Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Posted by
ballendo
on 2006-08-04 15:07:45 UTC
Phil, Snips, inserts follow...
over the long term.
http://www.promelec.ru/pdf/ir2101.pdf#search='IR2101%20mosfet%
20driver'
FET's are pretty common. Look for an "L" in the part number--IRFL vs.
IRF.
Problem is they're not as good for our use, with higher RDSon and
slower switching (more heat). But there are more than a few designs
which use them "successfully". Like all electronic design, you have
to assess the tradeoffs and choose your choices<G>
as surplus...
Ballendo
P.S. I want to add something to what Wayne said; because some folks
might find it confusing: He said the L298 is a "bi-polar device"
which is why it runs hotter... Well, it IS a bipolar device, in that
it changes the direction of current in the motor coil(compared to
unipolar which does not); BUT...
Perhaps a better way to say this is that the L298 uses bipolar
JUNCTION transistors in its outputs, and it is the use of these BJT's-
-instead of cooler running MOSFETS--which causes/creates the higher
temps.
298's do run hot; but as long as they're properly sized for the app,
and if needed, heatsinked; they are a good driver chip.
>In CCED, "Phil Mattison" <mattison20@...> wrote:And well proven. Used within its limits it is robust and reliable
>You make some good points. I was looking at the L298 mainly because
>it's cheap and abundant.
over the long term.
>I've seriously considered going to discreet MOSFETs but the gateHere is the datasheet to a commonly used solution:
>drive requirements for the high-voltage MOSFETs looks like a real
>pain in the keester.
http://www.promelec.ru/pdf/ir2101.pdf#search='IR2101%20mosfet%
20driver'
>Sure would be nice if you could get discreet high-voltage MOSFETsI don't know about a "built in gate driver" per se, but "logic level"
>with built-in gate drivers to accept logic-level control signals.
>Haven't been able to find anything like that. Anyone seen such an
>animal?
FET's are pretty common. Look for an "L" in the part number--IRFL vs.
IRF.
Problem is they're not as good for our use, with higher RDSon and
slower switching (more heat). But there are more than a few designs
which use them "successfully". Like all electronic design, you have
to assess the tradeoffs and choose your choices<G>
>a 1024-step shaft encoder seems like major overkill to me. MostYes. But the 1024 they might want to use is BECAUSE they got it cheap
>hobbyists seem to be looking for bargains, and overkill is counter-
>productive in that quest.
as surplus...
Ballendo
P.S. I want to add something to what Wayne said; because some folks
might find it confusing: He said the L298 is a "bi-polar device"
which is why it runs hotter... Well, it IS a bipolar device, in that
it changes the direction of current in the motor coil(compared to
unipolar which does not); BUT...
Perhaps a better way to say this is that the L298 uses bipolar
JUNCTION transistors in its outputs, and it is the use of these BJT's-
-instead of cooler running MOSFETS--which causes/creates the higher
temps.
298's do run hot; but as long as they're properly sized for the app,
and if needed, heatsinked; they are a good driver chip.
Discussion Thread
TheDragonPit
1999-09-22 05:29:43 UTC
L297/L298
Phil Mattison
2006-08-04 08:53:05 UTC
L297/L298
vrsculptor
2006-08-04 09:18:58 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Jon Elson
2006-08-04 09:42:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298
Lester Caine
2006-08-04 09:46:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-04 10:34:25 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Phil Mattison
2006-08-04 11:17:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
Lester Caine
2006-08-04 12:51:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
John Dammeyer
2006-08-04 13:22:58 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
Sebastien Bailard - Dubsen
2006-08-04 14:18:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
JanRwl@A...
2006-08-04 14:55:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
ballendo
2006-08-04 15:07:45 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Alan Marconett
2006-08-04 15:18:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298
John Dammeyer
2006-08-04 15:29:14 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
Phil Mattison
2006-08-04 16:49:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Doug Fortune
2006-08-04 17:27:23 UTC
Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Lee Studley
2006-08-04 20:17:14 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
afogassa
2006-08-04 20:33:32 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
caudlet
2006-08-04 21:11:38 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
P. J. Hicks
2006-08-04 21:41:10 UTC
Cameras
JanRwl@A...
2006-08-04 21:57:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
JanRwl@A...
2006-08-04 22:11:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Peter Reilley
2006-08-05 06:16:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cameras
caudlet
2006-08-05 07:06:17 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Doug Fortune
2006-08-05 08:38:59 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Alan Marconett
2006-08-05 09:20:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
turbulatordude
2006-08-05 09:35:13 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
ballendo
2006-08-05 11:26:45 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
ballendo
2006-08-05 11:29:13 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
ballendo
2006-08-05 11:31:37 UTC
OT Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-07 20:50:07 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Phil Mattison
2006-08-08 07:31:40 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Lester Caine
2006-08-08 11:58:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-08 21:13:53 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-08 21:34:55 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
ballendo
2006-08-08 22:01:43 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Jon Elson
2006-08-08 22:53:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-09 10:01:20 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
John Dammeyer
2006-08-09 10:17:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Alan Marconett
2006-08-09 10:47:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-11 22:18:42 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Lester Caine
2006-08-11 23:01:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-13 11:00:29 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Lester Caine
2006-08-13 13:03:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Steve Blackmore
2006-08-13 16:53:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Lester Caine
2006-08-13 23:05:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Vlad Krupin
2006-09-01 22:47:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298
turbulatordude
2006-09-02 08:53:04 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Vlad Krupin
2006-09-02 22:16:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298