CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Geck G201

Posted by fast1994gto
on 2002-02-20 23:52:58 UTC
I have no idea what you are capable of getting out of your setup, I
can only speak to mine. Tuning is a big part of it.


Barry

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "luisguillermo98" <luisguillermo98@y...>
wrote:
> so you are telling me I can not get about 30ipm with those drivers?
>
> that's not good. I thought I could get more out of those drivers..
>
>
>
> -- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "fast1994gto" <beking@h...> wrote:
> > Use decent motors, a fast enough computer, and a fast enough
> control
> > mechanism. I run EMC on a P-III 600. I have various steppes
from
> > Eastern Air Devices, Vexta and Superior Electric. In general,
use
> > lots of voltage as described elsewehere. It depends upon the
> > combinations of things in the mix, and determining how they
> interact
> > is in the messages archives here, the same place I got it.
> >
> > There are many combinations of motors, power supplies, computers
> and
> > controllers that will work very well just so long as they all
work
> > together.
> >
> > Note that the math below was wrong but I corrected it in a
> subsequent
> > post.
> >
> >
> > Barry
> >
> > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "luisguillermo98"
> <luisguillermo98@y...>
> > wrote:
> > > SO how can I get 20ipm to 30ipm with a gecko.. my system is
very
> > slow
> > > right now.. I am not using gecko but I'll get it soon..
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "fast1994gto" <beking@h...> wrote:
> > > > You need this sometimes when the indexer has a hard time
> > generatig
> > > > the number of pulses required to actually get some speed out
of
> > the
> > > > motors.
> > > >
> > > > Here's an example:
> > > >
> > > > Taig 2019 mill with 20 pitch leadscrew. Thats 0.05" per
> > revolution
> > > > of the screw or 20 turns per inch. At 10 microsteps per step
> and
> > > 200
> > > > steps per turn and 20 turns per inch that works out to a
> whopping
> > > > 40,000 pulses to go a measily inch. Let's consider an
indexer
> > that
> > > > can (only) crank out 8kHz or 8,000 pulses per second.
> > > >
> > > > 40,000 pulses/inch / 8,000 pulses/sec = 5 sec/inch
> > > >
> > > > Expressed more naturally that is 0.2 inches/sec (IPS). That
> > works
> > > > out to a paltry 2.4 IPM. That really sucks. You want 20-30
> > IPM.
> > > > That would require up to 500,000 or 500 kHz worth of pulses.
> > > >
> > > > Some indexers (or slower computers) will struggle with
> producing
> > > that
> > > > many pusles. Hence the rate (pulse) multiplier. It buys you
> the
> > > > headroom on your indexer to produce fewer pulses whilst
> allowing
> > > you
> > > > to retain the advantages of the smooth microstepping Gecko
> drive.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Barry
> > > >
> > > > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., JanRwl@A... wrote:
> > > > > In a message dated 14-Feb-02 11:29:09 Central Standard
Time,
> > > > > spambox@r... writes:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Okay, stupid newbie question: what's the multiplier do
and
> > why
> > > do
> > > > I want it?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > NOT a "stupid newbie question"! I am an OLD member, and I
am
> > > STILL
> > > > waiting
> > > > > for this same explanation myself!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Discussion Thread

zemenz2003 2002-02-12 15:02:42 UTC Geck G201 Art Fenerty 2002-02-12 15:14:40 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Geck G201 studleylee 2002-02-12 15:22:48 UTC Re: Geck G201 Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-02-12 15:57:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Geck G201 Bob Campbell 2002-02-12 16:34:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Geck G201 methadras 2002-02-12 17:37:01 UTC Re: Geck G201 methadras 2002-02-12 17:37:56 UTC Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-12 17:53:29 UTC Re: Geck G201 studleylee 2002-02-13 09:16:05 UTC Re: Geck G201 cadcamcenter 2002-02-13 17:46:15 UTC Re: Geck G201 cadcamcenter 2002-02-13 17:46:15 UTC Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-13 19:18:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-13 20:47:36 UTC Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-13 21:30:09 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-13 22:16:37 UTC Re: Geck G201 Scot Rogers 2002-02-13 23:54:03 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 Drew Rogge 2002-02-14 08:07:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 mariss92705 2002-02-14 09:12:02 UTC Re: Geck G201 Spam Box 2002-02-14 09:28:32 UTC [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 mariss92705 2002-02-14 10:45:09 UTC Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-14 18:21:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-14 18:59:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-14 19:10:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-14 19:47:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-14 21:12:05 UTC Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-14 21:26:08 UTC Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-14 21:33:51 UTC Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-14 21:41:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 luisguillermo98 2002-02-20 16:29:09 UTC Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-20 17:31:25 UTC Re: Geck G201 luisguillermo98 2002-02-20 20:52:15 UTC Re: Geck G201 ballendo 2002-02-20 23:51:56 UTC Re: Gecko G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-20 23:52:58 UTC Re: Geck G201 luisguillermo98 2002-02-21 14:52:48 UTC Re: Gecko G201