RE: EDM
Posted by
Tim Goldstein
on 1999-07-18 17:22:08 UTC
Mo,
Yes, I set them up as 4 pair in series and then the sets in parallel.
Don't think this even gets me close to being an electronics expert. I just
had someone that knows what they are doing point me to a good reference
source!!
Tim
[Denver, CO]
Yes, I set them up as 4 pair in series and then the sets in parallel.
Don't think this even gets me close to being an electronics expert. I just
had someone that knows what they are doing point me to a good reference
source!!
Tim
[Denver, CO]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mo [mailto:mo@...]
> Sent: Sunday, July 18, 1999 3:41 PM
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@onelist.com
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
>
>
> From: "Mo" <mo@...>
>
> > Resistor network 8 - 13 ohm 50 watt wired up to yield 6.5 ohm
> 400 watt (if
> I
> > figured right)
> Tim, I am sure you wired them up as 4 pairs (each pair in series) and then
> put those 4 pairs in parallel.
> That was a neat move because assuming the electrode / workpiece
> contact as a
> dead short you draw 7.5A which is a good setting for your supply.
> That current splits out 4 ways into each pair of resistors so each pair
> passes about 1.8A so each resistor will pass 1.8A so will be driving 44W
> which is a good level for the 50W rating.......if that is what you
> calculated, that was slick and you now qualify as one of the resident
> electronics advisors on this list ...any chance of getting you to design a
> Servo-to-Go clone :)
> Mo
Discussion Thread
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-19 23:19:54 UTC
EDM
George Potter
1999-06-20 06:41:08 UTC
Re: EDM
Pete Jarman
1999-06-20 10:41:25 UTC
Re: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-21 07:43:01 UTC
Re: EDM
psp@x...
1999-06-21 08:51:38 UTC
Re: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-16 15:37:43 UTC
Re: EDM
TADGUNINC@x...
1999-07-16 18:11:51 UTC
Re: EDM
Scott Acorn
1999-07-17 17:07:53 UTC
Re: EDM
Scott Acorn
1999-07-17 18:09:08 UTC
Re: EDM
Jon Anderson
1999-07-17 18:14:31 UTC
Re: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-18 15:26:09 UTC
RE: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-18 15:32:47 UTC
RE: EDM
Mo
1999-07-18 14:41:03 UTC
Re: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-18 17:22:08 UTC
RE: EDM
J Catmull
1999-07-28 08:06:45 UTC
Re: EDM
Brian Fairey
2000-02-16 16:36:26 UTC
EDM
Jon Elson
2000-02-16 22:03:02 UTC
Re: EDM
tommy40010
2002-12-03 05:58:56 UTC
EDM
Jon Elson
2002-12-03 10:33:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
Tommy Sullivan
2002-12-03 16:13:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
Jon Elson
2002-12-13 00:17:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
JanRwl@A...
2002-12-13 09:55:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2002-12-13 10:23:49 UTC
Re: EDM
wanliker@a...
2002-12-13 16:37:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
Steve
2002-12-13 22:24:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM
Hoyt McKagen
2002-12-14 04:47:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM
wanliker@a...
2002-12-14 08:46:54 UTC
EDM
wanliker@a...
2002-12-14 09:18:10 UTC
EDM
Jay Hayes
2002-12-14 10:27:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
JanRwl@A...
2002-12-14 18:36:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
RichD
2002-12-14 19:04:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
JanRwl@A...
2002-12-14 20:21:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
Ian W. Wright
2002-12-17 02:17:50 UTC
Re: EDM
Steve
2002-12-17 07:47:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM