CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ?

Posted by Joe Vicars
on 2001-01-25 11:45:21 UTC
Yes you could but it's not practical because the speed of the gear train relative to the spindle would be too fast for any normal
gearset.
Example: rifle barrel twist of 1/4 turn per foot, and you have a 10 tpi leadscrew on your lathe. The leadscrew must rotate 40
times faster than the spindle rpm. So at 100 RPM on the spindle your leadscrew is MOVIN at 4 grand!
This also means that your pushin 40 times the torque through the geartrain too.

Smoke wrote:

> Personally, I think it would be much simpler, quicker and lots cheaper to
> simply use a differnt gear ratio on one of the compound gears between the
> spindle and the gearbox.
>
> In fact if you change the gearing enough you COULD set up the lathe for
> machining real slow twists required for barrel rifling.
>
> Smoke
>
> >I want/need to cut a MUCH coarser thread than my lathe is capable of.
> >Ruminating upon possible solutions to the problem
> >
> > ( when I as younger, I used to THINK about problems, but now ... )
> >
> >it occurs to me that if I attached a stepper or servo to the lathe
> >SPINDLE ( somehow ) and suitably configured the "steps per inch"
> >parameter based upon the diameter of the material, I could cut threads
> >via CNC !
> >
> >Certainly, math errors could be a problem and it's unlikely to be
> >fast, but it SEEMS like it might work .. any comments ?
> >
> >Alan
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html

Discussion Thread

beer@s... 2001-01-25 10:45:21 UTC Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 11:05:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? Jon Elson 2001-01-25 11:27:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? Joe Vicars 2001-01-25 11:45:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? Joe Vicars 2001-01-25 12:00:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 12:46:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? beer@s... 2001-01-25 15:23:54 UTC Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Area51tats@a... 2001-01-25 15:45:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 16:09:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Alan Marconett KM6VV 2001-01-25 16:51:56 UTC Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Jon Anderson 2001-01-25 17:41:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? ballendo@y... 2001-01-25 18:28:20 UTC Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 19:07:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? ballendo@y... 2001-01-25 20:53:55 UTC re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? JanRwl@A... 2001-01-25 20:59:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 21:05:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 21:15:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? ballendo@y... 2001-01-25 21:44:57 UTC Re: re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Smoke 2001-01-25 23:41:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:Re: Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? fastvid@e... 2001-01-26 09:15:24 UTC Re: Is this too nuts to consider ? Dick Ganderton 2001-01-26 13:58:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Is this too nuts to consider ?