Re: wiring Gecko drivers
Posted by
theokspindoctor
on 2004-08-16 21:49:37 UTC
Jan, thanks! I think that will solve my problem. Tonight I rewired
my z axis and burned the Gecko drive. Tomorrow I will order a new
210 and the multiplex chips for the other 2 201s to convert to
210s. Does it make sense that the old Bridgeport motors can't
handle the high rate or is it a problem of how I wired the motor.
Do you think the 201s should be able to move a 200 step rev motor at
over 60 ipm. Mine now stall at 20 ipm.
thanks
keith clark
clarkfamily5@...
my z axis and burned the Gecko drive. Tomorrow I will order a new
210 and the multiplex chips for the other 2 201s to convert to
210s. Does it make sense that the old Bridgeport motors can't
handle the high rate or is it a problem of how I wired the motor.
Do you think the 201s should be able to move a 200 step rev motor at
over 60 ipm. Mine now stall at 20 ipm.
thanks
keith clark
clarkfamily5@...
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, JanRwl@A... wrote:
> In a message dated 8/16/2004 11:13:59 PM Central Standard Time,
> mail@t... writes:
> It seems from the Gecko website that instead of fewer pulses the
210 can put
> up to 10 times more ( up to 20000 steps per revolution), so that
will not
> solve my problem.<<
> I do recall that wording is confusing. The "times 10" is the
maximum number
> of "steps" the 210 can output, per pulse received from your
controller. But
> these are "microsteps". Think of them as "bumps" on a sine-wave.
With the
> "times-10" setting, the controller (computer) has to output 2000
pulses to make a
> "200 step" motor rotate ONE turn. Dunno WHERE you got the 20,000
number.
> The 201 can ONLY take in 2000 steps for one full turn, but the
jumpers under the
> cover on the 210 can be changed for 200, 400, 800, and 2000 pulses
per turn
> (as I recall). The Gecko drives are nifty in that they will STILL
ouput this
> "microstepping" even if strapped for only 200 steps per turn, so
the rotation
> is less choppy, but only 200 pulses IN make 200 steps OUT. Yeah,
took ME, a
> primitive old "200 step guy" a couple hours to figure this out in
my tiny head,
> but finally, "I'm there!".
> Am I correct in this assumption?<<
> No.
> Or is it that it can go down to 200 steps per rev which would
be better
> for me.<<
> As I said, the 210 CAN do this. The 201 is "stuck with" 2000
steps per turn,
> so the computer has to "output" pulses ten times as fast for
a "200-step
> motor", but this has advantages in many applications! Smoother,
finer
> resolution/precision, etc. Requires "patience, and knowin'
whatcha doin'!"
>
> Jan Rowland
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
theokspindoctor
2004-08-16 20:05:47 UTC
wiring Gecko drivers
Robert Williams
2004-08-16 20:48:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] wiring Gecko drivers
theokspindoctor
2004-08-16 21:00:04 UTC
Re: wiring Gecko drivers
theokspindoctor
2004-08-16 21:12:13 UTC
Re: wiring Gecko drivers
Robert Williams
2004-08-16 21:23:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: wiring Gecko drivers
JanRwl@A...
2004-08-16 21:32:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: wiring Gecko drivers
theokspindoctor
2004-08-16 21:44:31 UTC
Re: wiring Gecko drivers
Jon Elson
2004-08-16 21:46:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: wiring Gecko drivers
theokspindoctor
2004-08-16 21:49:37 UTC
Re: wiring Gecko drivers
theokspindoctor
2004-08-16 22:15:40 UTC
Re: burning Gecko drive
turbulatordude
2004-08-16 23:39:07 UTC
Re: burning Gecko drive
turbulatordude
2004-08-16 23:45:12 UTC
Re: wiring Gecko drivers - power
turbulatordude
2004-08-16 23:50:40 UTC
Re: wiring Gecko drivers - light bulb
turbulatordude
2004-08-16 23:52:12 UTC
Re: wiring Gecko drivers - Bullet Proof Geckos ?
Les Newell
2004-08-17 01:57:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: burning Gecko drive
theokspindoctor
2004-08-17 05:23:37 UTC
Re: burning Gecko drive
Robert Williams
2004-08-17 06:25:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: burning Gecko drive
Robert Williams
2004-08-17 07:03:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: wiring Gecko drivers
Dan Mauch
2004-08-17 07:31:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: wiring Gecko drivers - Bullet Proof Geckos ?
Jon Elson
2004-08-17 10:15:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: wiring Gecko drivers
Jon Elson
2004-08-17 10:18:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: wiring Gecko drivers
Jon Elson
2004-08-17 10:24:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: burning Gecko drive
Jon Elson
2004-08-17 10:33:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: burning Gecko drive
Les Newell
2004-08-17 11:33:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: burning Gecko drive
vavaroutsos
2004-08-17 11:34:08 UTC
Re: burning Gecko drive
turbulatordude
2004-08-17 13:42:29 UTC
Re: wiring Gecko drivers - possibley bad steps
JanRwl@A...
2004-08-17 14:12:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: wiring Gecko drivers
Stephen Wille Padnos
2004-08-17 14:18:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: wiring Gecko drivers
theokspindoctor
2004-08-17 18:07:17 UTC
Re: wiring Gecko drivers
Jon Elson
2004-08-17 18:42:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: burning Gecko drive
JanRwl@A...
2004-08-17 20:50:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: wiring Gecko drivers
theokspindoctor
2004-08-17 22:50:57 UTC
Re: wiring Gecko drivers
Les Newell
2004-08-18 01:22:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: wiring Gecko drivers