Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Posted by
Wayne C. Gramlich
on 2006-08-09 10:01:20 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "ballendo" <ballendo@...> wrote:
The LM18245's are pretty expensive. By breaking out
the DAC's and comparators, it is possible to use
a L298 instead of an LM18245. The L298 can be configured
to tie both internal H-bridges together to form a single
H-bridge rated at 3.5 Amps I saw one person out there that
built such a critter (I can't remember the URL tho'). It
would only be rated for 48V instead of 55V tho'.
-Wayne
>Ballendo:
> >In CCED, "Wayne C. Gramlich" <Wayne@> wrote:
> >This was written about 2 years ago, so it is possible that some new
> ><$10/axis integrated MOSFET solution has been deployed. I certainly
> >am not aware of any, but I haven't beeen looking recently.
>
> Wayne,
>
> The Sanken Chips sold by Allegro are under your price point, and
> perform very nicely. The "problem" is that Sanken has been of
> a "unipolar" mindset for many years.
>
> I only wish Sanken and STS could run into each other (Reeses like)
> saying,"Hey! you got microstepping in MY bipolar?!?
>
> "Yeah?, Well you got bipolar in MY microstepping"
>
> The STS L6208 with Sanken's uStep translator would be a nice chip
> IMO. (or an SLA7078 with bipolar outputs; even better!)
>
> Until then, the choice seems to be two LMD18245's or the Sanken chips
> for 3amp drives...
The LM18245's are pretty expensive. By breaking out
the DAC's and comparators, it is possible to use
a L298 instead of an LM18245. The L298 can be configured
to tie both internal H-bridges together to form a single
H-bridge rated at 3.5 Amps I saw one person out there that
built such a critter (I can't remember the URL tho'). It
would only be rated for 48V instead of 55V tho'.
-Wayne
Discussion Thread
TheDragonPit
1999-09-22 05:29:43 UTC
L297/L298
Phil Mattison
2006-08-04 08:53:05 UTC
L297/L298
vrsculptor
2006-08-04 09:18:58 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Jon Elson
2006-08-04 09:42:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298
Lester Caine
2006-08-04 09:46:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-04 10:34:25 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Phil Mattison
2006-08-04 11:17:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
Lester Caine
2006-08-04 12:51:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
John Dammeyer
2006-08-04 13:22:58 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
Sebastien Bailard - Dubsen
2006-08-04 14:18:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
JanRwl@A...
2006-08-04 14:55:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
ballendo
2006-08-04 15:07:45 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Alan Marconett
2006-08-04 15:18:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298
John Dammeyer
2006-08-04 15:29:14 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
Phil Mattison
2006-08-04 16:49:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Doug Fortune
2006-08-04 17:27:23 UTC
Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Lee Studley
2006-08-04 20:17:14 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
afogassa
2006-08-04 20:33:32 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
caudlet
2006-08-04 21:11:38 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
P. J. Hicks
2006-08-04 21:41:10 UTC
Cameras
JanRwl@A...
2006-08-04 21:57:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
JanRwl@A...
2006-08-04 22:11:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Peter Reilley
2006-08-05 06:16:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cameras
caudlet
2006-08-05 07:06:17 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Doug Fortune
2006-08-05 08:38:59 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Alan Marconett
2006-08-05 09:20:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
turbulatordude
2006-08-05 09:35:13 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
ballendo
2006-08-05 11:26:45 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
ballendo
2006-08-05 11:29:13 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
ballendo
2006-08-05 11:31:37 UTC
OT Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-07 20:50:07 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Phil Mattison
2006-08-08 07:31:40 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Lester Caine
2006-08-08 11:58:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-08 21:13:53 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-08 21:34:55 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
ballendo
2006-08-08 22:01:43 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Jon Elson
2006-08-08 22:53:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-09 10:01:20 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
John Dammeyer
2006-08-09 10:17:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Alan Marconett
2006-08-09 10:47:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-11 22:18:42 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Lester Caine
2006-08-11 23:01:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-13 11:00:29 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Lester Caine
2006-08-13 13:03:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Steve Blackmore
2006-08-13 16:53:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Lester Caine
2006-08-13 23:05:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Vlad Krupin
2006-09-01 22:47:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298
turbulatordude
2006-09-02 08:53:04 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Vlad Krupin
2006-09-02 22:16:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298