Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Posted by
mgrady
on 2000-08-22 22:59:27 UTC
If I remember correctly members of this group are beta testing"
the drives that the manual is for
Mariss is an heck of a asset to our group
you don't see blatant continuous spam from him
you see lots of helpful info
how many posts for the hidden url do you want to see
when people forget where it is
if jon or dan or anybody wants to post in the files area
if it helps some member that's what it is there for
mariss was polite and asked
and bill ok'd it if it gets out of control he will stop it
mike
ballendo@... wrote:
the drives that the manual is for
Mariss is an heck of a asset to our group
you don't see blatant continuous spam from him
you see lots of helpful info
how many posts for the hidden url do you want to see
when people forget where it is
if jon or dan or anybody wants to post in the files area
if it helps some member that's what it is there for
mariss was polite and asked
and bill ok'd it if it gets out of control he will stop it
mike
ballendo@... wrote:
> I am sad.
>
> Today my favorite list crossed what I think is/was a line that
> shouldn't be crossed. I am not the list owner, and I mean no harm but
> I want to say that it seems wrong to have gecko publish on our list
> something they don't want to publish on their own website.
>
> A suggestion: If it's not ready for public consumption, post a
> message asking for beta testers (readers). Or post a "hidden" url
> to us for where we may find it on the Geckodrives site.
>
> and appreciate his
> knowledge and willingness to share, and really believe he is on the
> right track. I hope he makes millions. :)
>
> The question begs, do we want to commercialize the list?
>
> If Jon Elson wants to post his servo drive owners manual, do we say
> yes?
>
> If Doug Yeager wants to put his CNCpro software for download, do we
> say yes?
>
> If Dan Mauch, Hans W, etc, wants to post...?
>
> Point is, there are a lot of commercial guys on this list. So far,
> there has been a good balance between letting us know whats out there,
> and keeping us true to Bills' (wanliker, the list owner) original
> vision for a hobbiest discussion forum.
>
> I hope we have not crossed the line.
>
> I am just one voice, and if I am wrong, please tell me as gently as I
> have tried to bring up what may be the beginning of a slippery slope.
>
> Ballendo
>
>
>
>
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> bill,
> List Manager
Discussion Thread
mgrady
2000-08-22 22:59:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
wanliker@a...
2000-08-22 23:54:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Ron Ginger
2000-08-23 05:49:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Ron Ginger
2000-08-23 06:19:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Art Fenerty
2000-08-23 08:08:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-23 09:06:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
ptengin@a...
2000-08-23 16:35:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Mariss Freimanis
2000-08-23 18:00:15 UTC
Regarding the controversy
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-23 18:08:33 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-23 18:55:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
diazden
2000-08-23 20:43:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
wanliker@a...
2000-08-23 21:25:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
hans
2000-08-23 21:30:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
James Cullins
2000-08-23 21:44:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
Mariss Freimanis
2000-08-23 22:21:43 UTC
Re: Regarding the controversy
John Craddock
2000-08-23 22:45:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
ballendo@y...
2000-08-24 00:30:27 UTC
Re: Regarding the controversy