Regarding the controversy
Posted by
Mariss Freimanis
on 2000-08-23 18:00:15 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com, ptengin@a... wrote:
I apologize for the controversy this is causing. I will remove the
manual, delete any reference to my company and repost it if I have
the time tonite. Tomorrow at 6AM my family and I are off to Kauai
till Sept 5 and I am very pressed for time.
I simply posted the manual as a service for those that were
interested in the continuing development of this drive. I felt uneasy
about doing so for fear the purpose would be misconstrued.
I have an addendum to the manual covering the pulse multiplier. I got
the boards in today and got the first one going, but removing the
manual and editing it has precedence.
Mariss
> In a message dated 08/23/2000 2:51:23 AM Hawaiian Standard Time,share,
> ginger@s... writes:
>
> << I am misisng something here- isnt this exactly what we have with
> egroups? A free service, a place to post files that members can
> a way to discuss those files. Why use anything else?reduce the
>
> >>
> Ron,
>
> I believe the reason for restricting attachments to posts was to
> groups "liability" in case of virus infections etc. I think thefiles being
> dropped into the file area are restricted by our "group charter". Iobstructions in
> personally have no problem with it, however, I will go around
> the road to get somewhere. How and where do you draw the line atwhat is Spam
> or other undesirable posts? I just suggested a way to get aroundthe
> objections some may raise. We don't need to step on toes no matterhow
> trivial if there are easy ways around it....Hi,
>
> Peter
> THRD, Inc.
I apologize for the controversy this is causing. I will remove the
manual, delete any reference to my company and repost it if I have
the time tonite. Tomorrow at 6AM my family and I are off to Kauai
till Sept 5 and I am very pressed for time.
I simply posted the manual as a service for those that were
interested in the continuing development of this drive. I felt uneasy
about doing so for fear the purpose would be misconstrued.
I have an addendum to the manual covering the pulse multiplier. I got
the boards in today and got the first one going, but removing the
manual and editing it has precedence.
Mariss
Discussion Thread
mgrady
2000-08-22 22:59:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
wanliker@a...
2000-08-22 23:54:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Ron Ginger
2000-08-23 05:49:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Ron Ginger
2000-08-23 06:19:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Art Fenerty
2000-08-23 08:08:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-23 09:06:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
ptengin@a...
2000-08-23 16:35:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Mariss Freimanis
2000-08-23 18:00:15 UTC
Regarding the controversy
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-23 18:08:33 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-23 18:55:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
diazden
2000-08-23 20:43:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
wanliker@a...
2000-08-23 21:25:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
hans
2000-08-23 21:30:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
James Cullins
2000-08-23 21:44:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
Mariss Freimanis
2000-08-23 22:21:43 UTC
Re: Regarding the controversy
John Craddock
2000-08-23 22:45:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
ballendo@y...
2000-08-24 00:30:27 UTC
Re: Regarding the controversy