Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-12-13 00:17:14 UTC
Richard wrote:
it is incompressible)
may be VERY important for the EDM process. Also, the ability of the
fluid to cool
the pieces and carry away debris is important. The EDM spark causes a
small explosion
underwater (or whatever the fluid) and this explosion, or the cavitation
that follows
are part of the process that breaks down the metal.
Arcing or corona at low pressure in gases is an entirely different
process. Plasm etching
is a VERY useful process for the removal of non-conductive materials,
like composites.
But, that is very different in a number of ways.
Jon
>Back in the 1950's I did some mil spec testing to qualify electricalI doubt it. I think that the vaporization of the liquid (and the fact
>components for possible use in aircraft. Some tests were done at an
>atmospheric pressure equivalent to 55,000 feet altitude. Sparking
>across insulating gaps took place at lower voltage levels and longer
>insulating paths were needed to counter this.
>
>My question: Would there be any good benefit if the EDM work-
>electrode system were placed in a lowered pressure environment? Could
>we see lower voltage discharges and faster cutting? Would it be worth
>the effort? Richard
>
>
it is incompressible)
may be VERY important for the EDM process. Also, the ability of the
fluid to cool
the pieces and carry away debris is important. The EDM spark causes a
small explosion
underwater (or whatever the fluid) and this explosion, or the cavitation
that follows
are part of the process that breaks down the metal.
Arcing or corona at low pressure in gases is an entirely different
process. Plasm etching
is a VERY useful process for the removal of non-conductive materials,
like composites.
But, that is very different in a number of ways.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-19 23:19:54 UTC
EDM
George Potter
1999-06-20 06:41:08 UTC
Re: EDM
Pete Jarman
1999-06-20 10:41:25 UTC
Re: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-21 07:43:01 UTC
Re: EDM
psp@x...
1999-06-21 08:51:38 UTC
Re: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-16 15:37:43 UTC
Re: EDM
TADGUNINC@x...
1999-07-16 18:11:51 UTC
Re: EDM
Scott Acorn
1999-07-17 17:07:53 UTC
Re: EDM
Scott Acorn
1999-07-17 18:09:08 UTC
Re: EDM
Jon Anderson
1999-07-17 18:14:31 UTC
Re: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-18 15:26:09 UTC
RE: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-18 15:32:47 UTC
RE: EDM
Mo
1999-07-18 14:41:03 UTC
Re: EDM
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-18 17:22:08 UTC
RE: EDM
J Catmull
1999-07-28 08:06:45 UTC
Re: EDM
Brian Fairey
2000-02-16 16:36:26 UTC
EDM
Jon Elson
2000-02-16 22:03:02 UTC
Re: EDM
tommy40010
2002-12-03 05:58:56 UTC
EDM
Jon Elson
2002-12-03 10:33:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
Tommy Sullivan
2002-12-03 16:13:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
Jon Elson
2002-12-13 00:17:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
JanRwl@A...
2002-12-13 09:55:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2002-12-13 10:23:49 UTC
Re: EDM
wanliker@a...
2002-12-13 16:37:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
Steve
2002-12-13 22:24:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM
Hoyt McKagen
2002-12-14 04:47:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM
wanliker@a...
2002-12-14 08:46:54 UTC
EDM
wanliker@a...
2002-12-14 09:18:10 UTC
EDM
Jay Hayes
2002-12-14 10:27:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
JanRwl@A...
2002-12-14 18:36:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
RichD
2002-12-14 19:04:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
JanRwl@A...
2002-12-14 20:21:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM
Ian W. Wright
2002-12-17 02:17:50 UTC
Re: EDM
Steve
2002-12-17 07:47:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM