Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: supertech
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2007-08-21 18:01:20 UTC
Lester Caine wrote:
mm/min). That was a direct-drive connection to the stock
leadscrews.
I had some old-style NEMA size 34 stepper motors on the 150-Lb
minimill, direct-drive to the stock leadscrews and got 90 IPM (
2250 mm/min) using Gecko 201A drives and a 50 V power supply.
This was with my Universal Stepper Controller as the source of
the step pulses, and EMC1 as the CNC program.
Jon
> Paul Kelly wrote:I put some small servo motors on a Taig and got 120 IPM (3000
>
>>OK, so how does the new guy spot a lemon?
>>
>>My sugguestion is to look at the DC supply voltage. If its much less than
>>24V then you're probably not looking at a good chopper drive.
>>Isolation is another good indicator of a quality product. Although you can
>>stuff it up with cheap(slow) opto-couplers.
>>
>>I do think the term "performance" is used non specifically. Defining the
>>problem is really the crux of the issue.
>
>
> I think it would be nice to start recording what performance people are seeing
> from the various drivers. I am getting reports of 400 to 450mm/min on the Taig
> table using Xylotex drivers at 28V-bipolar while I am getting a good 600mm/min
> with the Taig/MicroProto controller running 60V-unipolar. The Taig/MicroProto
> closed loop controller will give 1500mm/min with the same stepper motor
> driver. I have yet to get the Chinese drivers hooked up to test them, but I
> have had the L297/298 pair running at 24V and giving 300mm/min driving one
> pair of the unipolar wired taig motors.
mm/min). That was a direct-drive connection to the stock
leadscrews.
I had some old-style NEMA size 34 stepper motors on the 150-Lb
minimill, direct-drive to the stock leadscrews and got 90 IPM (
2250 mm/min) using Gecko 201A drives and a 50 V power supply.
This was with my Universal Stepper Controller as the source of
the step pulses, and EMC1 as the CNC program.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Lurch
2007-08-20 07:48:38 UTC
supertech
R Rogers
2007-08-20 12:57:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] supertech
Lurch
2007-08-20 18:15:36 UTC
Re: supertech
Harko Schwartz
2007-08-21 03:29:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: supertech
Paul Kelly
2007-08-21 04:49:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: supertech
Lester Caine
2007-08-21 10:17:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: supertech
Paul Kelly
2007-08-21 16:19:46 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: supertech
Jon Elson
2007-08-21 18:01:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: supertech
vrsculptor
2007-08-21 21:12:43 UTC
Re: supertech
Lurch
2007-08-21 21:14:58 UTC
Solved [was Re: supertech]
Paul Kelly
2007-08-21 21:48:47 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Solved [was Re: supertech]
Jon Elson
2007-08-21 22:58:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: supertech
caudlet
2007-08-22 09:35:46 UTC
Solved [was Re: supertech]
Jim DuBois
2007-08-22 22:04:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Solved [was Re: supertech]
Andy Wander
2007-08-23 12:27:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Solved [was Re: supertech]
art
2007-08-23 20:33:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Solved [was Re: supertech]
jwettroth
2007-08-24 17:05:27 UTC
Re: supertech