CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tuning EMC

Posted by Tim Goldstein
on 2002-05-20 20:48:51 UTC
This is confusing. Steppermod.o takes less resources and will put out a
faster pulse stream than freqmod.o. I am running on a K6 500 (may be a
450) and using steppermod.o. With the same parameters as you have I am
moving at 120 ipm with the mouse responding just fine. Of course I am on
RedHat 5.2 without the resource suck of KDE.

Tim
[Denver, CO]


> -----Original Message-----
> I don't use steppermod because it couldn't handle the input output
> resolution of 10,000 (250 cpr, 2:1 belt reduction, 5 tpi
> leadscrew) (the computer is really sluggish even the mouse
> moved really slow)

Discussion Thread

mjf462001 2002-05-19 09:14:45 UTC Tuning EMC Nic van der Walt 2002-05-19 19:58:48 UTC Servo drivers Jon Elson 2002-05-19 23:19:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Tuning EMC Jon Elson 2002-05-19 23:33:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Servo drivers Nic van der Walt 2002-05-20 02:31:49 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Servo drivers Jon Elson 2002-05-20 09:31:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Servo drivers mjf462001 2002-05-20 20:43:45 UTC Re: Tuning EMC Tim Goldstein 2002-05-20 20:48:51 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tuning EMC Jon Elson 2002-05-20 23:12:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tuning EMC Tim Goldstein 2002-05-20 23:17:24 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tuning EMC Ray Henry 2002-05-21 07:01:11 UTC Re: Re: Tuning EMC j.guenther 2002-05-21 07:19:52 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Tuning EMC Jon Elson 2002-05-21 10:18:40 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tuning EMC nahydro 2002-05-21 15:41:47 UTC Re: Tuning EMC Jon Elson 2002-05-21 21:43:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tuning EMC mjf462001 2002-05-22 10:03:52 UTC Re: Tuning EMC nahydro 2002-05-22 18:24:43 UTC Re: Tuning EMC