Re: Geck G201
Posted by
luisguillermo98
on 2002-02-20 20:52:15 UTC
so you are telling me I can not get about 30ipm with those drivers?
that's not good. I thought I could get more out of those drivers..
-- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "fast1994gto" <beking@h...> wrote:
that's not good. I thought I could get more out of those drivers..
-- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "fast1994gto" <beking@h...> wrote:
> Use decent motors, a fast enough computer, and a fast enoughcontrol
> mechanism. I run EMC on a P-III 600. I have various steppes frominteract
> Eastern Air Devices, Vexta and Superior Electric. In general, use
> lots of voltage as described elsewehere. It depends upon the
> combinations of things in the mix, and determining how they
> is in the messages archives here, the same place I got it.and
>
> There are many combinations of motors, power supplies, computers
> controllers that will work very well just so long as they all worksubsequent
> together.
>
> Note that the math below was wrong but I corrected it in a
> post.<luisguillermo98@y...>
>
>
> Barry
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "luisguillermo98"
> wrote:and
> > SO how can I get 20ipm to 30ipm with a gecko.. my system is very
> slow
> > right now.. I am not using gecko but I'll get it soon..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "fast1994gto" <beking@h...> wrote:
> > > You need this sometimes when the indexer has a hard time
> generatig
> > > the number of pulses required to actually get some speed out of
> the
> > > motors.
> > >
> > > Here's an example:
> > >
> > > Taig 2019 mill with 20 pitch leadscrew. Thats 0.05" per
> revolution
> > > of the screw or 20 turns per inch. At 10 microsteps per step
> > 200whopping
> > > steps per turn and 20 turns per inch that works out to a
> > > 40,000 pulses to go a measily inch. Let's consider an indexerproducing
> that
> > > can (only) crank out 8kHz or 8,000 pulses per second.
> > >
> > > 40,000 pulses/inch / 8,000 pulses/sec = 5 sec/inch
> > >
> > > Expressed more naturally that is 0.2 inches/sec (IPS). That
> works
> > > out to a paltry 2.4 IPM. That really sucks. You want 20-30
> IPM.
> > > That would require up to 500,000 or 500 kHz worth of pulses.
> > >
> > > Some indexers (or slower computers) will struggle with
> > thatthe
> > > many pusles. Hence the rate (pulse) multiplier. It buys you
> > > headroom on your indexer to produce fewer pulses whilstallowing
> > youdrive.
> > > to retain the advantages of the smooth microstepping Gecko
> > >
> > >
> > > Barry
> > >
> > > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., JanRwl@A... wrote:
> > > > In a message dated 14-Feb-02 11:29:09 Central Standard Time,
> > > > spambox@r... writes:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Okay, stupid newbie question: what's the multiplier do and
> why
> > do
> > > I want it?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > NOT a "stupid newbie question"! I am an OLD member, and I am
> > STILL
> > > waiting
> > > > for this same explanation myself!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
zemenz2003
2002-02-12 15:02:42 UTC
Geck G201
Art Fenerty
2002-02-12 15:14:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Geck G201
studleylee
2002-02-12 15:22:48 UTC
Re: Geck G201
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-02-12 15:57:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Geck G201
Bob Campbell
2002-02-12 16:34:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Geck G201
methadras
2002-02-12 17:37:01 UTC
Re: Geck G201
methadras
2002-02-12 17:37:56 UTC
Re: Geck G201
fast1994gto
2002-02-12 17:53:29 UTC
Re: Geck G201
studleylee
2002-02-13 09:16:05 UTC
Re: Geck G201
cadcamcenter
2002-02-13 17:46:15 UTC
Re: Geck G201
cadcamcenter
2002-02-13 17:46:15 UTC
Re: Geck G201
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-13 19:18:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
fast1994gto
2002-02-13 20:47:36 UTC
Re: Geck G201
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-13 21:30:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
fast1994gto
2002-02-13 22:16:37 UTC
Re: Geck G201
Scot Rogers
2002-02-13 23:54:03 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
Drew Rogge
2002-02-14 08:07:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
mariss92705
2002-02-14 09:12:02 UTC
Re: Geck G201
Spam Box
2002-02-14 09:28:32 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
mariss92705
2002-02-14 10:45:09 UTC
Re: Geck G201
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-14 18:21:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-14 18:59:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-14 19:10:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-14 19:47:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
fast1994gto
2002-02-14 21:12:05 UTC
Re: Geck G201
fast1994gto
2002-02-14 21:26:08 UTC
Re: Geck G201
fast1994gto
2002-02-14 21:33:51 UTC
Re: Geck G201
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-14 21:41:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201
luisguillermo98
2002-02-20 16:29:09 UTC
Re: Geck G201
fast1994gto
2002-02-20 17:31:25 UTC
Re: Geck G201
luisguillermo98
2002-02-20 20:52:15 UTC
Re: Geck G201
ballendo
2002-02-20 23:51:56 UTC
Re: Gecko G201
fast1994gto
2002-02-20 23:52:58 UTC
Re: Geck G201
luisguillermo98
2002-02-21 14:52:48 UTC
Re: Gecko G201