CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Geck G201

Posted by studleylee
on 2002-02-12 15:22:48 UTC
John,
I agree! I'm very happy with mine and I'm driving Nema42 1200oz/in
steppers with them. They are pretty much wire-and-play.
-Lee

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Art Fenerty" <fenerty@h...> wrote:
> John:
>
> You'll have to look around to find better than a gecko. Its
considered the
> drive of choice for alot of us.
> Art
> Master5 Software
> http://users.andara.com/~fenerty/master.htm
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "zemenz2003" <PAULTOMKIN@R...>
> To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:51 PM
> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Geck G201
>
>
> > Could anyone tell me how good Gecko G201 is before i buy a bunch?
> > I need a stepper drive that can take a beating. I will be using
200
> > oz in Vexta 6 wire steppers. I understand from the Engineer that
> > these are good motors to go with it.I would be very greatfull to
> > hear from all of the happy users out there. Will this work good
with
> > Maxnc step and direction 4 channel software?
> >
> >
> > Thank you John Mars
> >
> >
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> >
> > Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@y...
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@y...
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@y..., wanliker@a...
> > Moderator: jmelson@a... timg@k... [Moderator]
> > URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> > bill,
> > List Manager
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >

Discussion Thread

zemenz2003 2002-02-12 15:02:42 UTC Geck G201 Art Fenerty 2002-02-12 15:14:40 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Geck G201 studleylee 2002-02-12 15:22:48 UTC Re: Geck G201 Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-02-12 15:57:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Geck G201 Bob Campbell 2002-02-12 16:34:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Geck G201 methadras 2002-02-12 17:37:01 UTC Re: Geck G201 methadras 2002-02-12 17:37:56 UTC Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-12 17:53:29 UTC Re: Geck G201 studleylee 2002-02-13 09:16:05 UTC Re: Geck G201 cadcamcenter 2002-02-13 17:46:15 UTC Re: Geck G201 cadcamcenter 2002-02-13 17:46:15 UTC Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-13 19:18:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-13 20:47:36 UTC Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-13 21:30:09 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-13 22:16:37 UTC Re: Geck G201 Scot Rogers 2002-02-13 23:54:03 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 Drew Rogge 2002-02-14 08:07:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 mariss92705 2002-02-14 09:12:02 UTC Re: Geck G201 Spam Box 2002-02-14 09:28:32 UTC [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 mariss92705 2002-02-14 10:45:09 UTC Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-14 18:21:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-14 18:59:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-14 19:10:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-14 19:47:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-14 21:12:05 UTC Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-14 21:26:08 UTC Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-14 21:33:51 UTC Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-14 21:41:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 luisguillermo98 2002-02-20 16:29:09 UTC Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-20 17:31:25 UTC Re: Geck G201 luisguillermo98 2002-02-20 20:52:15 UTC Re: Geck G201 ballendo 2002-02-20 23:51:56 UTC Re: Gecko G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-20 23:52:58 UTC Re: Geck G201 luisguillermo98 2002-02-21 14:52:48 UTC Re: Gecko G201