Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linux CNC Control program
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2009-02-27 10:36:41 UTC
Doug Pollard wrote:
load the correct kernel and associated files, and then boot that kernel.
One major headache with this approach is then Ubuntu will constantly be
barraging you with "an update is available" messages, and if you allow
the update to happen, it will replace your kernel.
Once the kernel and kernel symbol table is loaded, you can compile and
link EMC to it. But, then there is no reason to ever need a NON-RT
kernel, or at least I can't think of one. My company web server is
running an EMC2 version of Ubuntu 8.04, with a ton of software on it.
Jon
> Wreno Wynne wrote:Actually, you don't need a separate partition. All you'd need is to
>
>> Michael,
>>
>> Thanks for the explanation. That is kind of what I was planning - or a
>> dedicated CPU - anyway, once I get the hardware up and running.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Wreno
>>
>> Michael Fagan wrote:
>>
>>> Wreno,
>>> Note that EMC2 runs under a different version of the Ubuntu OS than
>>> would normally be used for typical computing. If you were running it
>>> for motion control, you'd want to add a separate partition with their
>>> version. Notably, their version has several changes to allow
>>> real-time operation where even normal Linux would fail.
>>>
>>>
load the correct kernel and associated files, and then boot that kernel.
One major headache with this approach is then Ubuntu will constantly be
barraging you with "an update is available" messages, and if you allow
the update to happen, it will replace your kernel.
Once the kernel and kernel symbol table is loaded, you can compile and
link EMC to it. But, then there is no reason to ever need a NON-RT
kernel, or at least I can't think of one. My company web server is
running an EMC2 version of Ubuntu 8.04, with a ton of software on it.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Jan Rowland
2009-02-18 22:08:39 UTC
DOS and/or GWBASIC control of LPT-1
Lester Caine
2009-02-19 00:27:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DOS and/or GWBASIC control of LPT-1
Tony Smith
2009-02-19 02:59:23 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DOS and/or GWBASIC control of LPT-1
Chris Brown
2009-02-19 03:24:46 UTC
Re: DOS and/or GWBASIC control of LPT-1
Jeff Demand
2009-02-19 07:21:57 UTC
Re: DOS and/or GWBASIC control of LPT-1
Denis Casserly
2009-02-20 18:42:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DOS and/or GWBASIC control of LPT-1
Denis Casserly
2009-02-20 18:47:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DOS and/or GWBASIC control of LPT-1
Lou Jackson
2009-02-21 00:39:11 UTC
Re: DOS and/or GWBASIC control of LPT-1
Wreno Wynne
2009-02-22 21:54:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DOS and/or GWBASIC control of LPT-1
Michael Fagan
2009-02-22 22:04:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DOS and/or GWBASIC control of LPT-1
Roland Jollivet
2009-02-23 00:12:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DOS and/or GWBASIC control of LPT-1
David Speck
2009-02-23 14:27:17 UTC
Linux CNC Control program
Wreno Wynne
2009-02-24 03:18:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DOS and/or GWBASIC control of LPT-1
Wreno Wynne
2009-02-24 03:29:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linux CNC Control program
Michael Fagan
2009-02-24 04:23:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linux CNC Control program
Wreno Wynne
2009-02-24 04:52:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linux CNC Control program
Gaston Gagnon
2009-02-24 09:11:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linux CNC Control program
Brian Worth
2009-02-24 17:00:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linux CNC Control program
Dave Halliday
2009-02-24 20:43:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linux CNC Control program + Great set of Windows disk utilities
Gaston Gagnon
2009-02-25 06:25:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linux CNC Control program + Great set of Windows disk utilities
Dave Halliday
2009-02-25 22:52:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linux CNC Control program + Great set of Windows disk utilities
Doug Pollard
2009-02-27 00:02:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linux CNC Control program
Gaston Gagnon
2009-02-27 00:02:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linux CNC Control program
Jon Elson
2009-02-27 10:36:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linux CNC Control program