Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ?
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2001-01-25 11:27:50 UTC
beer@... wrote:
on the bracket that allows for special gear ratios. But, the fast rotation
of the leadscrew seemed like it would overload the gear train. So, I
powered the lathe from the leadscrew! This was actually a spiral
on a plate, using the power cross feed. So, I powered the lathe manually
from the cross feed handle, which moved the tool directly, and also
fed power to the spindle through the gear reduction of the leadscrew
and threading gears. It worked fine, too!
You could do the same, powering the leadscrew and allowing the gears
to drive the spindle. Take small cuts, of course, to reduce the load
on the gearing.
Jon
> I want/need to cut a MUCH coarser thread than my lathe is capable of.I once needed to cut an extremely coarse thread. I arranged the gears
> Ruminating upon possible solutions to the problem
>
> ( when I as younger, I used to THINK about problems, but now ... )
>
> it occurs to me that if I attached a stepper or servo to the lathe
> SPINDLE ( somehow ) and suitably configured the "steps per inch"
> parameter based upon the diameter of the material, I could cut threads
> via CNC !
on the bracket that allows for special gear ratios. But, the fast rotation
of the leadscrew seemed like it would overload the gear train. So, I
powered the lathe from the leadscrew! This was actually a spiral
on a plate, using the power cross feed. So, I powered the lathe manually
from the cross feed handle, which moved the tool directly, and also
fed power to the spindle through the gear reduction of the leadscrew
and threading gears. It worked fine, too!
You could do the same, powering the leadscrew and allowing the gears
to drive the spindle. Take small cuts, of course, to reduce the load
on the gearing.
Jon
Discussion Thread
beer@s...
2001-01-25 10:45:21 UTC
Is this too nuts to consider ?
Smoke
2001-01-25 11:05:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ?
Jon Elson
2001-01-25 11:27:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ?
Joe Vicars
2001-01-25 11:45:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ?
Joe Vicars
2001-01-25 12:00:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ?
Smoke
2001-01-25 12:46:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ?
beer@s...
2001-01-25 15:23:54 UTC
Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
Area51tats@a...
2001-01-25 15:45:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ?
Smoke
2001-01-25 16:09:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-25 16:51:56 UTC
Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
Jon Anderson
2001-01-25 17:41:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
ballendo@y...
2001-01-25 18:28:20 UTC
Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
Smoke
2001-01-25 19:07:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
ballendo@y...
2001-01-25 20:53:55 UTC
re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
JanRwl@A...
2001-01-25 20:59:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ?
Smoke
2001-01-25 21:05:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
Smoke
2001-01-25 21:15:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
ballendo@y...
2001-01-25 21:44:57 UTC
Re: re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
Smoke
2001-01-25 23:41:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
fastvid@e...
2001-01-26 09:15:24 UTC
Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?
Dick Ganderton
2001-01-26 13:58:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?