CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner}

Posted by John Hansford
on 2007-10-10 07:03:46 UTC
Steve,

The problem is, it isn't my group now. It belongs
to 55 other members who'll have to make what
they will of it.

I can warn them the group will be deleted in X days
and go to jobshophomeshop.

The first question will be "Why?"
The next question will be "Well, who are you to decide
that?"

How do I answer the first question?
Do I say the CCED doesn't like that a member went
off on his own and started a Yahoo group?
That's the truthful answer.

Or do I make up something like "It's better for you".
Then the second question comes.

There's no support from here. I'd just ignore it.

John



--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "scyvt" <scy@...> wrote:
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "John Hansford" <kz1927@> wrote:
> >
> > I WAS unaware of it.... >
> > True...all I had to do was look, But didn't...
> > The MMG is not only for Off-topic, but Far Off Topic...
> >
> > John
>
>
> John
>
> Nothing I said was meant to suggest that there wouldn't be
considerable benefit to the list
> you propose. Indeed, this is an area of intense interest for myself;
nonetheless, I also paid
> no attention to the "sister list" But dilution and sub-division of
the topic is probably not
> what you wanted. Given the now-recognized existence of
jobshophomeshop, perhaps the
> most significant issue is whether two lists are better than one -
and if not, how to resolve
> the overlap.
>
> Steve Clay-Young
>

Discussion Thread

John Hansford 2007-10-04 15:56:17 UTC New group idea gawnca 2007-10-05 07:36:40 UTC Re: New group idea smitty 2007-10-05 10:02:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New group idea caudlet 2007-10-05 10:26:11 UTC Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner} John Hansford 2007-10-05 13:59:19 UTC Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner} John Stevenson 2007-10-05 15:31:51 UTC Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner} Yahoo 2007-10-05 15:55:45 UTC Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner} turbulatordude 2007-10-05 16:35:21 UTC Re: New group idea Peter Homann 2007-10-05 17:18:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner} scyvt 2007-10-07 06:49:36 UTC Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner} John Hansford 2007-10-07 07:06:30 UTC Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner} Jon Elson 2007-10-07 12:24:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner} Wayne C. Gramlich 2007-10-07 12:38:04 UTC Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner} Yahoo 2007-10-07 12:56:14 UTC Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner} Jon Elson 2007-10-07 15:48:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner} turbulatordude 2007-10-08 05:17:40 UTC Re: New group idea {possible change - WIKI Graham Stabler 2007-10-08 07:46:42 UTC Re: New group idea {possible change - WIKI scyvt 2007-10-10 05:16:14 UTC Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner} John Hansford 2007-10-10 07:03:46 UTC Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner} Yahoo 2007-10-10 08:11:57 UTC Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner}