Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Posted by
Steve Stallings
on 2006-08-13 18:44:08 UTC
It is normal for drivers running a stepper motor
above the corner frequency to never reach the
specified coil current before the next step comes
along. The result is that a micro-stepping drive
will seem to act more like a full step drive at
higher speeds. This is normal and is above the
dreaded resonance ranges. When the step rate
drops to somewhere that resonance and micro-steps
matter, the relationship between the PWM or chop
rate and the step frequency once again allows
real micro-stepping currents to be established.
Regards,
Steve Stallings
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Phil Mattison"
<mattison20@...> wrote:
above the corner frequency to never reach the
specified coil current before the next step comes
along. The result is that a micro-stepping drive
will seem to act more like a full step drive at
higher speeds. This is normal and is above the
dreaded resonance ranges. When the step rate
drops to somewhere that resonance and micro-steps
matter, the relationship between the PWM or chop
rate and the step frequency once again allows
real micro-stepping currents to be established.
Regards,
Steve Stallings
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Phil Mattison"
<mattison20@...> wrote:
>implies that
> Perhaps, but a 100KHz microstep rate and a 20KHz PWM frequency
> the coil current is modified five times in a single cycle of thePWM, which
> is absurd. In that case, the PWM (or chopper, whatever) cannotproduce the
> power modulation that is supposed to be the big deal withmicrostepping. Any
> microstep rate above the PWM frequency renders it meaningless. Whatyou end
> up with in practice is a single-step driver.PWM
> --
> Phil Mattison
> http://www.ohmikron.com/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@...>
> To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 12:48 PM
> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
>
>
> > I have thought a little about the relationships you mentioned over
> > the years.:-) I'll just cover the step frequency vs. PWM frequency
> > thing:
> >
> > I think you misunderstand PWM works. Microstepping frequency and
> > frequency are completely unrelated. This thought experiment mayhelp
> > to straighten it out:results
> >
> > I think you agree that 400 Hz step rate on a full-step drive
> > in a 100Hz current waveform frequency. The full-step sequencerepeats
> > after 4 full steps after all. This modulates OK on a 20kHz PWMfor a
> > motor speed of 120RPM.and
> >
> > A 250-microstep drive needs a 100kHz step pulse frequency to get a
> > speed of 120RPM. The current waveform frequency is still the same
> > it still modulates OK.It
> >
> > 100kHz is way above the PWM frequency but the PWM never sees it.
> > only sees the resulting 100Hz reference, the same as for the full-as if
> > step drive. This also modulates OK on a 20kHz PWM.
> >
> > Mariss
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Phil Mattison"
> > <mattison20@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I've seen a lot of comments about microstepping on this board
> > it ismotor
> > > the best thing since sliced bread. I wonder how many people have
> > thought
> > > about the relationships between step rate, PWM frequency and
> > > inductance. Since microstepping supposedly uses the PWM chopperto
> > regulatePWM
> > > current into something like a sine wave to improve motor
> > performance, it
> > > stands to reason that if the step rate gets anywhere near the
> > frequencyall.
> > > that theory goes out the window. Also, the motor coil inductance
> > puts an
> > > upper bound on the step rate at which the PWM does anything at
> > Exactlyother
> > > what those limits are depends on the combination of motor
> > inductance, power
> > > supply voltage, chopper switching speeds and probably several
> > factorsthan
> > > with less impact. So to say that more microstepping is better
> > less isreach it if
> > > like saying that blue is better than orange.
> > > --
> > > Phil Mattison
> > > http://www.ohmikron.com/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> > Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
> timg@...
> > Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@...
> [Moderators]
> > URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> >
> > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
> you have trouble.to be a
> > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this
> sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members arethere, for OT
> subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.POSTING THEM.
> >
> > NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
> DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> > bill
> > List Mom
> > List Owner
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Discussion Thread
Phil Mattison
2006-08-13 11:35:32 UTC
Microstepping thru the Tulips
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-13 12:50:54 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
turbulatordude
2006-08-13 13:57:07 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-13 15:18:28 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Wayne C. Gramlich
2006-08-13 18:08:18 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Phil Mattison
2006-08-13 18:21:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Steve Stallings
2006-08-13 18:44:08 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-13 19:18:36 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Jon Elson
2006-08-13 22:17:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
John Dammeyer
2006-08-13 23:54:31 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
lcdpublishing
2006-08-14 04:44:35 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Graham Stabler
2006-08-14 05:04:52 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Phil Mattison
2006-08-14 08:36:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Steve Stallings
2006-08-14 09:18:00 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
turbulatordude
2006-08-14 09:33:08 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-14 17:39:57 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Dennis Schmitz
2006-08-14 19:41:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
turbulatordude
2006-08-14 19:48:01 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-14 20:21:07 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Henrik Olsson
2006-08-15 02:58:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
turbulatordude
2006-08-15 07:23:23 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Phil Mattison
2006-08-15 08:27:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
lcdpublishing
2006-08-15 08:55:36 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Les Newell
2006-08-15 09:26:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Les Newell
2006-08-15 09:32:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-15 10:16:27 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Graham Stabler
2006-08-15 12:13:26 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-15 13:37:34 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Graham Stabler
2006-08-15 16:03:35 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Paul Kelly
2006-08-15 17:43:39 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-15 20:00:13 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Graham Stabler
2006-08-16 02:18:22 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Les Newell
2006-08-16 02:26:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
turbulatordude
2006-08-16 08:53:07 UTC
Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips
Les Newell
2006-08-16 09:22:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Microstepping thru the Tulips