Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Posted by
Bryan-TheBS-Smith
on 2001-08-19 12:12:03 UTC
Larry Edington wrote:
66MHz PCI slot is just as fast as 32-bit AGPx2 -- although AGP has
some "niche" features that PCI doesn't.
Basically, AGP was an attempt by Intel to give video its own
dedicated bus and memory access using its lower-costing SMP design,
instead of having to build a _real_ point-to-point bus interconnect
like those used by Alpha, MIPS and SPARC. Hence why x86 doesn't
scale well beyond 4 processors.
AMD's Athlon uses the Alpha EV7 (Alpha 264) interconnect, which
allows upto 16 nodes on an interconnect. This is how a dual-Athlon
system can give I/O higher response times and throughput than
dual-Intel systems, even though it still only uses a single memory
bus -- because one CPU can be doing I/O while another is handling
memory transfers.
I could technobable more but I won't. Heck, I have probably already
babbled enough (and gone quite off-topic).
-- TheBS
--
Bryan "TheBS" Smith mailto:b.j.smith@... chat:thebs413
Engineer Absolute Value Systems, Inc. http://www.linux-wlan.org
President SmithConcepts, Inc. http://www.SmithConcepts.com
> AGP is basically a PCI bus clocked 4x faster.Er, sort of. It is 4x a "normal" 32-bit, 33MHz PCI. A 64-bit,
66MHz PCI slot is just as fast as 32-bit AGPx2 -- although AGP has
some "niche" features that PCI doesn't.
Basically, AGP was an attempt by Intel to give video its own
dedicated bus and memory access using its lower-costing SMP design,
instead of having to build a _real_ point-to-point bus interconnect
like those used by Alpha, MIPS and SPARC. Hence why x86 doesn't
scale well beyond 4 processors.
AMD's Athlon uses the Alpha EV7 (Alpha 264) interconnect, which
allows upto 16 nodes on an interconnect. This is how a dual-Athlon
system can give I/O higher response times and throughput than
dual-Intel systems, even though it still only uses a single memory
bus -- because one CPU can be doing I/O while another is handling
memory transfers.
I could technobable more but I won't. Heck, I have probably already
babbled enough (and gone quite off-topic).
-- TheBS
--
Bryan "TheBS" Smith mailto:b.j.smith@... chat:thebs413
Engineer Absolute Value Systems, Inc. http://www.linux-wlan.org
President SmithConcepts, Inc. http://www.SmithConcepts.com
Discussion Thread
Bryan-TheBS-Smith
2001-08-18 20:33:52 UTC
Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Weyland
2001-08-18 21:20:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Bryan-TheBS-Smith
2001-08-18 21:47:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Jon Elson
2001-08-18 23:00:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Jon Elson
2001-08-18 23:17:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Ian Wright
2001-08-19 02:16:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Wally Daniels
2001-08-19 03:57:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Bryan-TheBS-Smith
2001-08-19 05:26:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Bryan-TheBS-Smith
2001-08-19 05:30:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Bryan-TheBS-Smith
2001-08-19 05:53:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Bryan-TheBS-Smith
2001-08-19 06:07:39 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Larry Edington
2001-08-19 06:12:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Larry Edington
2001-08-19 06:14:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Bryan-TheBS-Smith
2001-08-19 06:29:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Bryan-TheBS-Smith
2001-08-19 06:30:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
William Scalione
2001-08-19 09:13:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Larry Edington
2001-08-19 09:28:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Carlos Guillermo
2001-08-19 09:46:57 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Larry Edington
2001-08-19 10:08:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Bryan-TheBS-Smith
2001-08-19 10:31:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2001-08-19 10:42:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2001-08-19 10:45:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Weyland
2001-08-19 10:56:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Larry Edington
2001-08-19 11:56:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Bryan-TheBS-Smith
2001-08-19 12:07:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Larry Edington
2001-08-19 12:10:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Bryan-TheBS-Smith
2001-08-19 12:12:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Larry Edington
2001-08-19 12:21:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Jon Elson
2001-08-19 14:41:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Bryan-TheBS-Smith
2001-08-19 16:53:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...
Bryan-TheBS-Smith
2001-08-19 16:56:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Interface options, headless boxen, and remote control ...