Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Posted by
Brian
on 2005-02-06 18:26:22 UTC
right Dennis, except some armatures have the poles turned to favor one
direction. very hard to get them to run the same in both directions. I tried
to reverse a Bodine Motor for a spindle motor, the brushes lasted 20 hours
till gone. unless i change the iron on the rotor and rewind it will always
go in one direction. cul brian f.
direction. very hard to get them to run the same in both directions. I tried
to reverse a Bodine Motor for a spindle motor, the brushes lasted 20 hours
till gone. unless i change the iron on the rotor and rewind it will always
go in one direction. cul brian f.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Denis Casserly" <denisc@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport servo motors
>
> Re the brush angle
> I could be wrong, been out of school for a long time, but
> the brushes might be placed at this angle in order to reduce the affects
of
> armature reaction which is an 'S' shaped distortion of the main field flux
> due to current flowing in the field windings. Armature reaction varies
> directly with the current flowing through the field windings and causes
the
> nuetral plane of the brushes to shift in the same direction as the
rotating
> armature. The motor will rotate in the opposite direction but there will
be
> excessive sparking at the brushes, the commutator will take a real
beating,
> and the output power will be reduced. The brush angle may have been
shifted
> optimally away from the nuetral plane so that the motor application will
> handle a constant load in that rotation direction and also deliver maximum
> power, because the affects of armature reaction also impact slightly on
> output power.
> If you were to remove the end bell and shift the brushes back to the
nuetral
> plane you might find it would deliver the same performance in both
directions
> with minimum sparking.
> cheers,
> Denis Casserly
>
>
> On February 4, 2005 10:44 pm, Jon Elson wrote:
> > braidmeister wrote:
> > >Scott,
> > >Unfortunately...It is correct...they ARE CCW...#$^%^(*()&$!!!!
> > >
> > >I just called them and the tech opened up the motor and looked at the
> > >brushes. He said that it did sound different running it forwards or
> > >backwards...BUT the brushes were angled...and there is no easy way to
> > >get them timed for both directs.
> > >
> > >WHAT A HUGE DISAPPOINTMENT!!!
> > >
> > >So now...back to freakin' square 1. I would be interested in other
> > >types of motors than these or the Ameteks (too slow). Anybody got a
> > >source for 3 that will work at a decent price? (Decent meaning better
> > >than $400 ea)
> > >
> > >SO here's a question for you people: Since Surplus Center advertised
> > >the motors as bi-directional, who pays for the shipping up and back?
> > >Why should I have to pay shipping on something that was falsely
> > >advertised?
> >
> > No doubt the brushes are run in in one direction, due to the intended
use
> > of the motors. But, that doesn't mean they CAN'T be run the other
> > direction.
> > You might have slightly faster brush wear with this setup, but it may be
> > almost
> > insignificant. If you run it both directions, the brushes will likely
> > change their
> > fit slightly, and the difference in sound will stop. It might be a good
> > idea to adjust
> > the brush holders (I'm guessing these are cheaply made motors, with
stamped
> > brass brush holders riveted to a phenolic card or something similar.)
> > If the
> > brushes rock in the holders when you reverse direction, this will make
> > for poor
> > fit between the brush and commutator, So, you might want to make sure
> > the brush holders grip the sides of the brush well enough to minimize
the
> > rocking. Other than that, they most likely will work OK.
> >
> > As for return, if you lean on them, they might agree to a UPS "call tag"
> > where they pay the shipping to return the items. You've probably got a
> > couple days to research it and see if anyone is using them in reversing
> > operation
> > without trouble.
> >
> > Why are the Ameteks too slow? Given a suitable power supply, I think
> > they can
> > do OK.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> >
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> > Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
> > timg@... Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@...
> > davemucha@... [Moderators] URL to this group:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> >
> > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> > aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it
if
> > you have trouble. http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
> > sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there,
for
> > OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
> >
> > NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
> > DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........ bill
> > List Mom
> > List Owner
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@...
[Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Discussion Thread
a57chevytruckguy
2005-02-02 16:51:52 UTC
age old question
R Rogers
2005-02-02 17:53:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] age old question
Jon Elson
2005-02-02 21:12:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] age old question
bank haam
2005-02-02 22:20:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] age old question
a57chevytruckguy
2005-02-03 04:51:52 UTC
Re: age old question
William Carrothers
2005-02-03 06:56:12 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: age old question
Dan Mauch
2005-02-03 07:35:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: age old question
Jon Elson
2005-02-03 09:38:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: age old question
a57chevytruckguy
2005-02-03 15:51:44 UTC
Re: age old question
cnc_4_me
2005-02-03 16:23:42 UTC
Re: age old question
a57chevytruckguy
2005-02-03 16:42:29 UTC
Re: age old question
cnc_4_me
2005-02-03 17:24:42 UTC
Re: age old question
R Rogers
2005-02-03 17:39:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: age old question
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-02-03 17:43:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: age old question
a57chevytruckguy
2005-02-03 17:46:06 UTC
Re: age old question
Mariss Freimanis
2005-02-03 18:15:24 UTC
Re: age old question
Jon Elson
2005-02-03 18:20:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: age old question
cnc_4_me
2005-02-03 19:11:09 UTC
Re: age old question
doug98105
2005-02-03 19:52:59 UTC
Re: age old question
Mariss Freimanis
2005-02-03 20:16:44 UTC
Re: age old question
cnc_4_me
2005-02-03 21:24:11 UTC
Re: age old question
Mariss Freimanis
2005-02-03 21:31:56 UTC
Re: age old question
Jon Elson
2005-02-03 21:54:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: age old question
Jon Elson
2005-02-03 22:06:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: age old question
doug98105
2005-02-04 04:14:12 UTC
Re: age old question
Polaraligned
2005-02-04 05:21:19 UTC
Bridgeport servo motors
doug98105
2005-02-04 05:52:57 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
R Rogers
2005-02-04 07:16:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Dan Mauch
2005-02-04 07:25:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: age old question
cnc_4_me
2005-02-04 07:25:30 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Dan Mauch
2005-02-04 07:27:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: age old question
Dan Mauch
2005-02-04 07:27:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: age old question
Dan Mauch
2005-02-04 07:43:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport servo motors
R Rogers
2005-02-04 07:53:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: age old question
cnc_4_me
2005-02-04 08:02:37 UTC
Re: age old question
braidmeister
2005-02-04 08:46:51 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
jlsmith269
2005-02-04 09:07:36 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Ed Fanta
2005-02-04 09:12:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Jon Elson
2005-02-04 09:28:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport servo motors
Dan Mauch
2005-02-04 09:37:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: age old question
cnc_4_me
2005-02-04 09:41:45 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
braidmeister
2005-02-04 09:52:21 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
cnc_4_me
2005-02-04 10:00:41 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Polaraligned
2005-02-04 10:37:46 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
braidmeister
2005-02-04 10:49:26 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Polaraligned
2005-02-04 10:50:15 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
braidmeister
2005-02-04 10:52:20 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Polaraligned
2005-02-04 11:03:45 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Polaraligned
2005-02-04 11:18:12 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
cnc_4_me
2005-02-04 11:19:50 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
cnc_4_me
2005-02-04 11:49:51 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Polaraligned
2005-02-04 12:28:57 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
cnc_4_me
2005-02-04 12:59:20 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
braidmeister
2005-02-04 12:59:46 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Dan Mauch
2005-02-04 12:59:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Polaraligned
2005-02-04 13:07:07 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
cnc_4_me
2005-02-04 14:51:20 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Ed Fanta
2005-02-04 15:00:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Polaraligned
2005-02-04 16:50:40 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-02-04 19:05:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Jon Elson
2005-02-04 19:27:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Jon Elson
2005-02-04 19:43:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Jon Elson
2005-02-04 19:46:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport servo motors
braidmeister
2005-02-04 21:38:38 UTC
Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Denis Casserly
2005-02-05 13:58:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Jon Elson
2005-02-05 16:09:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport servo motors
Brian
2005-02-06 18:26:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport servo motors