Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
Posted by
wanliker@a...
on 2000-08-23 21:25:54 UTC
In a message dated 8/23/00 7:36:46 PM Mountain Daylight Time,
geckohall@... writes:
<<
I apologize for the controversy this is causing. I will remove the
manual, delete any reference to my company and repost it if I have
the time tonite. Tomorrow at 6AM my family and I are off to Kauai
till Sept 5 and I am very pressed for time.
Your putting the post in our files section was with my prior permission, and
is within the guidelines that members have expressed that they wanted.
I have not seen any abuses to the list made by you, in your posts, or in
making the file available to the list.
I am personally looking forward to seeing more information from you, as well
as others on this list.
The list is doing exactly what I wanted it to do. Making information to
people that are interested in CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO to all that desire it. the
list has been very open in the past and I really try to keep the list Mommy
stuff to a minimum.
I also feel that others have the right to post a question, but once they and
the list are advised what the policy is, then I hope that they will accept
that decision.
I have not, nor am I going to set up a do or die set of rules. Occasionally
we will have to modify the direction that we are heading in, but I hope that
is with the list members guidance.
Please understand that this list has been one of the best that I have ever
read, and that is the truth, not because I was lucky enough to start it.
I have received private mail saying the same thing about the posting, it is
acceptable, and in most cases was highly desirable.
bill
List Owner, manager, and flunky
List Mommy
geckohall@... writes:
<<
I apologize for the controversy this is causing. I will remove the
manual, delete any reference to my company and repost it if I have
the time tonite. Tomorrow at 6AM my family and I are off to Kauai
till Sept 5 and I am very pressed for time.
>>Please don't remove the file, and additionally please don't leave the list.
Your putting the post in our files section was with my prior permission, and
is within the guidelines that members have expressed that they wanted.
I have not seen any abuses to the list made by you, in your posts, or in
making the file available to the list.
I am personally looking forward to seeing more information from you, as well
as others on this list.
The list is doing exactly what I wanted it to do. Making information to
people that are interested in CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO to all that desire it. the
list has been very open in the past and I really try to keep the list Mommy
stuff to a minimum.
I also feel that others have the right to post a question, but once they and
the list are advised what the policy is, then I hope that they will accept
that decision.
I have not, nor am I going to set up a do or die set of rules. Occasionally
we will have to modify the direction that we are heading in, but I hope that
is with the list members guidance.
Please understand that this list has been one of the best that I have ever
read, and that is the truth, not because I was lucky enough to start it.
I have received private mail saying the same thing about the posting, it is
acceptable, and in most cases was highly desirable.
bill
List Owner, manager, and flunky
List Mommy
Discussion Thread
mgrady
2000-08-22 22:59:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
wanliker@a...
2000-08-22 23:54:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Ron Ginger
2000-08-23 05:49:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Ron Ginger
2000-08-23 06:19:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Art Fenerty
2000-08-23 08:08:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-23 09:06:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
ptengin@a...
2000-08-23 16:35:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Mariss Freimanis
2000-08-23 18:00:15 UTC
Regarding the controversy
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-23 18:08:33 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-23 18:55:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
diazden
2000-08-23 20:43:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
wanliker@a...
2000-08-23 21:25:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
hans
2000-08-23 21:30:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
James Cullins
2000-08-23 21:44:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
Mariss Freimanis
2000-08-23 22:21:43 UTC
Re: Regarding the controversy
John Craddock
2000-08-23 22:45:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
ballendo@y...
2000-08-24 00:30:27 UTC
Re: Regarding the controversy