Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
Posted by
beer@s...
on 2001-01-25 15:23:54 UTC
On 25 Jan, CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com wrote:
The manufacturer sells a pair of gears that gets things down to 4TPI
with the stock leadscrew - with my fancy ballscrews, that means 8 TPI.
What I want is ONE TPI.
I'm making a focuser for a Newtonian telescope .. a tube inside a
tube, basically. I plan to cut the coarse thread on the outside of
the inner tube. The outer tube will have a single small diameter ball
spring loaded, pressing into the thread.
Alan
--
Alan Rothenbush | The Spartans do not ask the number of the
Academic Computing Services | enemy, only where they are.
Simon Fraser University |
Burnaby, B.C., Canada | Agix of Sparta
>It would be, if I could find suitable gears. Unfortunately, I can't.
> Personally, I think it would be much simpler, quicker and lots cheaper to
> simply use a differnt gear ratio on one of the compound gears between the
> spindle and the gearbox.
The manufacturer sells a pair of gears that gets things down to 4TPI
with the stock leadscrew - with my fancy ballscrews, that means 8 TPI.
What I want is ONE TPI.
I'm making a focuser for a Newtonian telescope .. a tube inside a
tube, basically. I plan to cut the coarse thread on the outside of
the inner tube. The outer tube will have a single small diameter ball
spring loaded, pressing into the thread.
Alan
--
Alan Rothenbush | The Spartans do not ask the number of the
Academic Computing Services | enemy, only where they are.
Simon Fraser University |
Burnaby, B.C., Canada | Agix of Sparta
Discussion Thread
beer@s...
2001-01-25 10:45:21 UTC
Is this too nuts to consider ?
Smoke
2001-01-25 11:05:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ?
Jon Elson
2001-01-25 11:27:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ?
Joe Vicars
2001-01-25 11:45:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ?
Joe Vicars
2001-01-25 12:00:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ?
Smoke
2001-01-25 12:46:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ?
beer@s...
2001-01-25 15:23:54 UTC
Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
Area51tats@a...
2001-01-25 15:45:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ?
Smoke
2001-01-25 16:09:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-25 16:51:56 UTC
Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
Jon Anderson
2001-01-25 17:41:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
ballendo@y...
2001-01-25 18:28:20 UTC
Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
Smoke
2001-01-25 19:07:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
ballendo@y...
2001-01-25 20:53:55 UTC
re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
JanRwl@A...
2001-01-25 20:59:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ?
Smoke
2001-01-25 21:05:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
Smoke
2001-01-25 21:15:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
ballendo@y...
2001-01-25 21:44:57 UTC
Re: re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
Smoke
2001-01-25 23:41:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
fastvid@e...
2001-01-26 09:15:24 UTC
Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
Dick Ganderton
2001-01-26 13:58:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?