CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ?

Posted by Smoke
on 2001-01-25 12:46:12 UTC
Yep! Looks like if you want to using gearing only to set up your lathe for
rifling, you'll have to make other (easy but not cheap) modifications.
Replace the motor with a variable speed DC system (and possibly different
drive pulleys) that will let you run the spindle at VERY slow RPM. Do I
recommend it?...NO. Will it work?...sure. Is it worth it? probably not.

There are a couple of alternatives here which we haven't...and won't (here)
that easily overcome those gearing problems.

Smoke


>Yes you could but it's not practical because the speed of the gear train
relative to the spindle would be too fast for any normal
>gearset.
>Example: rifle barrel twist of 1/4 turn per foot, and you have a 10 tpi
leadscrew on your lathe. The leadscrew must rotate 40
>times faster than the spindle rpm. So at 100 RPM on the spindle your
leadscrew is MOVIN at 4 grand!
>This also means that your pushin 40 times the torque through the geartrain
too.
>
>Smoke wrote:

Discussion Thread

beer@s... 2001-01-25 10:45:21 UTC Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 11:05:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? Jon Elson 2001-01-25 11:27:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? Joe Vicars 2001-01-25 11:45:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? Joe Vicars 2001-01-25 12:00:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 12:46:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? beer@s... 2001-01-25 15:23:54 UTC Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Area51tats@a... 2001-01-25 15:45:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 16:09:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Alan Marconett KM6VV 2001-01-25 16:51:56 UTC Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Jon Anderson 2001-01-25 17:41:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? ballendo@y... 2001-01-25 18:28:20 UTC Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 19:07:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? ballendo@y... 2001-01-25 20:53:55 UTC re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? JanRwl@A... 2001-01-25 20:59:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 21:05:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 21:15:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? ballendo@y... 2001-01-25 21:44:57 UTC Re: re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 23:41:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? fastvid@e... 2001-01-26 09:15:24 UTC Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Dick Ganderton 2001-01-26 13:58:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?