Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
Posted by
diazden
on 2000-08-23 20:43:56 UTC
Mariss;
please dont do it I believe that you are a great asset to this list, altough the one that have to say that is the list owner
regards and thankyou
mariano
Mariss Freimanis wrote:
please dont do it I believe that you are a great asset to this list, altough the one that have to say that is the list owner
regards and thankyou
mariano
Mariss Freimanis wrote:
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com, ptengin@a... wrote:
> > In a message dated 08/23/2000 2:51:23 AM Hawaiian Standard Time,
> > ginger@s... writes:
> >
> > << I am misisng something here- isnt this exactly what we have with
> > egroups? A free service, a place to post files that members can
> share,
> > a way to discuss those files. Why use anything else?
> >
> > >>
> > Ron,
> >
> > I believe the reason for restricting attachments to posts was to
> reduce the
> > groups "liability" in case of virus infections etc. I think the
> files being
> > dropped into the file area are restricted by our "group charter". I
> > personally have no problem with it, however, I will go around
> obstructions in
> > the road to get somewhere. How and where do you draw the line at
> what is Spam
> > or other undesirable posts? I just suggested a way to get around
> the
> > objections some may raise. We don't need to step on toes no matter
> how
> > trivial if there are easy ways around it....
> >
> > Peter
> > THRD, Inc.
>
> Hi,
>
> I apologize for the controversy this is causing. I will remove the
> manual, delete any reference to my company and repost it if I have
> the time tonite. Tomorrow at 6AM my family and I are off to Kauai
> till Sept 5 and I am very pressed for time.
>
> I simply posted the manual as a service for those that were
> interested in the continuing development of this drive. I felt uneasy
> about doing so for fear the purpose would be misconstrued.
>
> I have an addendum to the manual covering the pulse multiplier. I got
> the boards in today and got the first one going, but removing the
> manual and editing it has precedence.
>
> Mariss
>
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> bill,
> List Manager
Discussion Thread
mgrady
2000-08-22 22:59:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
wanliker@a...
2000-08-22 23:54:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Ron Ginger
2000-08-23 05:49:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Ron Ginger
2000-08-23 06:19:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Art Fenerty
2000-08-23 08:08:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-23 09:06:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
ptengin@a...
2000-08-23 16:35:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Mariss Freimanis
2000-08-23 18:00:15 UTC
Regarding the controversy
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-23 18:08:33 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-23 18:55:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
diazden
2000-08-23 20:43:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
wanliker@a...
2000-08-23 21:25:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
hans
2000-08-23 21:30:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
James Cullins
2000-08-23 21:44:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
Mariss Freimanis
2000-08-23 22:21:43 UTC
Re: Regarding the controversy
John Craddock
2000-08-23 22:45:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
ballendo@y...
2000-08-24 00:30:27 UTC
Re: Regarding the controversy