Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM troubles
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2003-08-10 23:08:33 UTC
turbulatordude wrote:
oxides can form that will degrade the operation. But, the polarizing
voltage
is supposed to be enough to burn through it.
What voltage are you running? What dielectric? How are you advancing
the electrode? It is VERY sensitive to MICROSCOPIC movements.
I use my CNC system, which has encoder resolution of .000025" (no
typo, that's 25 micro-inches) in the Z axis. I leaned on the head of the
machine (Bridgeport) to modulate the gap and break shorts! When I
was working with this, I didn't have a dielectric flushing system, and so
I rotated the electrode at about 60 RPM with the mill spindle. This
helped keep the burn even and flush the dirt somewhat.
If your dielectric is black, you may need a flushing system, which feeds
dielectric through a hollow electrode.
Jon
>Hi all,If your dielectric is hydrocarbon, then definitely yes. Otherwise, metal
>
>simple RC EDM unit. after test drilling some holes in steel with a
>copper electrode, I pulled the electrode out mid spark to inspect the
>progress and now it does not start to spark easily.
>
>It went from full voltage to sparking voltage without a spark, then
>quickly went to a short.
>
>do the electrodes get dirty with carbon ?
>
>
oxides can form that will degrade the operation. But, the polarizing
voltage
is supposed to be enough to burn through it.
What voltage are you running? What dielectric? How are you advancing
the electrode? It is VERY sensitive to MICROSCOPIC movements.
I use my CNC system, which has encoder resolution of .000025" (no
typo, that's 25 micro-inches) in the Z axis. I leaned on the head of the
machine (Bridgeport) to modulate the gap and break shorts! When I
was working with this, I didn't have a dielectric flushing system, and so
I rotated the electrode at about 60 RPM with the mill spindle. This
helped keep the burn even and flush the dirt somewhat.
If your dielectric is black, you may need a flushing system, which feeds
dielectric through a hollow electrode.
Jon
Discussion Thread
turbulatordude
2003-08-10 16:29:00 UTC
EDM troubles
Zafar Salam
2003-08-10 21:14:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM troubles
tomp_tag
2003-08-10 21:44:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM troubles
Jon Elson
2003-08-10 23:08:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM troubles
turbulatordude
2003-08-11 06:58:31 UTC
Re: EDM troubles
Jon Elson
2003-08-11 09:41:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM troubles
Andrew Mawson
2003-08-11 09:57:06 UTC
Re: EDM troubles
turbulatordude
2003-08-11 12:28:37 UTC
Re: EDM troubles
turbulatordude
2003-08-11 12:48:26 UTC
Re: EDM troubles
Richard
2003-08-11 16:39:52 UTC
Re: EDM troubles
turbulatordude
2003-08-11 19:50:11 UTC
Re: EDM troubles
tomp_tag
2003-08-11 22:39:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM troubles
turbulatordude
2003-08-23 05:22:50 UTC
Re: EDM troubles - update
tomp_tag
2003-08-23 23:19:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM troubles - update
turbulatordude
2003-08-24 07:23:09 UTC
Re: EDM troubles - update
Richard
2003-08-24 08:26:26 UTC
Re: EDM troubles - update
tomp_tag
2003-08-24 11:37:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM troubles - update
turbulatordude
2003-08-24 14:26:59 UTC
Re: EDM troubles - update
turbulatordude
2003-08-24 14:33:25 UTC
Re: EDM troubles - update