CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?

Posted by Ron Ginger
on 2000-08-23 05:49:27 UTC
ptengin@... wrote:
>
> There are a lot of free storage places that one can upload files to. Most
> are designed to be used by an individual or organization. I cannot see why
> one could not upload stuff to such a site and share the password to all.
> There is Driveway.com, many others. We could share but not be standing
> directly on the groups turf. Not all of us have a hunk of disk space hung on
> the net. A neat solution?

I am misisng something here- isnt this exactly what we have with
egroups? A free service, a place to post files that members can share,
a way to discuss those files. Why use anything else?

As to not wanting a post like the gecko manaul, if you dont want to read
it, dont. He did not post the manual to the list so we all had to
download it, he simply posted a short note that said the doc was there
to read.

I agree that any list member with material usefull to this group should
feel free to post it to the egroups server. I have no opposition to
commercial material if its about CAD, CAM, EDM or DRO.

ron

Discussion Thread

mgrady 2000-08-22 22:59:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list? wanliker@a... 2000-08-22 23:54:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list? Ron Ginger 2000-08-23 05:49:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list? Ron Ginger 2000-08-23 06:19:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list? Art Fenerty 2000-08-23 08:08:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list? Tim Goldstein 2000-08-23 09:06:25 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list? ptengin@a... 2000-08-23 16:35:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list? Mariss Freimanis 2000-08-23 18:00:15 UTC Regarding the controversy Tim Goldstein 2000-08-23 18:08:33 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list? Tim Goldstein 2000-08-23 18:55:48 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy diazden 2000-08-23 20:43:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy wanliker@a... 2000-08-23 21:25:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy hans 2000-08-23 21:30:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy James Cullins 2000-08-23 21:44:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy Mariss Freimanis 2000-08-23 22:21:43 UTC Re: Regarding the controversy John Craddock 2000-08-23 22:45:44 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy ballendo@y... 2000-08-24 00:30:27 UTC Re: Regarding the controversy