CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Is this motor workable?

Posted by cnc_4_me
on 2005-02-04 20:07:46 UTC
> That makes sense, but what I want to know is if the 30/40lb-in
torque is the
> required input at the leadscrew.

Those numbers are the motor torque...Then it is reduced 2-1 or so,
then inputed to the ballscrew..So with 2-1, ballscrew will see 60 to
80 lb-in

Wally



--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "FJ62" <fj62@s...> wrote:
> That makes sense, but what I want to know is if the 30/40lb-in
torque is the
> required input at the leadscrew. i.e. with a 2:1 ratio do I need
15/20lb-in
> motors to get 30/40 at the screw or do I need 30/40 motors to get
60/80 at
> the screw?
> Thanks,
> Vortec62
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cnc_4_me [mailto:cnc4me@g...]
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 6:28 PM
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this motor workable?
>
>
>
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "FJ62" <fj62@s...> wrote:
> >
> > Are these numbers for a 1:1 ratio?
> >
> >
> > >Well many bridgeport retrofits are using 30lb-in or so servos for
> x
> > >and y and 40lb-in or so on the knee...But there is a lot of
> confusion
> > >on this spec as to if it is continuous or not...
> >
> > >Wally
>
>
> Most people use a 2-1 or 2.5-1 ratio....Depends on your servo
> rpm...You want to use most of the servos rpm range to get the most
> power out of it...
>
> Wally

Discussion Thread

vortec62 2005-02-04 13:21:18 UTC Is this motor workable? cnc_4_me 2005-02-04 14:09:05 UTC Re: Is this motor workable? Polaraligned 2005-02-04 14:39:29 UTC Re: Is this motor workable? Dan Mauch 2005-02-04 15:08:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this motor workable? fj62@s... 2005-02-04 15:15:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this motor workable? cnc_4_me 2005-02-04 15:43:15 UTC Re: Is this motor workable? R Rogers 2005-02-04 15:50:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this motor workable? cnc_4_me 2005-02-04 16:37:55 UTC Re: Is this motor workable? R Rogers 2005-02-04 16:59:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this motor workable? FJ62 2005-02-04 18:16:39 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this motor workable? cnc_4_me 2005-02-04 18:28:13 UTC Re: Is this motor workable? FJ62 2005-02-04 18:38:07 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this motor workable? Jon Elson 2005-02-04 19:59:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this motor workable? FJ62 2005-02-04 20:00:45 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this motor workable? cnc_4_me 2005-02-04 20:07:46 UTC Re: Is this motor workable? FJ62 2005-02-04 20:18:53 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this motor workable? FJ62 2005-02-04 20:22:25 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this motor workable? Stephen Wille Padnos 2005-02-04 22:02:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this motor workable? JanRwl@A... 2005-02-04 22:11:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this motor workable? braidmeister 2005-02-04 23:25:37 UTC Re: Is this motor workable? Polaraligned 2005-02-05 05:12:08 UTC Re: Is this motor workable? Stephen Wille Padnos 2005-02-05 06:41:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this motor workable? Stephen Wille Padnos 2005-02-05 08:00:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this motor workable? cnc_4_me 2005-02-05 11:22:13 UTC Re: Is this motor workable? Stephen Wille Padnos 2005-02-05 11:27:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this motor workable? Jon Elson 2005-02-05 15:41:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this motor workable? Polaraligned 2005-02-06 05:31:33 UTC Re: Is this motor workable? Les Newell 2005-02-06 06:02:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this motor workable?