CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM

Posted by Jon Elson
on 2002-12-13 00:17:14 UTC
Richard wrote:

>Back in the 1950's I did some mil spec testing to qualify electrical
>components for possible use in aircraft. Some tests were done at an
>atmospheric pressure equivalent to 55,000 feet altitude. Sparking
>across insulating gaps took place at lower voltage levels and longer
>insulating paths were needed to counter this.
>
>My question: Would there be any good benefit if the EDM work-
>electrode system were placed in a lowered pressure environment? Could
>we see lower voltage discharges and faster cutting? Would it be worth
>the effort? Richard
>
>
I doubt it. I think that the vaporization of the liquid (and the fact
it is incompressible)
may be VERY important for the EDM process. Also, the ability of the
fluid to cool
the pieces and carry away debris is important. The EDM spark causes a
small explosion
underwater (or whatever the fluid) and this explosion, or the cavitation
that follows
are part of the process that breaks down the metal.

Arcing or corona at low pressure in gases is an entirely different
process. Plasm etching
is a VERY useful process for the removal of non-conductive materials,
like composites.
But, that is very different in a number of ways.

Jon

Discussion Thread

Tim Goldstein 1999-06-19 23:19:54 UTC EDM George Potter 1999-06-20 06:41:08 UTC Re: EDM Pete Jarman 1999-06-20 10:41:25 UTC Re: EDM Tim Goldstein 1999-06-21 07:43:01 UTC Re: EDM psp@x... 1999-06-21 08:51:38 UTC Re: EDM Tim Goldstein 1999-07-16 15:37:43 UTC Re: EDM TADGUNINC@x... 1999-07-16 18:11:51 UTC Re: EDM Scott Acorn 1999-07-17 17:07:53 UTC Re: EDM Scott Acorn 1999-07-17 18:09:08 UTC Re: EDM Jon Anderson 1999-07-17 18:14:31 UTC Re: EDM Tim Goldstein 1999-07-18 15:26:09 UTC RE: EDM Tim Goldstein 1999-07-18 15:32:47 UTC RE: EDM Mo 1999-07-18 14:41:03 UTC Re: EDM Tim Goldstein 1999-07-18 17:22:08 UTC RE: EDM J Catmull 1999-07-28 08:06:45 UTC Re: EDM Brian Fairey 2000-02-16 16:36:26 UTC EDM Jon Elson 2000-02-16 22:03:02 UTC Re: EDM tommy40010 2002-12-03 05:58:56 UTC EDM Jon Elson 2002-12-03 10:33:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM Tommy Sullivan 2002-12-03 16:13:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM Jon Elson 2002-12-13 00:17:14 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM JanRwl@A... 2002-12-13 09:55:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM turbulatordude <davemucha@j... 2002-12-13 10:23:49 UTC Re: EDM wanliker@a... 2002-12-13 16:37:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM Steve 2002-12-13 22:24:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM Hoyt McKagen 2002-12-14 04:47:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM wanliker@a... 2002-12-14 08:46:54 UTC EDM wanliker@a... 2002-12-14 09:18:10 UTC EDM Jay Hayes 2002-12-14 10:27:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM JanRwl@A... 2002-12-14 18:36:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM RichD 2002-12-14 19:04:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM JanRwl@A... 2002-12-14 20:21:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM Ian W. Wright 2002-12-17 02:17:50 UTC Re: EDM Steve 2002-12-17 07:47:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM