Re:Re: Encoders
Posted by
Tim Goldstein
on 2003-12-24 21:45:45 UTC
Gecko step and direction servo drives don't seem to care about the pulse
spacing. The pulses just drive an accumulator that is used to drive an
comparator. The other side of the comparator is driven by an accumulator
that is drive from the encoder. The comparator provides the error signal
to drive the servo amp section (this is not a detailed analysis of how a
G320 works, just a high level view). So you don't have the problems you
see with steppers being driven with an erratic pulse.
As far as the encoder count, I aim for a step increment of about .0001 -
.0002" with G320s. So you have to look at any reduction between the
motor and the screw along with the screw pitch and figure out what you
should use.
Tim
[Denver, CO]
Visual Mill 5.0 Basic at a price too low to post!
Sherline & Taig products at Deep Discount
Mach1 & DeskCNC with credit card ordering
www.KTMarketing.com/Sherline
Timg@...
----------------------Original message-----------
If you are driving the screw direct I would not go
any less then 500 cpr = 2000 pulses per revolution
i guess up to 1000 cpr would probably work but may
get close to the limits of the software.
Keep in mind that as you aproch the software limitations
the pulse train spacing will get more erratic and
depending on the tolerance of your drivers and motors to
this you may not be able to get as fast as the software
claims you could theoretically go.
If you are using pulleys or any other form of further reduction
reduce my recommedations by this ratio also.
Good Luck
spacing. The pulses just drive an accumulator that is used to drive an
comparator. The other side of the comparator is driven by an accumulator
that is drive from the encoder. The comparator provides the error signal
to drive the servo amp section (this is not a detailed analysis of how a
G320 works, just a high level view). So you don't have the problems you
see with steppers being driven with an erratic pulse.
As far as the encoder count, I aim for a step increment of about .0001 -
.0002" with G320s. So you have to look at any reduction between the
motor and the screw along with the screw pitch and figure out what you
should use.
Tim
[Denver, CO]
Visual Mill 5.0 Basic at a price too low to post!
Sherline & Taig products at Deep Discount
Mach1 & DeskCNC with credit card ordering
www.KTMarketing.com/Sherline
Timg@...
----------------------Original message-----------
If you are driving the screw direct I would not go
any less then 500 cpr = 2000 pulses per revolution
i guess up to 1000 cpr would probably work but may
get close to the limits of the software.
Keep in mind that as you aproch the software limitations
the pulse train spacing will get more erratic and
depending on the tolerance of your drivers and motors to
this you may not be able to get as fast as the software
claims you could theoretically go.
If you are using pulleys or any other form of further reduction
reduce my recommedations by this ratio also.
Good Luck
Discussion Thread
Jon Elson
1999-06-28 23:31:30 UTC
Re: Encoders
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-29 16:27:22 UTC
Re: Encoders
Jon Elson
1999-06-29 23:25:29 UTC
Re: Encoders
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-30 08:08:50 UTC
Re: Encoders
Dan Mauch
1999-06-30 08:40:01 UTC
Re: Encoders
Jon Elson
1999-06-30 23:04:21 UTC
Re: Encoders
Laverne Karras
1999-07-01 18:26:50 UTC
Re: Encoders
Ron Brown
1999-07-11 07:03:23 UTC
Encoders
Ted Robbins
1999-07-15 10:16:02 UTC
Encoders
William Scalione
2000-06-15 18:40:55 UTC
Encoders
Ian Wright
2001-08-27 05:27:33 UTC
Encoders
Jon Elson
2001-08-27 11:46:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
Ian Wright
2001-08-27 12:47:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-27 12:51:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
Jon Elson
2001-08-27 21:15:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
Joseph
2001-08-27 22:47:10 UTC
Re: Encoders
Frank Cohn
2001-10-16 01:46:03 UTC
Encoders
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-10-16 10:41:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
marble_h
2002-02-02 19:21:24 UTC
Encoders
Lew
2002-02-02 19:29:54 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
marble_h
2002-02-02 19:53:40 UTC
Re: Encoders
Francisco Simon
2002-10-11 02:56:36 UTC
Encoders
dakota8833
2002-10-11 06:43:24 UTC
Re: Encoders
marc_e_davis
2002-11-20 11:23:29 UTC
Encoders
deanc500
2002-11-20 11:55:35 UTC
Re: Encoders
Tim Goldstein
2002-11-20 12:44:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
Bob Simon
2002-11-20 16:52:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
Jon Elson
2002-11-20 21:26:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
Tim Goldstein
2003-12-24 21:45:45 UTC
Re:Re: Encoders
Tony Jeffree
2003-12-25 00:02:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Encoders
Tim Goldstein
2003-12-25 09:02:30 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
Jon Elson
2003-12-25 11:21:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Encoders
Gregory Kamysz
2003-12-25 13:57:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Encoders
Tony Jeffree
2003-12-25 15:20:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
Bruce Pigeon
2005-02-15 09:07:58 UTC
Encoders
Ron Kline
2005-02-15 18:01:48 UTC
Caps ??
Dave Fisher
2005-02-15 18:19:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Caps ??
R Rogers
2005-02-15 18:19:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Caps ??
JanRwl@A...
2005-02-16 16:41:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Caps ??
Robert Campbell
2005-02-16 16:48:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Caps ??
JanRwl@A...
2005-02-16 22:40:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Caps ??
pwshahood
2005-02-17 10:45:30 UTC
Re: Caps ??