Rack and Pinion
Posted by
turbulatordude
on 2005-04-16 06:00:04 UTC
Hi all,
I am probably missing something very simple in this.
A spur gear has a unit value as the rack with a pitch diameter
value of 1 inch. ie: a 12 pitch rack matches a 12 tooth gear when
the pitch diameter of the gear is 1 inch.
This then means the linear movement equals Pi for one revolution of
the gear.
Pi does not fit very well into any gear ratios or stepper or encoder
ranges.
How then, does one get a 4 foot axis without some accumulated error ?
I can understand accept the table and machine will probably be worse,
but theoretically, the best I get is a little over 1 thou over 72
inches. ( what did you say?? shut up and quit complaining over 1
thou ?)
I just don't want to use two jackshafts with 4 timing gears to get
this theoretical accuracy.
Am I missing something simple ?
I've been looking at 12 and 16 pitch as the rack and gear width seem
to be good. Higher pitch seems to be much thiner, maybe too thin ?
I do know the larger plasma table makers use much finer pitch, but
special order racks to get the wide face contact.
Dave
I am probably missing something very simple in this.
A spur gear has a unit value as the rack with a pitch diameter
value of 1 inch. ie: a 12 pitch rack matches a 12 tooth gear when
the pitch diameter of the gear is 1 inch.
This then means the linear movement equals Pi for one revolution of
the gear.
Pi does not fit very well into any gear ratios or stepper or encoder
ranges.
How then, does one get a 4 foot axis without some accumulated error ?
I can understand accept the table and machine will probably be worse,
but theoretically, the best I get is a little over 1 thou over 72
inches. ( what did you say?? shut up and quit complaining over 1
thou ?)
I just don't want to use two jackshafts with 4 timing gears to get
this theoretical accuracy.
Am I missing something simple ?
I've been looking at 12 and 16 pitch as the rack and gear width seem
to be good. Higher pitch seems to be much thiner, maybe too thin ?
I do know the larger plasma table makers use much finer pitch, but
special order racks to get the wide face contact.
Dave
Discussion Thread
turbulatordude
2005-04-16 06:00:04 UTC
Rack and Pinion
R Rogers
2005-04-16 06:21:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rack and Pinion
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-04-16 06:38:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rack and Pinion
turbulatordude
2005-04-16 07:14:50 UTC
Re: Rack and Pinion
turbulatordude
2005-04-16 07:18:12 UTC
Re: Rack and Pinion
Abby Katt
2005-04-16 07:39:38 UTC
Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
ballendo
2005-04-16 07:47:39 UTC
DIY-CNC Machine reality 101 was Re: Rack and Pinion
Abby Katt
2005-04-16 07:51:11 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
cdmurphy_2000
2005-04-16 08:23:34 UTC
Re: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
Jon Elson
2005-04-16 09:11:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
Roy J. Tellason
2005-04-16 09:41:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
Hugh Prescott
2005-04-16 10:10:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
D Cranston
2005-04-16 10:23:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
Ron Kline
2005-04-16 10:45:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
R Rogers
2005-04-16 11:03:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
JanRwl@A...
2005-04-16 11:07:09 UTC
Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
Abby Katt
2005-04-16 13:34:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
JanRwl@A...
2005-04-16 14:06:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
JanRwl@A...
2005-04-16 15:19:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RE: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
Russ Waters
2005-04-16 16:16:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: RE: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
Jon Elson
2005-04-16 22:59:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
apaulsalerno
2005-04-17 17:59:12 UTC
Re: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
Lloyd Leung
2005-04-17 18:14:19 UTC
RE: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
Pete Brown (YahooGroups)
2005-04-17 18:23:57 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
Andrey Lipavsky
2005-04-17 18:26:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
JanRwl@A...
2005-04-17 22:33:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
Jon Elson
2005-04-17 22:56:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
JanRwl@A...
2005-04-17 23:58:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
turbulatordude
2005-04-18 06:10:07 UTC
Re: Rack and Pinion - Where to buy ?
cnc_4_me
2005-04-18 08:25:26 UTC
Re: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
Pete Brown (YahooGroups)
2005-04-18 08:31:57 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
Ron Kline
2005-04-18 09:34:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
Jon Elson
2005-04-18 10:04:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
cnc_4_me
2005-04-18 10:35:43 UTC
Re: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
Jon Elson
2005-04-18 19:36:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
apaulsalerno
2005-04-18 21:36:06 UTC
Re: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
cnc_4_me
2005-04-20 20:50:40 UTC
Re: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
Jon Elson
2005-04-20 22:45:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cheap 56,000RPM milling upgrade (not a dremel :)
Bill P @ ...
2005-04-23 14:33:18 UTC
Rebuilt 3HP Perske on eBay, was: Cheap 56K rpm upgrade
Brian
2005-04-23 15:33:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rebuilt 3HP Perske on eBay, was: Cheap 56K rpm upgrade
JanRwl@A...
2005-04-23 15:53:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rebuilt 3HP Perske on eBay, was: Cheap 56K rpm upgrade
Jon Elson
2005-04-23 20:24:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rebuilt 3HP Perske on eBay, was: Cheap 56K rpm upgrade
JanRwl@A...
2005-04-23 22:34:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rebuilt 3HP Perske on eBay, was: Cheap 56K rpm upgrade
Dave Fisher
2005-04-24 02:04:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rebuilt 3HP Perske on eBay, was: Cheap 56K rpm upgrade