EDM
Posted by
Tim Goldstein
on 1999-06-19 23:19:54 UTC
Bill,
Along with all the other projects I have going, I am interested in EDM. Jon
Elson posted a little about a mini EDM he made and put info about it on his
web site. I just ordered the Home Shop Machinist book on building an EDM so
I am starting to get to the point that I to have interest in an sources and
hints for EDM supplies and info.
Tim
[Denver, CO]
Along with all the other projects I have going, I am interested in EDM. Jon
Elson posted a little about a mini EDM he made and put info about it on his
web site. I just ordered the Home Shop Machinist book on building an EDM so
I am starting to get to the point that I to have interest in an sources and
hints for EDM supplies and info.
Tim
[Denver, CO]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Martin [mailto:wwm@...]
> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 1999 9:43 PM
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@onelist.com
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] What would we read????
>
>
> From: Bill Martin <wwm@...>
>
> Well, I'm in the "lurker" camp for the most part, but find the Linux &
> EMC
> thread very informative. I did ask about sources for surplus priced EDM
> stuff one time, but never say any follow up, so I presume its not of
> general
> interest, at least not as much as "flying chip" machine topics. Or maybe
> there
> really just isn't much available?
>
> Bill Martin
>
> WAnliker@... wrote:
> >
> > From: WAnliker@...
> >
> > In a message dated 6/16/99 10:29:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> > mfraser@... writes:
> >
> > >
> > Right now if we split the list and everybody continued to lurk on other
> > subjects, what postings would we have to read?????? The
> EMC/Lunex thread is
> > within our subject headings, the vacuum forming is not, but I want to
> > encourage lurkers to speak up, and will endure some noise now
> to get more
> > people posting. As more threads on the list topics are going
> then we can
> > discourage the "noise".
> > It is my humble opinion that most are not too unhappy, they are still
> > subscribed, and I assume reading the postings, I will always
> encourage those
> > that want a different thread going to speak up, and get it
> started. Control
> > from this seat is going to be as minimal as possible.
> > bill
> > List Manager
> > (Whose EE dates to '68, when they STILL taught us vaccuum tubes....)
> > And my technician level, and 2nd class FCC goes back to
> 56....... grin(old
> > Fart)
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Where do some of the Internet's largest email lists reside?
> > http://www.onelist.com
> > At ONElist - the most scalable and reliable service on the Internet.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@..., an unmodulated list for
> the discussion of shop built systems in the above catagories.
> > To Unsubscribe:
> > http://www.onelist.com/unsubscribe/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> > bill, List Manager
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Got an opinion?
> http://www.onelist.com
> Make it count! Sign up for the ONElist Weekly Survey now.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@..., an unmodulated list for
> the discussion of shop built systems in the above catagories.
> To Unsubscribe:
> http://www.onelist.com/unsubscribe/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill, List Manager
>
Discussion Thread
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-19 23:19:54 UTC
EDM
George Potter
1999-06-20 06:41:08 UTC
Re: EDM
Pete Jarman
1999-06-20 10:41:25 UTC
Re: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-21 07:43:01 UTC
Re: EDM
psp@x...
1999-06-21 08:51:38 UTC
Re: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-16 15:37:43 UTC
Re: EDM
TADGUNINC@x...
1999-07-16 18:11:51 UTC
Re: EDM
Scott Acorn
1999-07-17 17:07:53 UTC
Re: EDM
Scott Acorn
1999-07-17 18:09:08 UTC
Re: EDM
Jon Anderson
1999-07-17 18:14:31 UTC
Re: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-18 15:26:09 UTC
RE: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-18 15:32:47 UTC
RE: EDM
Mo
1999-07-18 14:41:03 UTC
Re: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-18 17:22:08 UTC
RE: EDM
J Catmull
1999-07-28 08:06:45 UTC
Re: EDM
Brian Fairey
2000-02-16 16:36:26 UTC
EDM
Jon Elson
2000-02-16 22:03:02 UTC
Re: EDM
tommy40010
2002-12-03 05:58:56 UTC
EDM
Jon Elson
2002-12-03 10:33:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
Tommy Sullivan
2002-12-03 16:13:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
Jon Elson
2002-12-13 00:17:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
JanRwl@A...
2002-12-13 09:55:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2002-12-13 10:23:49 UTC
Re: EDM
wanliker@a...
2002-12-13 16:37:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
Steve
2002-12-13 22:24:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM
Hoyt McKagen
2002-12-14 04:47:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM
wanliker@a...
2002-12-14 08:46:54 UTC
EDM
wanliker@a...
2002-12-14 09:18:10 UTC
EDM
Jay Hayes
2002-12-14 10:27:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
JanRwl@A...
2002-12-14 18:36:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
RichD
2002-12-14 19:04:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
JanRwl@A...
2002-12-14 20:21:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
Ian W. Wright
2002-12-17 02:17:50 UTC
Re: EDM
Steve
2002-12-17 07:47:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM