RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Posted by
John Dammeyer
on 2006-08-09 10:17:28 UTC
The LM298 style of driver requires a sensing resistor for each leg.
Normally 0.01 to 0.05 ohms it should also be a low inductance resistor. One
quarter watt 0.01 ohm will do but with a 3.5 amp current that's only 35mV.
Your reference voltage used by the comparator will have to be very stable
and the circuit layout clean and noise free running close to wide traces
with 3.5A running through them.
As Mariss stated about his high side drivers, an optimum circuit isn't
always cost effective. I've done both L298 circuits and LM18245 and the
LM18245 is way easier to use. Unless I was building thousands I'd take the
easier route.
John Dammeyer
Wireless CAN with the CANRF module now available.
http://www.autoartisans.com/products
Automation Artisans Inc.
Ph. 1 250 544 4950
Normally 0.01 to 0.05 ohms it should also be a low inductance resistor. One
quarter watt 0.01 ohm will do but with a 3.5 amp current that's only 35mV.
Your reference voltage used by the comparator will have to be very stable
and the circuit layout clean and noise free running close to wide traces
with 3.5A running through them.
As Mariss stated about his high side drivers, an optimum circuit isn't
always cost effective. I've done both L298 circuits and LM18245 and the
LM18245 is way easier to use. Unless I was building thousands I'd take the
easier route.
John Dammeyer
Wireless CAN with the CANRF module now available.
http://www.autoartisans.com/products
Automation Artisans Inc.
Ph. 1 250 544 4950
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Wayne
> C. Gramlich
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 10:01 AM
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
>
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "ballendo"
> <ballendo@...> wrote:
> >
> > >In CCED, "Wayne C. Gramlich" <Wayne@> wrote:
> > >This was written about 2 years ago, so it is possible that
> some new
> > ><$10/axis integrated MOSFET solution has been deployed. I
> certainly
> > >am not aware of any, but I haven't beeen looking recently.
> >
> > Wayne,
> >
> > The Sanken Chips sold by Allegro are under your price point, and
> > perform very nicely. The "problem" is that Sanken has been of
> > a "unipolar" mindset for many years.
> >
> > I only wish Sanken and STS could run into each other (Reeses like)
> > saying,"Hey! you got microstepping in MY bipolar?!?
> >
> > "Yeah?, Well you got bipolar in MY microstepping"
> >
> > The STS L6208 with Sanken's uStep translator would be a nice chip
> > IMO. (or an SLA7078 with bipolar outputs; even better!)
> >
> > Until then, the choice seems to be two LMD18245's or the
> Sanken chips
> > for 3amp drives...
>
> Ballendo:
>
> The LM18245's are pretty expensive. By breaking out
> the DAC's and comparators, it is possible to use
> a L298 instead of an LM18245. The L298 can be configured
> to tie both internal H-bridges together to form a single
> H-bridge rated at 3.5 Amps I saw one person out there that
> built such a critter (I can't remember the URL tho'). It
> would only be rated for 48V instead of 55V tho'.
>
> -Wayne
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,
> wanliker@..., timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@...
> davemucha@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com
> to reach it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider
> this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the
> same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed
> on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
> POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO
> EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Discussion Thread
TheDragonPit
1999-09-22 05:29:43 UTC
L297/L298
Phil Mattison
2006-08-04 08:53:05 UTC
L297/L298
vrsculptor
2006-08-04 09:18:58 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Jon Elson
2006-08-04 09:42:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298
Lester Caine
2006-08-04 09:46:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-04 10:34:25 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Phil Mattison
2006-08-04 11:17:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
Lester Caine
2006-08-04 12:51:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
John Dammeyer
2006-08-04 13:22:58 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
Sebastien Bailard - Dubsen
2006-08-04 14:18:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
JanRwl@A...
2006-08-04 14:55:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
ballendo
2006-08-04 15:07:45 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Alan Marconett
2006-08-04 15:18:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298
John Dammeyer
2006-08-04 15:29:14 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
Phil Mattison
2006-08-04 16:49:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Doug Fortune
2006-08-04 17:27:23 UTC
Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Lee Studley
2006-08-04 20:17:14 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
afogassa
2006-08-04 20:33:32 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
caudlet
2006-08-04 21:11:38 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
P. J. Hicks
2006-08-04 21:41:10 UTC
Cameras
JanRwl@A...
2006-08-04 21:57:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
JanRwl@A...
2006-08-04 22:11:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Peter Reilley
2006-08-05 06:16:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cameras
caudlet
2006-08-05 07:06:17 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Doug Fortune
2006-08-05 08:38:59 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Alan Marconett
2006-08-05 09:20:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
turbulatordude
2006-08-05 09:35:13 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
ballendo
2006-08-05 11:26:45 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
ballendo
2006-08-05 11:29:13 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
ballendo
2006-08-05 11:31:37 UTC
OT Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-07 20:50:07 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Phil Mattison
2006-08-08 07:31:40 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Lester Caine
2006-08-08 11:58:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-08 21:13:53 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-08 21:34:55 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
ballendo
2006-08-08 22:01:43 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Jon Elson
2006-08-08 22:53:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-09 10:01:20 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
John Dammeyer
2006-08-09 10:17:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Alan Marconett
2006-08-09 10:47:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-11 22:18:42 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Lester Caine
2006-08-11 23:01:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-13 11:00:29 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Lester Caine
2006-08-13 13:03:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Steve Blackmore
2006-08-13 16:53:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Lester Caine
2006-08-13 23:05:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Vlad Krupin
2006-09-01 22:47:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298
turbulatordude
2006-09-02 08:53:04 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Vlad Krupin
2006-09-02 22:16:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298