CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"

Posted by John Dammeyer
on 2006-08-09 10:17:28 UTC
The LM298 style of driver requires a sensing resistor for each leg.
Normally 0.01 to 0.05 ohms it should also be a low inductance resistor. One
quarter watt 0.01 ohm will do but with a 3.5 amp current that's only 35mV.
Your reference voltage used by the comparator will have to be very stable
and the circuit layout clean and noise free running close to wide traces
with 3.5A running through them.

As Mariss stated about his high side drivers, an optimum circuit isn't
always cost effective. I've done both L298 circuits and LM18245 and the
LM18245 is way easier to use. Unless I was building thousands I'd take the
easier route.

John Dammeyer



Wireless CAN with the CANRF module now available.
http://www.autoartisans.com/products
Automation Artisans Inc.
Ph. 1 250 544 4950


> -----Original Message-----
> From: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Wayne
> C. Gramlich
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 10:01 AM
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
>
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "ballendo"
> <ballendo@...> wrote:
> >
> > >In CCED, "Wayne C. Gramlich" <Wayne@> wrote:
> > >This was written about 2 years ago, so it is possible that
> some new
> > ><$10/axis integrated MOSFET solution has been deployed. I
> certainly
> > >am not aware of any, but I haven't beeen looking recently.
> >
> > Wayne,
> >
> > The Sanken Chips sold by Allegro are under your price point, and
> > perform very nicely. The "problem" is that Sanken has been of
> > a "unipolar" mindset for many years.
> >
> > I only wish Sanken and STS could run into each other (Reeses like)
> > saying,"Hey! you got microstepping in MY bipolar?!?
> >
> > "Yeah?, Well you got bipolar in MY microstepping"
> >
> > The STS L6208 with Sanken's uStep translator would be a nice chip
> > IMO. (or an SLA7078 with bipolar outputs; even better!)
> >
> > Until then, the choice seems to be two LMD18245's or the
> Sanken chips
> > for 3amp drives...
>
> Ballendo:
>
> The LM18245's are pretty expensive. By breaking out
> the DAC's and comparators, it is possible to use
> a L298 instead of an LM18245. The L298 can be configured
> to tie both internal H-bridges together to form a single
> H-bridge rated at 3.5 Amps I saw one person out there that
> built such a critter (I can't remember the URL tho'). It
> would only be rated for 48V instead of 55V tho'.
>
> -Wayne
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,
> wanliker@..., timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@...
> davemucha@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com
> to reach it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider
> this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the
> same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed
> on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
> POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO
> EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Discussion Thread

TheDragonPit 1999-09-22 05:29:43 UTC L297/L298 Phil Mattison 2006-08-04 08:53:05 UTC L297/L298 vrsculptor 2006-08-04 09:18:58 UTC Re: L297/L298 Jon Elson 2006-08-04 09:42:09 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 Lester Caine 2006-08-04 09:46:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 Wayne C. Gramlich 2006-08-04 10:34:25 UTC Re: L297/L298 Phil Mattison 2006-08-04 11:17:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 Lester Caine 2006-08-04 12:51:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 John Dammeyer 2006-08-04 13:22:58 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 Sebastien Bailard - Dubsen 2006-08-04 14:18:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 JanRwl@A... 2006-08-04 14:55:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 ballendo 2006-08-04 15:07:45 UTC Re: L297/L298 And a "correction" Alan Marconett 2006-08-04 15:18:52 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 John Dammeyer 2006-08-04 15:29:14 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 Phil Mattison 2006-08-04 16:49:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction" Doug Fortune 2006-08-04 17:27:23 UTC Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph Lee Studley 2006-08-04 20:17:14 UTC Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph afogassa 2006-08-04 20:33:32 UTC Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph caudlet 2006-08-04 21:11:38 UTC Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph P. J. Hicks 2006-08-04 21:41:10 UTC Cameras JanRwl@A... 2006-08-04 21:57:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph JanRwl@A... 2006-08-04 22:11:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph Peter Reilley 2006-08-05 06:16:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cameras caudlet 2006-08-05 07:06:17 UTC Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph Doug Fortune 2006-08-05 08:38:59 UTC Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph Alan Marconett 2006-08-05 09:20:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph turbulatordude 2006-08-05 09:35:13 UTC Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph ballendo 2006-08-05 11:26:45 UTC Re: L297/L298 And a "correction" ballendo 2006-08-05 11:29:13 UTC Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph ballendo 2006-08-05 11:31:37 UTC OT Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph Wayne C. Gramlich 2006-08-07 20:50:07 UTC Re: L297/L298 Phil Mattison 2006-08-08 07:31:40 UTC Re: L297/L298 Lester Caine 2006-08-08 11:58:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 Wayne C. Gramlich 2006-08-08 21:13:53 UTC Re: L297/L298 And a "correction" Mariss Freimanis 2006-08-08 21:34:55 UTC Re: L297/L298 And a "correction" ballendo 2006-08-08 22:01:43 UTC Re: L297/L298 And a "correction" Jon Elson 2006-08-08 22:53:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction" Wayne C. Gramlich 2006-08-09 10:01:20 UTC Re: L297/L298 And a "correction" John Dammeyer 2006-08-09 10:17:28 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction" Alan Marconett 2006-08-09 10:47:18 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction" Wayne C. Gramlich 2006-08-11 22:18:42 UTC Re: L297/L298 And a "correction" Lester Caine 2006-08-11 23:01:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction" Wayne C. Gramlich 2006-08-13 11:00:29 UTC Re: L297/L298 And a "correction" Lester Caine 2006-08-13 13:03:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction" Steve Blackmore 2006-08-13 16:53:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction" Lester Caine 2006-08-13 23:05:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction" Vlad Krupin 2006-09-01 22:47:16 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298 turbulatordude 2006-09-02 08:53:04 UTC Re: L297/L298 Vlad Krupin 2006-09-02 22:16:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298