CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?

Posted by beer@s...
on 2001-01-25 15:23:54 UTC
On 25 Jan, CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com wrote:
>
> Personally, I think it would be much simpler, quicker and lots cheaper to
> simply use a differnt gear ratio on one of the compound gears between the
> spindle and the gearbox.

It would be, if I could find suitable gears. Unfortunately, I can't.

The manufacturer sells a pair of gears that gets things down to 4TPI
with the stock leadscrew - with my fancy ballscrews, that means 8 TPI.

What I want is ONE TPI.

I'm making a focuser for a Newtonian telescope .. a tube inside a
tube, basically. I plan to cut the coarse thread on the outside of
the inner tube. The outer tube will have a single small diameter ball
spring loaded, pressing into the thread.

Alan


--

Alan Rothenbush | The Spartans do not ask the number of the
Academic Computing Services | enemy, only where they are.
Simon Fraser University |
Burnaby, B.C., Canada | Agix of Sparta

Discussion Thread

beer@s... 2001-01-25 10:45:21 UTC Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 11:05:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? Jon Elson 2001-01-25 11:27:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? Joe Vicars 2001-01-25 11:45:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? Joe Vicars 2001-01-25 12:00:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 12:46:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? beer@s... 2001-01-25 15:23:54 UTC Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Area51tats@a... 2001-01-25 15:45:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 16:09:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Alan Marconett KM6VV 2001-01-25 16:51:56 UTC Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Jon Anderson 2001-01-25 17:41:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? ballendo@y... 2001-01-25 18:28:20 UTC Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 19:07:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? ballendo@y... 2001-01-25 20:53:55 UTC re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? JanRwl@A... 2001-01-25 20:59:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 21:05:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 21:15:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? ballendo@y... 2001-01-25 21:44:57 UTC Re: re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 23:41:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? fastvid@e... 2001-01-26 09:15:24 UTC Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Dick Ganderton 2001-01-26 13:58:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?