Re: emc (TOME)
Posted by
garfield@x...
on 1999-10-12 17:59:57 UTC
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999 16:22:58 -0700, Jon Anderson
<janders@...> wrote:
software [cuz you can TOUCH it] to both emit and consume just the
G-codes you've come to know and love, if need be.
(especially in RT kernels), and EMC-style CAM software freedom still
lives in another 5-10 years, you'll see a multitude of things like this.
Because there are ALWAYS more creative minds wanting to develop and
extend the envelop, that can *ever* be sequestered within the confines
of commercial software offices. Think of all the people that learned how
to write OpSys internals via FreeBSD (geez am I dating meself :) and the
like, that NEVER would have had a chance to do same at Microsoft or IBM,
but were not only PERFECTLY capable, but some simply brilliant at it.
Only a very few of them thot of such learning as a means to big $$$. [I
expect those now work at MS :] Most of them just wanted to enjoy and
learn and expand their horizons as thinkers, doers, and builders.
Collaboration driven by raw mutual interest is a VERY powerful engine
for progress. It used to be called "science" way back when, before that
too went 'commercial'. I'm idealizing a tad, but you get me drift I
expect.
Put forward a proposal for what you've sketched above, Jon. You might be
surprised a project could spring up out of just such a germinating seed.
Wouldn't exactly be a first, ya know. :)
Gar
<janders@...> wrote:
>... I'm at the commercial endYup, and the wunnerful thing is, IF you want to, you can customize the
>of the spectrum here, time IS money, and I want the most power and speed
>I can get for my limited bucks. EMC and scrounged servos offer that, and
>I'll dink with the software late at night until it's working. When I get
>to making chips, I want to be able to use the G-codes I know and the
>hundred or so programs I've already got.
software [cuz you can TOUCH it] to both emit and consume just the
G-codes you've come to know and love, if need be.
>Something I would love to see, would be a PC or Linux based program thatAgain, I would think it a cinch that if Linux-style OpSys freedoms
>duplicated the fill-in-the-blanks approach of Proto-Trak and such, and
>generate standard G-code.
>This seems like a perfect brewing ground for input/ideas and beta
>testers, and I rather suspect there would be a significant commercial
>potential.
(especially in RT kernels), and EMC-style CAM software freedom still
lives in another 5-10 years, you'll see a multitude of things like this.
Because there are ALWAYS more creative minds wanting to develop and
extend the envelop, that can *ever* be sequestered within the confines
of commercial software offices. Think of all the people that learned how
to write OpSys internals via FreeBSD (geez am I dating meself :) and the
like, that NEVER would have had a chance to do same at Microsoft or IBM,
but were not only PERFECTLY capable, but some simply brilliant at it.
Only a very few of them thot of such learning as a means to big $$$. [I
expect those now work at MS :] Most of them just wanted to enjoy and
learn and expand their horizons as thinkers, doers, and builders.
Collaboration driven by raw mutual interest is a VERY powerful engine
for progress. It used to be called "science" way back when, before that
too went 'commercial'. I'm idealizing a tad, but you get me drift I
expect.
Put forward a proposal for what you've sketched above, Jon. You might be
surprised a project could spring up out of just such a germinating seed.
Wouldn't exactly be a first, ya know. :)
Gar
Discussion Thread
garfield@x...
1999-10-12 15:51:03 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
stratton@x...
1999-10-12 16:21:56 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
Jon Anderson
1999-10-12 16:22:58 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
batwings@x...
1999-10-12 07:34:53 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
batwings@x...
1999-10-12 08:26:55 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
garfield@x...
1999-10-12 17:59:55 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
garfield@x...
1999-10-12 17:59:57 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
mike grady
1999-10-12 18:11:07 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
garfield@x...
1999-10-12 18:40:27 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
batwings@x...
1999-10-12 11:03:57 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
garfield@x...
1999-10-12 22:10:52 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
PTENGIN@x...
1999-10-13 01:20:45 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
Carlos Guillermo
1999-10-13 04:57:18 UTC
RE: emc (TOME)
Marshall Pharoah
1999-10-13 04:59:01 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
batwings@x...
1999-10-12 20:55:12 UTC
RE: emc (TOME)
Ray Henry
1999-10-13 07:18:17 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
Fred Proctor
1999-10-13 07:33:52 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
Jon Anderson
1999-10-13 07:59:47 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
Jon Anderson
1999-10-13 08:42:05 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
batwings@x...
1999-10-13 02:06:23 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
Jon Anderson
1999-10-13 12:35:07 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
PTENGIN@x...
1999-10-13 14:48:56 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
batwings@x...
1999-10-13 06:17:42 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
garfield@x...
1999-10-13 17:04:22 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
Darrell Gehlsen
1999-10-13 17:18:00 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)
Jon Anderson
1999-10-13 17:35:47 UTC
Re: emc (TOME)