CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Regarding the controversy

on 2000-08-23 22:21:43 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com, wanliker@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 8/23/00 7:36:46 PM Mountain Daylight Time,

> Please don't remove the file, and additionally please don't leave
the list.
> Your putting the post in our files section was with my prior
permission, and
> is within the guidelines that members have expressed that they
wanted.
> I have not seen any abuses to the list made by you, in your posts,
or in
> making the file available to the list.
> I am personally looking forward to seeing more information from
you, as well
> as others on this list.
> The list is doing exactly what I wanted it to do. Making
information to
> people that are interested in CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO to all that desire
it. the
> list has been very open in the past and I really try to keep the
list Mommy
> stuff to a minimum.
> I also feel that others have the right to post a question, but once
they and
> the list are advised what the policy is, then I hope that they will
accept
> that decision.
> I have not, nor am I going to set up a do or die set of rules.
Occasionally
> we will have to modify the direction that we are heading in, but I
hope that
> is with the list members guidance.
> Please understand that this list has been one of the best that I
have ever
> read, and that is the truth, not because I was lucky enough to
start it.
> I have received private mail saying the same thing about the
posting, it is
> acceptable, and in most cases was highly desirable.
> bill
> List Owner, manager, and flunky
> List Mommy

Hi,

I am not leaving the list or anything like that. All I did was remove
the manual to delete any reference to my company. I understand the
objections some might have to advertising, this was inadvertent on my
part. I cut corners and posted a manual I already had in .pdf format.
What I am going to do is go back to the original Word document,
delete the offending sections, then convert it back to a .pdf. I hope
this a compromise that will satisfy everyone. Regrettably I have run
out of time tonite and will have to do it when I return.

It has been my privelege to meet and interact with the many
knowlegable people on this list. Your kind words, time and helpful
suggestions have given me many ideas on how I might perfect my drives.

My obligation in return is to not offend or cause dissention by my
actions. It is in that spirit I removed my posting. It will be back
and improved when time permits after September 5.

Aloha
Mariss

Discussion Thread

mgrady 2000-08-22 22:59:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list? wanliker@a... 2000-08-22 23:54:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list? Ron Ginger 2000-08-23 05:49:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list? Ron Ginger 2000-08-23 06:19:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list? Art Fenerty 2000-08-23 08:08:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list? Tim Goldstein 2000-08-23 09:06:25 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list? ptengin@a... 2000-08-23 16:35:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list? Mariss Freimanis 2000-08-23 18:00:15 UTC Regarding the controversy Tim Goldstein 2000-08-23 18:08:33 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list? Tim Goldstein 2000-08-23 18:55:48 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy diazden 2000-08-23 20:43:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy wanliker@a... 2000-08-23 21:25:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy hans 2000-08-23 21:30:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy James Cullins 2000-08-23 21:44:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy Mariss Freimanis 2000-08-23 22:21:43 UTC Re: Regarding the controversy John Craddock 2000-08-23 22:45:44 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy ballendo@y... 2000-08-24 00:30:27 UTC Re: Regarding the controversy