RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Goldstein [mailto:timg@...]
> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 11:21 AM
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> Subject: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
>
>
> Mariss,
>
> I would ask that you please do not remove the manual. You
> asked politely,
> the list mom said OK and of the members that have expressed
> an opinion it
> seems most are in support of this type of posting and files.
> Also remember
> that there are about 695 people on this list that are so
> little concerned
> they have said nothing about it.
>
> Point is, a few people have questioned it and most have support it, I
> personally will feel offended if this list restricts my
> ability to learn
> about things related to the hobby based upon the input of
> just a few people.
>
> Over the history of this list we have had a number of people
> that think a
> subject is too specialized and should be removed from the
> list, and others
> that think posting about selling anything is inappropriate.
> Bill has been
> very level headed on all these things and taken the long term
> perspective.
> Hot topics die off and people seeing things have not used the
> list as their
> primary promotional method and as a couple of weeks pass
> everything settles
> down to life as usual on CAD_CAM. You have become a great resource and
> should not feel forced into retracting what has been done.
>
> Tim
> [Denver, CO]
>
> P.S. I am dieing to see the addendum on the pulse multiplier!!
>