Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
Posted by
James Cullins
on 2000-08-23 21:44:34 UTC
Please do not remove the file. All your help has been great.
Jim Cullins
Jim Cullins
----- Original Message -----
From: <wanliker@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com>; <geckohall@...>
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 11:25 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
> In a message dated 8/23/00 7:36:46 PM Mountain Daylight Time,
> geckohall@... writes:
>
> <<
> I apologize for the controversy this is causing. I will remove the
> manual, delete any reference to my company and repost it if I have
> the time tonite. Tomorrow at 6AM my family and I are off to Kauai
> till Sept 5 and I am very pressed for time.
> >>
> Please don't remove the file, and additionally please don't leave
the list.
> Your putting the post in our files section was with my prior
permission, and
> is within the guidelines that members have expressed that they
wanted.
> I have not seen any abuses to the list made by you, in your posts,
or in
> making the file available to the list.
> I am personally looking forward to seeing more information from you,
as well
> as others on this list.
> The list is doing exactly what I wanted it to do. Making
information to
> people that are interested in CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO to all that desire it.
the
> list has been very open in the past and I really try to keep the
list Mommy
> stuff to a minimum.
> I also feel that others have the right to post a question, but once
they and
> the list are advised what the policy is, then I hope that they will
accept
> that decision.
> I have not, nor am I going to set up a do or die set of rules.
Occasionally
> we will have to modify the direction that we are heading in, but I
hope that
> is with the list members guidance.
> Please understand that this list has been one of the best that I
have ever
> read, and that is the truth, not because I was lucky enough to start
it.
> I have received private mail saying the same thing about the
posting, it is
> acceptable, and in most cases was highly desirable.
> bill
> List Owner, manager, and flunky
> List Mommy
>
>
> -------------------------- eGroups
Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
> Find long lost high school friends:
> http://click.egroups.com/1/8016/4/_/423600/_/967091154/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
-_->
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> bill,
> List Manager
>
>
Discussion Thread
mgrady
2000-08-22 22:59:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
wanliker@a...
2000-08-22 23:54:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Ron Ginger
2000-08-23 05:49:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Ron Ginger
2000-08-23 06:19:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Art Fenerty
2000-08-23 08:08:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-23 09:06:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
ptengin@a...
2000-08-23 16:35:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Mariss Freimanis
2000-08-23 18:00:15 UTC
Regarding the controversy
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-23 18:08:33 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-23 18:55:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
diazden
2000-08-23 20:43:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
wanliker@a...
2000-08-23 21:25:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
hans
2000-08-23 21:30:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
James Cullins
2000-08-23 21:44:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
Mariss Freimanis
2000-08-23 22:21:43 UTC
Re: Regarding the controversy
John Craddock
2000-08-23 22:45:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
ballendo@y...
2000-08-24 00:30:27 UTC
Re: Regarding the controversy