Re: Geck G201
Posted by
fast1994gto
on 2002-02-20 23:52:58 UTC
I have no idea what you are capable of getting out of your setup, I
can only speak to mine. Tuning is a big part of it.
Barry
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "luisguillermo98" <luisguillermo98@y...>
wrote:
can only speak to mine. Tuning is a big part of it.
Barry
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "luisguillermo98" <luisguillermo98@y...>
wrote:
> so you are telling me I can not get about 30ipm with those drivers?from
>
> that's not good. I thought I could get more out of those drivers..
>
>
>
> -- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "fast1994gto" <beking@h...> wrote:
> > Use decent motors, a fast enough computer, and a fast enough
> control
> > mechanism. I run EMC on a P-III 600. I have various steppes
> > Eastern Air Devices, Vexta and Superior Electric. In general,use
> > lots of voltage as described elsewehere. It depends upon thework
> > combinations of things in the mix, and determining how they
> interact
> > is in the messages archives here, the same place I got it.
> >
> > There are many combinations of motors, power supplies, computers
> and
> > controllers that will work very well just so long as they all
> > together.very
> >
> > Note that the math below was wrong but I corrected it in a
> subsequent
> > post.
> >
> >
> > Barry
> >
> > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "luisguillermo98"
> <luisguillermo98@y...>
> > wrote:
> > > SO how can I get 20ipm to 30ipm with a gecko.. my system is
> > slowof
> > > right now.. I am not using gecko but I'll get it soon..
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "fast1994gto" <beking@h...> wrote:
> > > > You need this sometimes when the indexer has a hard time
> > generatig
> > > > the number of pulses required to actually get some speed out
> > theindexer
> > > > motors.
> > > >
> > > > Here's an example:
> > > >
> > > > Taig 2019 mill with 20 pitch leadscrew. Thats 0.05" per
> > revolution
> > > > of the screw or 20 turns per inch. At 10 microsteps per step
> and
> > > 200
> > > > steps per turn and 20 turns per inch that works out to a
> whopping
> > > > 40,000 pulses to go a measily inch. Let's consider an
> > thatTime,
> > > > can (only) crank out 8kHz or 8,000 pulses per second.
> > > >
> > > > 40,000 pulses/inch / 8,000 pulses/sec = 5 sec/inch
> > > >
> > > > Expressed more naturally that is 0.2 inches/sec (IPS). That
> > works
> > > > out to a paltry 2.4 IPM. That really sucks. You want 20-30
> > IPM.
> > > > That would require up to 500,000 or 500 kHz worth of pulses.
> > > >
> > > > Some indexers (or slower computers) will struggle with
> producing
> > > that
> > > > many pusles. Hence the rate (pulse) multiplier. It buys you
> the
> > > > headroom on your indexer to produce fewer pulses whilst
> allowing
> > > you
> > > > to retain the advantages of the smooth microstepping Gecko
> drive.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Barry
> > > >
> > > > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., JanRwl@A... wrote:
> > > > > In a message dated 14-Feb-02 11:29:09 Central Standard
> > > > > spambox@r... writes:and
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Okay, stupid newbie question: what's the multiplier do
> > whyam
> > > do
> > > > I want it?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > NOT a "stupid newbie question"! I am an OLD member, and I
> > > STILL
> > > > waiting
> > > > > for this same explanation myself!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
zemenz2003
2002-02-12 15:02:42 UTC
Geck G201
Art Fenerty
2002-02-12 15:14:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Geck G201
studleylee
2002-02-12 15:22:48 UTC
Re: Geck G201
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-02-12 15:57:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Geck G201
Bob Campbell
2002-02-12 16:34:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Geck G201
methadras
2002-02-12 17:37:01 UTC
Re: Geck G201
methadras
2002-02-12 17:37:56 UTC
Re: Geck G201
fast1994gto
2002-02-12 17:53:29 UTC
Re: Geck G201
studleylee
2002-02-13 09:16:05 UTC
Re: Geck G201
cadcamcenter
2002-02-13 17:46:15 UTC
Re: Geck G201
cadcamcenter
2002-02-13 17:46:15 UTC
Re: Geck G201
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-13 19:18:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
fast1994gto
2002-02-13 20:47:36 UTC
Re: Geck G201
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-13 21:30:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
fast1994gto
2002-02-13 22:16:37 UTC
Re: Geck G201
Scot Rogers
2002-02-13 23:54:03 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
Drew Rogge
2002-02-14 08:07:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
mariss92705
2002-02-14 09:12:02 UTC
Re: Geck G201
Spam Box
2002-02-14 09:28:32 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
mariss92705
2002-02-14 10:45:09 UTC
Re: Geck G201
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-14 18:21:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-14 18:59:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-14 19:10:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-14 19:47:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
fast1994gto
2002-02-14 21:12:05 UTC
Re: Geck G201
fast1994gto
2002-02-14 21:26:08 UTC
Re: Geck G201
fast1994gto
2002-02-14 21:33:51 UTC
Re: Geck G201
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-14 21:41:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
luisguillermo98
2002-02-20 16:29:09 UTC
Re: Geck G201
fast1994gto
2002-02-20 17:31:25 UTC
Re: Geck G201
luisguillermo98
2002-02-20 20:52:15 UTC
Re: Geck G201
ballendo
2002-02-20 23:51:56 UTC
Re: Gecko G201
fast1994gto
2002-02-20 23:52:58 UTC
Re: Geck G201
luisguillermo98
2002-02-21 14:52:48 UTC
Re: Gecko G201