Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Encoders
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2003-12-25 11:21:06 UTC
Tony Jeffree wrote:
in one
direction, and the motor has a 250 cycle/rev encoder (which gives 1000
counts
/rev) the motor will turn the encoder one revolution, exactly. If the
motor is
directly coupled to the encoder, they both move one turn. If the motor was
driving something with a belt reduction, say, and the encoder was on the
driven part, then the encoder would make the one revolution, and the
motor would
turn whatever amount was needed to make the encoder do that.
The G340 is the same as the G320, plus a step multiplier. So, you can
multiply
the steps input to it by 2, 5 or 10. So, with the multiplier set for X
5, then you
could give it 200 step pulses to get the 1000 encoder counts of movement.
The advantage to this is that mtors with high encoder resolution can be
made to
spin fast without requiring high step rates from the computer. The
disadvantage,
of course, is lower resolution of the movement.
Jon
>Tim -With the G320, the steps in = encoder counts. If you give it 1000 steps
>
>With G320 & G340, what is the relationship between the number of steps
>input, the encoder resolution, and the resultant motor movement? The
>literature on the Gecko website doesn't seem to make any statements about
>this that I can find.
>
>
in one
direction, and the motor has a 250 cycle/rev encoder (which gives 1000
counts
/rev) the motor will turn the encoder one revolution, exactly. If the
motor is
directly coupled to the encoder, they both move one turn. If the motor was
driving something with a belt reduction, say, and the encoder was on the
driven part, then the encoder would make the one revolution, and the
motor would
turn whatever amount was needed to make the encoder do that.
The G340 is the same as the G320, plus a step multiplier. So, you can
multiply
the steps input to it by 2, 5 or 10. So, with the multiplier set for X
5, then you
could give it 200 step pulses to get the 1000 encoder counts of movement.
The advantage to this is that mtors with high encoder resolution can be
made to
spin fast without requiring high step rates from the computer. The
disadvantage,
of course, is lower resolution of the movement.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Jon Elson
1999-06-28 23:31:30 UTC
Re: Encoders
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-29 16:27:22 UTC
Re: Encoders
Jon Elson
1999-06-29 23:25:29 UTC
Re: Encoders
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-30 08:08:50 UTC
Re: Encoders
Dan Mauch
1999-06-30 08:40:01 UTC
Re: Encoders
Jon Elson
1999-06-30 23:04:21 UTC
Re: Encoders
Laverne Karras
1999-07-01 18:26:50 UTC
Re: Encoders
Ron Brown
1999-07-11 07:03:23 UTC
Encoders
Ted Robbins
1999-07-15 10:16:02 UTC
Encoders
William Scalione
2000-06-15 18:40:55 UTC
Encoders
Ian Wright
2001-08-27 05:27:33 UTC
Encoders
Jon Elson
2001-08-27 11:46:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
Ian Wright
2001-08-27 12:47:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-27 12:51:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
Jon Elson
2001-08-27 21:15:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
Joseph
2001-08-27 22:47:10 UTC
Re: Encoders
Frank Cohn
2001-10-16 01:46:03 UTC
Encoders
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-10-16 10:41:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
marble_h
2002-02-02 19:21:24 UTC
Encoders
Lew
2002-02-02 19:29:54 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
marble_h
2002-02-02 19:53:40 UTC
Re: Encoders
Francisco Simon
2002-10-11 02:56:36 UTC
Encoders
dakota8833
2002-10-11 06:43:24 UTC
Re: Encoders
marc_e_davis
2002-11-20 11:23:29 UTC
Encoders
deanc500
2002-11-20 11:55:35 UTC
Re: Encoders
Tim Goldstein
2002-11-20 12:44:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
Bob Simon
2002-11-20 16:52:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
Jon Elson
2002-11-20 21:26:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
Tim Goldstein
2003-12-24 21:45:45 UTC
Re:Re: Encoders
Tony Jeffree
2003-12-25 00:02:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Encoders
Tim Goldstein
2003-12-25 09:02:30 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
Jon Elson
2003-12-25 11:21:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Encoders
Gregory Kamysz
2003-12-25 13:57:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Encoders
Tony Jeffree
2003-12-25 15:20:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Encoders
Bruce Pigeon
2005-02-15 09:07:58 UTC
Encoders
Ron Kline
2005-02-15 18:01:48 UTC
Caps ??
Dave Fisher
2005-02-15 18:19:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Caps ??
R Rogers
2005-02-15 18:19:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Caps ??
JanRwl@A...
2005-02-16 16:41:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Caps ??
Robert Campbell
2005-02-16 16:48:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Caps ??
JanRwl@A...
2005-02-16 22:40:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Caps ??
pwshahood
2005-02-17 10:45:30 UTC
Re: Caps ??