Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner}
Posted by
John Hansford
on 2007-10-10 07:03:46 UTC
Steve,
The problem is, it isn't my group now. It belongs
to 55 other members who'll have to make what
they will of it.
I can warn them the group will be deleted in X days
and go to jobshophomeshop.
The first question will be "Why?"
The next question will be "Well, who are you to decide
that?"
How do I answer the first question?
Do I say the CCED doesn't like that a member went
off on his own and started a Yahoo group?
That's the truthful answer.
Or do I make up something like "It's better for you".
Then the second question comes.
There's no support from here. I'd just ignore it.
John
The problem is, it isn't my group now. It belongs
to 55 other members who'll have to make what
they will of it.
I can warn them the group will be deleted in X days
and go to jobshophomeshop.
The first question will be "Why?"
The next question will be "Well, who are you to decide
that?"
How do I answer the first question?
Do I say the CCED doesn't like that a member went
off on his own and started a Yahoo group?
That's the truthful answer.
Or do I make up something like "It's better for you".
Then the second question comes.
There's no support from here. I'd just ignore it.
John
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "scyvt" <scy@...> wrote:
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "John Hansford" <kz1927@> wrote:
> >
> > I WAS unaware of it.... >
> > True...all I had to do was look, But didn't...
> > The MMG is not only for Off-topic, but Far Off Topic...
> >
> > John
>
>
> John
>
> Nothing I said was meant to suggest that there wouldn't be
considerable benefit to the list
> you propose. Indeed, this is an area of intense interest for myself;
nonetheless, I also paid
> no attention to the "sister list" But dilution and sub-division of
the topic is probably not
> what you wanted. Given the now-recognized existence of
jobshophomeshop, perhaps the
> most significant issue is whether two lists are better than one -
and if not, how to resolve
> the overlap.
>
> Steve Clay-Young
>
Discussion Thread
John Hansford
2007-10-04 15:56:17 UTC
New group idea
gawnca
2007-10-05 07:36:40 UTC
Re: New group idea
smitty
2007-10-05 10:02:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New group idea
caudlet
2007-10-05 10:26:11 UTC
Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner}
John Hansford
2007-10-05 13:59:19 UTC
Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner}
John Stevenson
2007-10-05 15:31:51 UTC
Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner}
Yahoo
2007-10-05 15:55:45 UTC
Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner}
turbulatordude
2007-10-05 16:35:21 UTC
Re: New group idea
Peter Homann
2007-10-05 17:18:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner}
scyvt
2007-10-07 06:49:36 UTC
Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner}
John Hansford
2007-10-07 07:06:30 UTC
Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner}
Jon Elson
2007-10-07 12:24:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner}
Wayne C. Gramlich
2007-10-07 12:38:04 UTC
Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner}
Yahoo
2007-10-07 12:56:14 UTC
Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner}
Jon Elson
2007-10-07 15:48:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner}
turbulatordude
2007-10-08 05:17:40 UTC
Re: New group idea {possible change - WIKI
Graham Stabler
2007-10-08 07:46:42 UTC
Re: New group idea {possible change - WIKI
scyvt
2007-10-10 05:16:14 UTC
Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner}
John Hansford
2007-10-10 07:03:46 UTC
Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner}
Yahoo
2007-10-10 08:11:57 UTC
Re: New group idea {possible change in rules from list owner}