RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: which OS ? XP or 2000 ?

RAM is important. If you boosted up to 1GB on your 733, I think you'd find
the performance similar between W2K and XP.



_____

From: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Wayne Weedon
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 2:20 PM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: which OS ? XP or 2000 ?



Mark Vaughan wrote:

> As far as I know Dave that's about correct.
>
> In the UK when we are offered cheap PC's it's anybodies guess what you

get,

> and one processor at 1GHz isn't the same as another.
>
> I use a P4 3GHz with 1GB of Ram for mach because I was lucky enough to

have

> one spare, so am not really qualified to say how much lower you can cut
> this.
>
> I would have thought 1.7GHz of most would be adequate, but for instance

many

> laptops have loads of problems, some have problems with the motherboard
> bias, could be them could be the motherboard, as soon as you think you've
> got it nailed, something might rear it's head.

I find that W2k runs quite a bit faster on similar hardware than XP.
It's probably not quite so bogged down with added value extras.

My VMC runs at 35kHz on a lowly 733MHz Celeron (256Mb ram) with W2K Pro
without any service packs, just a base install straight off the CD.
Add service pack 4 and it's pretty useless.

If you are using external motion controllers it ought to run on much less.

Wayne....

--
----------------------------------------------------------
Wayne M Weedon Email: wayne@fdos-design. <mailto:wayne%40fdos-design.com>
com
Fdos Design Poole UK
Tel +44-1202-677025 Fax +44-1202-770515 Mobile: 07774 439915

Specialists in small batch & Production Mechanical/Electrical Engineering
----------------------------------------------------------





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]