Re: G320s, New and Improved!
Posted by
mariss92705@y...
on 2001-09-06 18:03:23 UTC
Jon,
Good afternoon! The only way illegal transitions can occur are if (1)
the channel A and B lines are shorted together or (2) a non-
quadrature encoder is used such as using the least 2 bits of an
absolute encoder. In either case the error will be caught due to the
ensuing consequences.
You are a very talented and skilled person with an educational
backgroud necessary to design and build a "no holds barred" servo
drive; I too have done that as well. It is on this point I would like
to expand the reply to a more general philosophical perspective.
My first point is experience has shown the last 10% of performance
consumes 90% of the final cost. My second point is a cost-beneft
ratio exists for almost anything one undertakes.
The second point implies the existance of a "sweet point" or value
where performance divided by cost is at a maximum. It takes effort to
find this optimal mix and it is the cause of satisfaction if one
comes close.
Compared to the G320, clearly your servodrive has more features, not
the least of which is tacho feedback. However it would cost between
$500 to $1,000 to the end user when all is said and done. Witness the
price of any mainline industrial servodrive.
There are Volkswagens and there are Ferraris and both are cars. Both
will get you from here to there and both beat walking. My design
efforts have focused on the utilitarian end. Your design is a high
end one and obviously works. With that said I would warmly encourage
you to produce it for sale, there is room for both. It would place me
on a more even footing as well since then I would be able to offer
helpful suggestions on how to improve it:)
Mariss
Good afternoon! The only way illegal transitions can occur are if (1)
the channel A and B lines are shorted together or (2) a non-
quadrature encoder is used such as using the least 2 bits of an
absolute encoder. In either case the error will be caught due to the
ensuing consequences.
You are a very talented and skilled person with an educational
backgroud necessary to design and build a "no holds barred" servo
drive; I too have done that as well. It is on this point I would like
to expand the reply to a more general philosophical perspective.
My first point is experience has shown the last 10% of performance
consumes 90% of the final cost. My second point is a cost-beneft
ratio exists for almost anything one undertakes.
The second point implies the existance of a "sweet point" or value
where performance divided by cost is at a maximum. It takes effort to
find this optimal mix and it is the cause of satisfaction if one
comes close.
Compared to the G320, clearly your servodrive has more features, not
the least of which is tacho feedback. However it would cost between
$500 to $1,000 to the end user when all is said and done. Witness the
price of any mainline industrial servodrive.
There are Volkswagens and there are Ferraris and both are cars. Both
will get you from here to there and both beat walking. My design
efforts have focused on the utilitarian end. Your design is a high
end one and obviously works. With that said I would warmly encourage
you to produce it for sale, there is room for both. It would place me
on a more even footing as well since then I would be able to offer
helpful suggestions on how to improve it:)
Mariss
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
.
>
> Ah ha! Yes, it seemed like you might have had this problem in some
> installations. I not only have plain filtering, I also refuse to
accept
> any illegal transitions, ie. from 11 to 00 (from 11 to either 01 or
10 is
> legal) and just wait until a legal one shows up.
>
> Jon
Discussion Thread
mariss92705@y...
2001-09-05 22:26:01 UTC
G320s, New and Improved!
Jon Elson
2001-09-06 10:35:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G320s, New and Improved!
machines@n...
2001-09-06 13:58:17 UTC
Re: G320s, New and Improved!
Jon Elson
2001-09-06 17:44:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G320s, New and Improved!
mariss92705@y...
2001-09-06 18:03:23 UTC
Re: G320s, New and Improved!
Jon Elson
2001-09-06 22:28:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G320s, New and Improved!
Drew Rogge
2001-09-07 10:52:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G320s, New and Improved!
beer@s...
2001-09-07 11:04:42 UTC
Re: Re: G320s, New and Improved!
Tim
2001-09-07 11:17:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G320s, New and Improved!
mariss92705@y...
