shop.html
Cnc surplus for sale:
http://www.lmwatts.com/forsale.html
Carved signs:
http://www.lmwatts.com/signwp.html
-----Original Message-----
From: turbulatordude [mailto:dave_mucha@...]
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 2:19 AM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
<snip>
> 3) 3:1 reduction drive with 1" diam timing pulley<snip>
> 250 in oz torque 0.1 oz in sec^2 rotor inertia
> So with the numbers I used you can see that there is a sweet spotat about
> 3:1 to 5:1 where the peak torque required is minimum and areasonable and
> typicalpower or
> rotor inertia gives a good impedance match.
>
> This is not anywhere near the point where the motor delivers best
> isdesign.
> most efficient. It is simply the point of best economy for your
>Thanks Les,
>
>
>
> Leslie M.Watts
> L M Watts Furniture
> http://www.lmwatts.com
dumb question, but is that power into the drive ? or do you also
divide the power by the ratio to get the motor power needed ?
I see is that a 1,000 RPM motor is the place to start. that would
offer something between 200 and 300 inch per minute rapids.
Thanks for your efforts to guide me straight.
Dave
Addresses:
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
timg@...
Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@...
[Moderators]
URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.
http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner
Yahoo! Groups Links
Discussion Thread
turbulatordude
2004-12-19 10:30:23 UTC
Plasma table gear reduction
caudlet
2004-12-19 12:56:21 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Les Newell
2004-12-19 13:00:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Plasma table gear reduction
Leslie Watts
2004-12-19 13:01:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Plasma table gear reduction
Graham Stabler
2004-12-19 15:11:27 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
turbulatordude
2004-12-19 23:23:52 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
John Dammeyer
2004-12-20 01:08:47 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
turbulatordude
2004-12-20 01:41:38 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
R Rogers
2004-12-20 07:46:07 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Jon Elson
2004-12-20 07:56:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
turbulatordude
2004-12-20 09:13:36 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Roy J. Tellason
2004-12-20 10:13:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Leslie Watts
2004-12-20 10:48:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
turbulatordude
2004-12-20 11:20:15 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction - Motioneering
R Rogers
2004-12-20 11:33:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Les Newell
2004-12-20 13:25:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Larry Wright
2004-12-20 14:53:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
R Rogers
2004-12-20 15:53:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Leslie Watts
2004-12-20 19:22:08 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction - Motioneering
Leslie Watts
2004-12-20 22:34:17 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
turbulatordude
2004-12-20 23:22:22 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Les Newell
2004-12-21 01:42:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
metlmunchr
2004-12-21 11:19:34 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
turbulatordude
2004-12-21 11:47:11 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
John Meissner
2004-12-21 12:03:36 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Graham Stabler
2004-12-21 12:38:27 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Les Newell
2004-12-21 12:45:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
R Rogers
2004-12-21 13:04:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Leslie Watts
2004-12-21 14:57:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
turbulatordude
2004-12-21 18:58:40 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
nitewatchman5
2004-12-21 19:50:11 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Leslie Watts
2004-12-27 11:04:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
turbulatordude
2004-12-27 23:19:24 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction
Leslie Watts
2004-12-28 05:31:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction
turbulatordude
2004-12-28 08:41:34 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction - motors
Leslie Watts
2004-12-28 09:52:22 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction - motors
turbulatordude
2004-12-28 10:59:57 UTC
Re: Plasma table - ramp speeds
Gary
2004-12-28 11:39:15 UTC
Re: Plasma table gear reduction - motors
Leslie Watts
2004-12-28 15:24:38 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Plasma table gear reduction - motors