RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tuning EMC
Posted by
Tim Goldstein
on 2002-05-20 20:48:51 UTC
This is confusing. Steppermod.o takes less resources and will put out a
faster pulse stream than freqmod.o. I am running on a K6 500 (may be a
450) and using steppermod.o. With the same parameters as you have I am
moving at 120 ipm with the mouse responding just fine. Of course I am on
RedHat 5.2 without the resource suck of KDE.
Tim
[Denver, CO]
faster pulse stream than freqmod.o. I am running on a K6 500 (may be a
450) and using steppermod.o. With the same parameters as you have I am
moving at 120 ipm with the mouse responding just fine. Of course I am on
RedHat 5.2 without the resource suck of KDE.
Tim
[Denver, CO]
> -----Original Message-----
> I don't use steppermod because it couldn't handle the input output
> resolution of 10,000 (250 cpr, 2:1 belt reduction, 5 tpi
> leadscrew) (the computer is really sluggish even the mouse
> moved really slow)
Discussion Thread
mjf462001
2002-05-19 09:14:45 UTC
Tuning EMC
Nic van der Walt
2002-05-19 19:58:48 UTC
Servo drivers
Jon Elson
2002-05-19 23:19:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Tuning EMC
Jon Elson
2002-05-19 23:33:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Servo drivers
Nic van der Walt
2002-05-20 02:31:49 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Servo drivers
Jon Elson
2002-05-20 09:31:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Servo drivers
mjf462001
2002-05-20 20:43:45 UTC
Re: Tuning EMC
Tim Goldstein
2002-05-20 20:48:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tuning EMC
Jon Elson
2002-05-20 23:12:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tuning EMC
Tim Goldstein
2002-05-20 23:17:24 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tuning EMC
Ray Henry
2002-05-21 07:01:11 UTC
Re: Re: Tuning EMC
j.guenther
2002-05-21 07:19:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Tuning EMC
Jon Elson
2002-05-21 10:18:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tuning EMC
nahydro
2002-05-21 15:41:47 UTC
Re: Tuning EMC
Jon Elson
2002-05-21 21:43:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tuning EMC
mjf462001
2002-05-22 10:03:52 UTC
Re: Tuning EMC
nahydro
2002-05-22 18:24:43 UTC
Re: Tuning EMC