Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards and "Static" rant
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-11-26 23:24:04 UTC
ballendo@... wrote:
practice 'invisible' static protection strategies that they themselves are
no longer aware they are doing! Doing all your work on a metal bench,
with a grounded soldering iron, and keeping one elbow on the bench
pretty much all the time will do a lot to reduce static damage.
any component. It might not damage a unit with proper high-energy
static protection on all external terminals. There is a standard called
the 'human body model', which is approximated by a resistor and a
capacitor. You charge the cap up to increasing voltages, and apply
the testing device to it both by very slow approach and by rapid
approach leading to a 'pop' discharge. When the device is destroyed,
you then have determined its tolerance level. Maxim has some
RS-232 transmitter and receiver chips that are tested to +/- 15 KV
with the human body model, which means these chips also have to
withstand currents to several amperes on a single pin!
most of this trouble. The first thing is to never walk up to a bench
or table and just grab a component, board, or whatever. First, you
touch the bench or table, and let static discharge for a second or so.
(Obviously, a metal table helps.)
Jon
> Mariss,Possibly over hyped, but it may also be that experienced people
>
> Not really sure I want to get into this :-)
>
> So are you saying that, based on your experience (of many thousands
> of parts handled vs. product problems) that static control measures
> are unnecessary? Or over-hyped? Or both?
practice 'invisible' static protection strategies that they themselves are
no longer aware they are doing! Doing all your work on a metal bench,
with a grounded soldering iron, and keeping one elbow on the bench
pretty much all the time will do a lot to reduce static damage.
> I am willing to learn here, but some of this just doesn't make sense.The 1/2" spark, especially if you can hear it, will definitely blitz almost
> Am I to believe that the days' conditions (humidity, etc.) which let
> me "pull" a 1/2 inch spark to the doorknob is of no consequence to my
> electronic parts?!? Because they have intrinsic protection diodes?!?
any component. It might not damage a unit with proper high-energy
static protection on all external terminals. There is a standard called
the 'human body model', which is approximated by a resistor and a
capacitor. You charge the cap up to increasing voltages, and apply
the testing device to it both by very slow approach and by rapid
approach leading to a 'pop' discharge. When the device is destroyed,
you then have determined its tolerance level. Maxim has some
RS-232 transmitter and receiver chips that are tested to +/- 15 KV
with the human body model, which means these chips also have to
withstand currents to several amperes on a single pin!
> P.S. If what you are saying is true, it will really help me! I haveThere are techniques that are quite simple to set up that prevent
> often "put off" electronic assembly due to weather conditions...
most of this trouble. The first thing is to never walk up to a bench
or table and just grab a component, board, or whatever. First, you
touch the bench or table, and let static discharge for a second or so.
(Obviously, a metal table helps.)
Jon
Discussion Thread
jmw@c...
2000-11-25 23:55:35 UTC
Cleaning Circuit Boards
Wally K
2000-11-26 00:17:50 UTC
Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards
Don
2000-11-26 03:32:33 UTC
Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards
Mariss Freimanis
2000-11-26 08:19:17 UTC
Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards
dave engvall
2000-11-26 08:33:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards
Mariss Freimanis
2000-11-26 09:01:46 UTC
Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards
Bertho Boman
2000-11-26 09:11:37 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards
R. T. Robbins
2000-11-26 09:59:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cleaning Circuit Boards
Smoke
2000-11-26 11:08:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards
Smoke
2000-11-26 11:10:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards
Mariss Freimanis
2000-11-26 11:14:23 UTC
Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2000-11-26 11:38:53 UTC
Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards
Wally K
2000-11-26 11:59:10 UTC
Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards
Charles Gallo
2000-11-26 14:28:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards
Chris Hellyar
2000-11-26 16:21:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards
Chris Hellyar
2000-11-26 16:21:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards
Mariss Freimanis
2000-11-26 17:36:48 UTC
Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards and "Static" rant
Smoke
2000-11-26 17:44:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards and "Static" rant
Spehro Pefhany
2000-11-26 17:50:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards and "Static" rant
Lee Studley
2000-11-26 17:51:50 UTC
Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards
Mariss Freimanis
2000-11-26 17:58:56 UTC
Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards and "Static" rant
Mariss Freimanis
2000-11-26 18:07:57 UTC
Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards and "Static" rant
Spehro Pefhany
2000-11-26 18:21:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards and "Static" rant
ballendo@y...
2000-11-26 18:36:40 UTC
Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards and "Static" rant
Jeff Barlow
2000-11-26 19:18:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards and "Static" rant
Mariss Freimanis
2000-11-26 20:08:32 UTC
Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards and "Static" rant
Spehro Pefhany
2000-11-26 20:32:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards and "Static" rant
Jon Elson
2000-11-26 23:14:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards and "Static" rant
Jon Elson
2000-11-26 23:24:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards and "Static" rant
Jon Elson
2000-11-27 00:08:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cleaning Circuit Boards
Chris Hellyar
2000-11-27 00:21:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards and "Static" rant
Dick Ganderton
2000-11-27 16:29:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards
Garry and Maxine
2000-12-15 17:46:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cleaning Circuit Boards and "Static" rant