Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
Posted by
JanRwl@A...
on 2002-12-13 09:55:23 UTC
In a message dated 12/13/2002 2:18:19 AM Central Standard Time,
elson@... writes:
for this detail of which you speak, but the "bubbling and explosions" at the
"cut", seems to me, would be considerably altered by a considerable
"atmospheric" pressure-change where the EDM-vessel was being used. It seems
that said "boiling" would be considerably-reduced (tinier bubbles, or none!)
if the process were done under TWO or more atmospheres of ambient pressure!
Note the "black smoker vents" at the bottom of the ocean in those PBS
educational shows: There is NO "steam", yet the temperature of the water
directly IN those jets is 1400°, as that is many hundreds of feet below the
surface of the sea! So, EDM done under high pressure migh, say, result in a
VERY smooth (polished?) "cut-surface"? Some one "in here" into experimenting
oughta TRY this! I see a potential market for "containment vessels" for
EDM'ers, etc... Hmmm...
Jan R.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
elson@... writes:
> My question: Would there be any good benefit if the EDM work-Same topic: I never DID any EDM work, so really don't have much of a "feel"
> >electrode system were placed in a lowered pressure environment?
for this detail of which you speak, but the "bubbling and explosions" at the
"cut", seems to me, would be considerably altered by a considerable
"atmospheric" pressure-change where the EDM-vessel was being used. It seems
that said "boiling" would be considerably-reduced (tinier bubbles, or none!)
if the process were done under TWO or more atmospheres of ambient pressure!
Note the "black smoker vents" at the bottom of the ocean in those PBS
educational shows: There is NO "steam", yet the temperature of the water
directly IN those jets is 1400°, as that is many hundreds of feet below the
surface of the sea! So, EDM done under high pressure migh, say, result in a
VERY smooth (polished?) "cut-surface"? Some one "in here" into experimenting
oughta TRY this! I see a potential market for "containment vessels" for
EDM'ers, etc... Hmmm...
Jan R.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-19 23:19:54 UTC
EDM
George Potter
1999-06-20 06:41:08 UTC
Re: EDM
Pete Jarman
1999-06-20 10:41:25 UTC
Re: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-21 07:43:01 UTC
Re: EDM
psp@x...
1999-06-21 08:51:38 UTC
Re: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-16 15:37:43 UTC
Re: EDM
TADGUNINC@x...
1999-07-16 18:11:51 UTC
Re: EDM
Scott Acorn
1999-07-17 17:07:53 UTC
Re: EDM
Scott Acorn
1999-07-17 18:09:08 UTC
Re: EDM
Jon Anderson
1999-07-17 18:14:31 UTC
Re: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-18 15:26:09 UTC
RE: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-18 15:32:47 UTC
RE: EDM
Mo
1999-07-18 14:41:03 UTC
Re: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-18 17:22:08 UTC
RE: EDM
J Catmull
1999-07-28 08:06:45 UTC
Re: EDM
Brian Fairey
2000-02-16 16:36:26 UTC
EDM
Jon Elson
2000-02-16 22:03:02 UTC
Re: EDM
tommy40010
2002-12-03 05:58:56 UTC
EDM
Jon Elson
2002-12-03 10:33:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
Tommy Sullivan
2002-12-03 16:13:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
Jon Elson
2002-12-13 00:17:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
JanRwl@A...
2002-12-13 09:55:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2002-12-13 10:23:49 UTC
Re: EDM
wanliker@a...
2002-12-13 16:37:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
Steve
2002-12-13 22:24:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM
Hoyt McKagen
2002-12-14 04:47:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM
wanliker@a...
2002-12-14 08:46:54 UTC
EDM
wanliker@a...
2002-12-14 09:18:10 UTC
EDM
Jay Hayes
2002-12-14 10:27:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
JanRwl@A...
2002-12-14 18:36:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
RichD
2002-12-14 19:04:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
JanRwl@A...
2002-12-14 20:21:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
Ian W. Wright
2002-12-17 02:17:50 UTC
Re: EDM
Steve
2002-12-17 07:47:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM