RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Posted by
Carol & Jerry Jankura
on 2002-02-28 09:58:26 UTC
Hi, Bill Vance:
I'd be interested in viewing the source to BC - It might be worthwhile
rewriting in Pascal to work into TurboCNC. Then, again, it may not.
Thanks for your offer.
-- Jerry
|-----Original Message-----
|From: Bill Vance [mailto:ccq@...]
|Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 9:36 AM
|To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
|Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
|
|
|Hi guys;
|
|For those using Linux, (and others if you're enough of a
|programmer), there's
|another option in "bc". Bc is an arbitrary calculator language,
|and even comes
|with an RPN version for Forth and Hewlett-Packard fans. It can do any math
|related functions and use the print command to output, for instance, G-code
|type text.
|
|I've used it for a unit conversion util I typed in from a give
|away sample card,
|and it's pretty versatile. I have the latest bells and whistles
|version GNU
|Copylefted source if you have the old, somewhat limited posix version.
|
|Bill, would posting my util for folks to try be OT here? It's two
|text files,
|one super short, and the other about as big as some of the bigger
|posts I've
|seen here.
|
|Bill
|
|
|On Thu Feb 28 01:34:59 2002, ballendo, <ballendo@...> wrote:
|
|>Guy,
|>
|>Not so fast...
|>
|>Fred SELLS CAD/CAM programs! And is definitely NOT unbiased(based on
|>posts). There are other links that "could have been used" that do not
|>cast APT in such a poor light.
|>
|>Do yourself a favor and try a search on yahoo of:
|> APT Automatically Programmed Tool CNC
|>
|>THEN, see if you're back to square one...
|>
|>Fred described the way it HAS been used. I thought you were looking
|>for the way(s) it COULD be used? (Of course if you just accept it as
|>60's technology, and not as a starting point for the new gcode your
|>first message asked for...)
|>
|>Since you originally used assembly mnemonics in your question, you
|>may find that APT works like you think. To say that it is obsolete is
|>only to say that we now have other ways of doing SIMILAR things,
|>which many consider better.
|>
|>We have "C++". Is assembly obsolete? How about BASIC?
|>
|>Did Visual C++ make C more accessible? How about creating visual APT?
|>Waht about the fact that APT is still used in the most complex types
|>of machining? Obsolete?
|>
|>Hope this helps.
|>
|>Ballendo
|>
|>
|>
|>--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Guy Sirois" <guys@w...> wrote:
|>>
|>> Woops ! Back to square one.
|>>
|>> Thanks for the warning Fred.
|>>
|>> Guy
|>>
|>> -----Original Message-----
|>> From: imserv1 [mailto:imserv@v...]
|>> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:39 PM
|>> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...
|>> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
|>>
|>>
|>> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Guy Sirois" <guys@w...> wrote:
|>> >
|>> > I would like to thank everybody who commented on my weird idea.
|>It
|>> is very
|>> > instructive to read people's opinions, which are often based on
|>> experience
|>> > and knowledge.
|>> >
|>> > I will try to learn something about this APT language, because I
|>> think it
|>> > will become very popular, sooner or later.
|>> >
|>>
|>> It was very popular before the advent of graphical interfaces. APT
|>> relies on the user having a VERY good understanding of math and
|>> formulae manipulation of geometry. It is very powerful to an
|>> educated and trained user, but extremely difficult to one with only
|>a
|>> rudimentary knowledge of machine tool geometries. There is very
|>> little visual feedback to the user to see what he has programmed.
|>>
|>> It has been mostly replaced today by Cad-Cam systems that allow the
|>> user to draw the shapes and develop G-code directly from the
|>drawing.
|>>
|>> The output from an APT system is a CL file which must be translated
|>> into G-code to work on nearly any controller, modern or ancient.
|>The
|>> translation is called post-processing. The APT is free but the
|>post
|>> processors usually are quite pricey. Many of the expensive Cad-Cam
|>> systems in use today still have an intermediary step in which they
|>> generate a CL file that is post-processed by the same postprocessor
|>> that would be used for an APT program.
|>>
|>> APT is a nearly obsolete technology today and has little practical
|>> use as compared to Cad Cam except for extremely complex 5 axis
|>> machining, which seems to be the primary remaining application of
|>APT.
|>> (very expensive)
|>>
|>> Best Regards, Fred Smith- IMService
|
|--
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|---------
|RKBA! ***** Blessings On Thee, Oh Israel! *****
| 4-19!
|----------------+----------+--------------------------+------------
|---------
|An _EFFECTIVE_ | Insured | All matter is vibration. | Let he who hath no
|weapon in every | by COLT; | -- Max Plank | weapon sell his
|hand = Freedom | DIAL | In the beginning was the | garment and buy a
|on every side! | 1911-A1. | word. -- The Bible |
|sword.--Jesus Christ
|----------------+----------+--------------------------+------------
|---------
|
| Constitutional Government is dead, LONG LIVE THE CONSTITUTION!!!!!
|
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|---------
|
|Addresses:
|FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
|FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
|
|OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
|http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
|http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
|
|Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
|Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
|Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
|List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
|Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
|URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
|bill,
|List Mom
|List Owner
|
|
|
|Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
|
|
I'd be interested in viewing the source to BC - It might be worthwhile
rewriting in Pascal to work into TurboCNC. Then, again, it may not.
Thanks for your offer.
-- Jerry
|-----Original Message-----
|From: Bill Vance [mailto:ccq@...]
|Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 9:36 AM
|To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
|Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
|
|
|Hi guys;
|
|For those using Linux, (and others if you're enough of a
|programmer), there's
|another option in "bc". Bc is an arbitrary calculator language,
|and even comes
|with an RPN version for Forth and Hewlett-Packard fans. It can do any math
|related functions and use the print command to output, for instance, G-code
|type text.
|
|I've used it for a unit conversion util I typed in from a give
|away sample card,
|and it's pretty versatile. I have the latest bells and whistles
|version GNU
|Copylefted source if you have the old, somewhat limited posix version.
|
|Bill, would posting my util for folks to try be OT here? It's two
|text files,
|one super short, and the other about as big as some of the bigger
|posts I've
|seen here.
|
|Bill
|
|
|On Thu Feb 28 01:34:59 2002, ballendo, <ballendo@...> wrote:
|
|>Guy,
|>
|>Not so fast...
|>
|>Fred SELLS CAD/CAM programs! And is definitely NOT unbiased(based on
|>posts). There are other links that "could have been used" that do not
|>cast APT in such a poor light.
|>
|>Do yourself a favor and try a search on yahoo of:
|> APT Automatically Programmed Tool CNC
|>
|>THEN, see if you're back to square one...
|>
|>Fred described the way it HAS been used. I thought you were looking
|>for the way(s) it COULD be used? (Of course if you just accept it as
|>60's technology, and not as a starting point for the new gcode your
|>first message asked for...)
|>
|>Since you originally used assembly mnemonics in your question, you
|>may find that APT works like you think. To say that it is obsolete is
|>only to say that we now have other ways of doing SIMILAR things,
|>which many consider better.
|>
|>We have "C++". Is assembly obsolete? How about BASIC?
|>
|>Did Visual C++ make C more accessible? How about creating visual APT?
|>Waht about the fact that APT is still used in the most complex types
|>of machining? Obsolete?
|>
|>Hope this helps.
|>
|>Ballendo
|>
|>
|>
|>--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Guy Sirois" <guys@w...> wrote:
|>>
|>> Woops ! Back to square one.
|>>
|>> Thanks for the warning Fred.
|>>
|>> Guy
|>>
|>> -----Original Message-----
|>> From: imserv1 [mailto:imserv@v...]
|>> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:39 PM
|>> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...
|>> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
|>>
|>>
|>> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Guy Sirois" <guys@w...> wrote:
|>> >
|>> > I would like to thank everybody who commented on my weird idea.
|>It
|>> is very
|>> > instructive to read people's opinions, which are often based on
|>> experience
|>> > and knowledge.
|>> >
|>> > I will try to learn something about this APT language, because I
|>> think it
|>> > will become very popular, sooner or later.
|>> >
|>>
|>> It was very popular before the advent of graphical interfaces. APT
|>> relies on the user having a VERY good understanding of math and
|>> formulae manipulation of geometry. It is very powerful to an
|>> educated and trained user, but extremely difficult to one with only
|>a
|>> rudimentary knowledge of machine tool geometries. There is very
|>> little visual feedback to the user to see what he has programmed.
|>>
|>> It has been mostly replaced today by Cad-Cam systems that allow the
|>> user to draw the shapes and develop G-code directly from the
|>drawing.
|>>
|>> The output from an APT system is a CL file which must be translated
|>> into G-code to work on nearly any controller, modern or ancient.
|>The
|>> translation is called post-processing. The APT is free but the
|>post
|>> processors usually are quite pricey. Many of the expensive Cad-Cam
|>> systems in use today still have an intermediary step in which they
|>> generate a CL file that is post-processed by the same postprocessor
|>> that would be used for an APT program.
|>>
|>> APT is a nearly obsolete technology today and has little practical
|>> use as compared to Cad Cam except for extremely complex 5 axis
|>> machining, which seems to be the primary remaining application of
|>APT.
|>> (very expensive)
|>>
|>> Best Regards, Fred Smith- IMService
|
|--
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|---------
|RKBA! ***** Blessings On Thee, Oh Israel! *****
| 4-19!
|----------------+----------+--------------------------+------------
|---------
|An _EFFECTIVE_ | Insured | All matter is vibration. | Let he who hath no
|weapon in every | by COLT; | -- Max Plank | weapon sell his
|hand = Freedom | DIAL | In the beginning was the | garment and buy a
|on every side! | 1911-A1. | word. -- The Bible |
|sword.--Jesus Christ
|----------------+----------+--------------------------+------------
|---------
|
| Constitutional Government is dead, LONG LIVE THE CONSTITUTION!!!!!
|
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|---------
|
|Addresses:
|FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
|FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
|
|OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
|http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
|http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
|
|Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
|Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
|Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
|List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
|Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
|URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
|bill,
|List Mom
|List Owner
|
|
|
|Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
|
|
Discussion Thread
Guy Sirois
2002-02-25 09:01:12 UTC
G-code---for the new millenium
Paul Amaranth
2002-02-25 09:20:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code---for the new millenium
Jon Elson
2002-02-25 09:31:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code---for the new millenium
Kevin P. Martin
2002-02-25 09:33:00 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code---for the new millenium
stephen_stallings
2002-02-25 09:36:15 UTC
Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-02-25 09:37:11 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code---for the new millenium
audiomaker2000
2002-02-25 11:17:21 UTC
Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Chris L
2002-02-25 19:46:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code---for the new millenium
ballendo
2002-02-26 03:13:03 UTC
Re: G-code---for the new millenium
ballendo
2002-02-26 03:38:55 UTC
Re: G-code---for the new millenium
wanliker@a...
2002-02-26 07:04:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Tony Jeffree
2002-02-26 09:11:10 UTC
Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Guy Sirois
2002-02-26 12:57:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
imserv1
2002-02-26 14:39:32 UTC
Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Guy Sirois
2002-02-26 15:46:38 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
imserv1
2002-02-26 19:05:17 UTC
Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Raymond Heckert
2002-02-26 19:48:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
catboat15@a...
2002-02-27 13:28:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
ballendo
2002-02-28 00:22:59 UTC
APT shareware was Re: G-code---for the new millenium
ballendo
2002-02-28 00:33:14 UTC
OT re: Dragon was Re: G-code---for the new millenium
ballendo
2002-02-28 01:35:02 UTC
Re: G-code---for the new millenium
imserv1
2002-02-28 07:12:59 UTC
Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Guy Sirois
2002-02-28 08:00:05 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Guy Sirois
2002-02-28 08:15:42 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Kevin P. Martin
2002-02-28 09:28:38 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Bill Vance
2002-02-28 09:36:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-02-28 09:58:26 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Bill Vance
2002-02-28 10:22:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
myjakjs
2002-02-28 13:20:31 UTC
Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Guy Sirois
2002-02-28 14:36:45 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Guy Sirois
2002-02-28 15:17:32 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
ballendo
2002-03-01 01:07:03 UTC
Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Guy Sirois
2002-03-01 07:38:35 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Hugh Currin
2002-03-01 07:52:50 UTC
Re: G-code---for the new millenium
myjakjs
2002-03-01 10:35:39 UTC
Re: G-code---for the new millenium
ballendo
2002-03-02 03:49:53 UTC
Re: G-code---for the new millenium
ballendo
2002-03-02 04:11:04 UTC
Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-03-02 06:13:53 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
grouchy_old_fred
2002-03-02 15:32:30 UTC
Re: G-code---for the new millenium
catboat15@a...
2002-03-02 21:34:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Chris Clough
2002-03-03 14:02:06 UTC
US Digtal Encoders - Just a follow up
Lew
2002-03-03 15:23:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] US Digtal Encoders - Just a follow up
Chris Clough
2002-03-03 15:26:08 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] US Digtal Encoders - Just a follow up
Lew
2002-03-03 15:35:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] US Digtal Encoders - Just a follow up
Kevin P. Martin
2002-03-05 21:35:04 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-03-06 05:47:58 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Bill Vance
2002-03-06 07:49:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium
Terry L. Ridder
2002-03-06 08:14:50 UTC
real time extensions for ms windows ( was G-code---for the new millenium )
Bill Vance
2002-03-06 19:02:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] real time extensions for ms windows ( was G-code---for the new
Kevin P. Martin
2002-03-07 00:35:27 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-code---for the new millenium