Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this motor workable?

oops. I think I was comparing 55oz-in continuous to 44oz-in/amp...

I should be starting my own thinking process at the hand wheels on the
table/knee instead of at the motor. Assuming I change out my lead screws
to 4 or 5 tpi ballscrews is there a "suggested" torque requirement for the
screws on a b'port size machine? The knee would obviously have to have a
bigger motor or more reduction. Quick side question...is there any reason
to change the knee to a ball screw? Seems like there really isn't a
backlash issue on a knee.

>
> That particular motor has 55 oz-in continuous torque and it is also
> 6000 RPM. To get the power out of that servo you would need a
> minimum of 4-1 or 5.6 -1 reduction. More might be better, but after
> 5.6-1 the pulleys and belting become a problem. Assuming you have a
> 5TPI ballscrew 5.6-1 would give you 214 IPM rapids, that's fast. And
> you would have 308 oz-in continuous torque, plenty for a mill just
> under Bridgeport size.
>
> I think for that kind of money you should keep your eyes open for a
> servo with same torque but lower rpm…
>
> The servos Polaraligned found on ebay would be perfect for your mill.
> You could probably run them 2-1 or 2.5-1 and have fast rapids.
>
>> Here are the motor specs:
>>
>> Torque constant: 44oz-in/amp
>> Voltage constant: 32.5v/1000 rmp
>> Peak torque: 600 oz-in, or 37.5 in-lb
>> Nominal voltage: 40vdc
>> Maximum voltage: 60vdc
>> Demagnitization current: >20amps
>> Terminal resistance 2.60 ohm
>> Max rpm at 50vdc is about 1200 rpm
>> No-load current <.51 amp
>> armature inertia .09oz-in-sec^2
>
> Wally
>
>
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "vortec62" <fj62@s...> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Newbie here. I've been following along but I am still a little
> lost.
>>
>> I see lots of discussions about servos/$$$$. I starting to think
> my
>> CNC conversion project will be over budget before I even get
>> started...
>>
>>
>> I found this:
> http://www.servosystems.com/reliance_dcbrush_rdm103.htm
>>
>> It seems to have similar torque ratings that I have seen mentioned
> in
>> other posts. It has a high speed so could be used with reduction
> and
>> still have acceptable travel speeds(I think).
>>
>> FYI I have a JET JVM-830 mill that I would like to convert. It is
> a
>> little smaller that a regular bridgeport machine.
>
>
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
> timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@...
> [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it
> if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
> sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for
> OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
> DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>