Re: L297/L298
Posted by
Wayne C. Gramlich
on 2006-08-07 20:50:07 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, JanRwl@... wrote:
All:
Yikes! Both John and Ballendo are correct. I was
using the "techie" terminology for silicon transistors.
The first transistors that were invented are called
PNP and NPN silcon transistors (actually they used
Germanium first; but I digress.) Silicon transistors
drop .2 volts when they are saturated and consequently
radiate .2V * (current) watts of heat. For the L298,
if you have 4 coils turned full on, that 4 (coils) *
(2 amps) * .2 volts = 16 watts. This is quite hot and
needs a heat sink.
FET (field effect transistors) are newer and have
a lower voltage drop when the are "on". Thus, they
radiate much less heat. I'm not as comfortable talking
about FET's, since most of my experience is with the
older silicon NPN/PNP transistor techonology. I'll
let other more experienced people on the list chime
in about FET transistors.
-Wayne
P.S. I'm out on vacation, and my internet access is
kind of spotty; hence, the delay in my responses.
>heat in
> In a message dated 8/4/2006 3:26:02 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> johnd@... writes:
>
> The L298 is a bi-polar device and consequently generates more
> operation than its FET counterparts<<techie
> I think someone should clarify "bipolar" as used here for the non-
> types:diodes and NPN
>
> There are basically TWO realms of semiconductors, those like
> and PNP transistors are called "bipolar;" and the otherkind, "FET's"
> (Field-Effect Transistors).drivers!" "UNIpolar"
>
> This should NOT be confused with "bipolar steppers and
> stepper-drivers have four transistors that alternately connecttwo
> motor-wires to negative, the positive "always" supplied viacenter-taps in the two
> windings in "UNIpolar" motors.two wires
>
> "BIpolar" motors have two windings with NO center-taps, and the
> per winding (four such wires in all) are "fed" positive andnegative by the
> driver, and this polarity is simply SWAPPED to negative andpositive,
> respectively, first in ONE winding for ONE step and then in theother winding for the
> NEXT step, and so on.transistors!
>
> A "Bipolar driver" can be made with EITHER "bipolar" or "FET"
> Sorry if I've confused you all by my poor explanation!JRR
All:
Yikes! Both John and Ballendo are correct. I was
using the "techie" terminology for silicon transistors.
The first transistors that were invented are called
PNP and NPN silcon transistors (actually they used
Germanium first; but I digress.) Silicon transistors
drop .2 volts when they are saturated and consequently
radiate .2V * (current) watts of heat. For the L298,
if you have 4 coils turned full on, that 4 (coils) *
(2 amps) * .2 volts = 16 watts. This is quite hot and
needs a heat sink.
FET (field effect transistors) are newer and have
a lower voltage drop when the are "on". Thus, they
radiate much less heat. I'm not as comfortable talking
about FET's, since most of my experience is with the
older silicon NPN/PNP transistor techonology. I'll
let other more experienced people on the list chime
in about FET transistors.
-Wayne
P.S. I'm out on vacation, and my internet access is
kind of spotty; hence, the delay in my responses.
Discussion Thread
TheDragonPit
1999-09-22 05:29:43 UTC
L297/L298
Phil Mattison
2006-08-04 08:53:05 UTC
L297/L298
vrsculptor
2006-08-04 09:18:58 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Jon Elson
2006-08-04 09:42:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298
Lester Caine
2006-08-04 09:46:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-04 10:34:25 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Phil Mattison
2006-08-04 11:17:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
Lester Caine
2006-08-04 12:51:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
John Dammeyer
2006-08-04 13:22:58 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
Sebastien Bailard - Dubsen
2006-08-04 14:18:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
JanRwl@A...
2006-08-04 14:55:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
ballendo
2006-08-04 15:07:45 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Alan Marconett
2006-08-04 15:18:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298
John Dammeyer
2006-08-04 15:29:14 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
Phil Mattison
2006-08-04 16:49:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Doug Fortune
2006-08-04 17:27:23 UTC
Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Lee Studley
2006-08-04 20:17:14 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
afogassa
2006-08-04 20:33:32 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
caudlet
2006-08-04 21:11:38 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
P. J. Hicks
2006-08-04 21:41:10 UTC
Cameras
JanRwl@A...
2006-08-04 21:57:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
JanRwl@A...
2006-08-04 22:11:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Peter Reilley
2006-08-05 06:16:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cameras
caudlet
2006-08-05 07:06:17 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Doug Fortune
2006-08-05 08:38:59 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Alan Marconett
2006-08-05 09:20:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
turbulatordude
2006-08-05 09:35:13 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
ballendo
2006-08-05 11:26:45 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
ballendo
2006-08-05 11:29:13 UTC
Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
ballendo
2006-08-05 11:31:37 UTC
OT Re: Looking for mini-VFD for 120VAC/1ph
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-07 20:50:07 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Phil Mattison
2006-08-08 07:31:40 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Lester Caine
2006-08-08 11:58:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-08 21:13:53 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-08 21:34:55 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
ballendo
2006-08-08 22:01:43 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Jon Elson
2006-08-08 22:53:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-09 10:01:20 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
John Dammeyer
2006-08-09 10:17:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Alan Marconett
2006-08-09 10:47:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-11 22:18:42 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Lester Caine
2006-08-11 23:01:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-13 11:00:29 UTC
Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Lester Caine
2006-08-13 13:03:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Steve Blackmore
2006-08-13 16:53:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Lester Caine
2006-08-13 23:05:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298 And a "correction"
Vlad Krupin
2006-09-01 22:47:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] L297/L298
turbulatordude
2006-09-02 08:53:04 UTC
Re: L297/L298
Vlad Krupin
2006-09-02 22:16:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: L297/L298