2001-09-07 19:06:31 UTC
Re: G320s, New and Improved!
M. SHABBIR
2001-09-08 10:04:36 UTC
servo motors
Tim Goldstein
2001-09-09 16:26:27 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G320s, New and Improved!
carlcnc@e...
2001-09-09 16:53:48 UTC
Re: G320s, New and Improved!
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-09-09 18:25:13 UTC
Re: G320s, New and Improved!
shymu@b...
2001-09-09 19:34:50 UTC
Re: G320s, New and Improved!
Tim Goldstein
2001-09-09 19:41:56 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G320s, New and Improved!
Jon Elson
2001-09-09 21:43:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G320s, New and Improved!
Tim Goldstein
2001-09-09 21:58:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G320s, New and Improved!
mariss92705@y...
2001-09-10 00:08:28 UTC
Re: G320s, New and Improved!
mariss92705@y...
2001-09-10 00:24:19 UTC
Re: G320s, New and Improved!
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-09-10 00:24:35 UTC
Re: G320s, New and Improved!
mariss92705@y...
2001-09-10 00:46:26 UTC
Re: G320s, New and Improved!
Jon Elson
2001-09-10 11:15:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G320s, New and Improved!
machines@n...
2001-09-10 12:18:24 UTC
Open Letter to Mariss
Brian Walsh
2001-09-10 13:45:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Open Letter to Mariss
rab@r...
2001-09-10 14:31:59 UTC
Re: Open Letter to Mariss
mariss92705@y...
2001-09-10 17:16:09 UTC
Re: Open Letter to Mariss
Robert Allen & Marsha Camp
2001-09-10 19:13:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G320s, New and Improved!
Tim Goldstein
2001-09-10 21:17:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G320s, New and Improved!
machines@n...
2001-09-11 05:10:23 UTC
Re: Open Letter to Mariss
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-09-11 06:45:50 UTC
WTC tragedy
Jon Elson
2001-09-11 08:09:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] WTC tragedy
Pavel Korensky
2001-09-11 09:44:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] WTC tragedy
Bryan-TheBS-Smith
2001-09-11 12:08:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] WTC tragedy
Ian Wright
2001-09-11 13:08:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] WTC tragedy
info.host@b...
2001-09-11 14:41:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] WTC tragedy
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-09-11 15:26:25 UTC
Re: WTC tragedy
Paul
2001-09-11 15:45:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] WTC tragedy
mariss92705@y...
2001-09-11 15:51:24 UTC
Re: WTC tragedy
wanliker@a...
2001-09-11 16:06:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] WTC tragedy
shymu@b...
2001-09-11 16:27:23 UTC
Re: WTC tragedy
info.host@b...
2001-09-11 16:57:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] WTC tragedy
info.host@b...
2001-09-11 16:59:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] WTC tragedy
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2001-09-11 17:16:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] WTC tragedy
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-09-11 19:54:33 UTC
Re: WTC tragedy
cnc002@a...
2001-09-12 08:53:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] WTC tragedy
cnc002@a...
2001-09-12 08:56:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: WTC tragedy
JanRwl@A...
2001-09-12 10:52:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: WTC tragedy
zeff1015@a...
2001-09-12 11:10:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] WTC tragedy
Art Fenerty
2001-09-12 11:39:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: WTC tragedy
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-09-12 16:21:05 UTC
WTC tragedy
mariss92705@y...
2001-09-12 18:24:55 UTC
Re: WTC tragedy
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-09-12 21:52:10 UTC
Re: WTC tragedy
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-09-12 22:08:30 UTC
Re: WTC tragedy
marble here
2001-09-12 22:09:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: WTC tragedy
marble here
2001-09-12 23:04:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: WTC tragedy
peter smith
2001-09-13 20:25:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: WTC tragedy
JanRwl@A...
2001-09-13 23:07:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: WTC tragedy
M. SHABBIR
2001-09-14 00:42:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] WTC tragedy