Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux
Posted by
Steve Smith
on 2001-11-29 18:59:29 UTC
Did you install over the top? This is prone to many problems from what I hear.
How about reformatting the disk and starting over?
Steve Smith
dlantz@... wrote:
How about reformatting the disk and starting over?
Steve Smith
dlantz@... wrote:
> well, no, linux WILL boot on this machine, NO, there are no memory problems
> with this machine. the main issues with win2000 on this machine are out of
> my knowledge... er... i mean, when i got this job, the machine was unstable,
> after trying to fix problem after problem, i finally decided to reload...
> now it turns out the guy i was replacing had pirated win2000, so i installed
> win98. one of the main issues SEEMED to be that there was some strange
> upgrade that had happened from win98 to winME and then to win2000, with
> pieces of those systems still hanging around... AND it was still using the
> old filesystem! yes, ive had good luck with vmware, but with 98lite
> (running the 95 shell)
> the other bad experience i had with win2000 was when i was sent away for
> training. the classroom was full of win2000 computers in pentium 3's... the
> instructor went on and on about win2000's stability, but 2 hours into it, my
> computer froze up solid, as it did two more times before that class was
> over. NOW, this only happened to one other person, out of probably 15
> people... so i guess that is more stable then win98! my experience with NT
> took years off my life, so i dont want to revisite--gotta work now---Dave L.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Elson [mailto:elson@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:20 PM
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux
>
> dlantz@... wrote:
>
> > just to add a small note (my 2 cents) windows 95 is probably the most
> > stable of the lot... BUT is missing some stuff that windows 98 has. the
> > best luck for stability i have found is running 98LITE, which gives you
> the
> > option of not installing stuff in windows98, and you can also install the
> 95
> > shell instead of the 'web-intigrated' desktop, which is a source for alot
> of
> > the instablity. find it at www.98lite.com . windows2000 WAS on this
> > computer here at work, after struggling with it going into 'debug' mode
> and
> > never comming out 5 times a day (not exagerating here), i wiped the drive
> > and installed 98... (sigh) which is now becoming unstable as well... many
> > people have told me 2000 is much more stable then 98 or ME... but all of
> my
> > expeiences (a someewhat limited number) have been bad. stability, with
> > windows ease of installation? look into LINDOWS, at www.lindows.com it
> > should come out early next year. also try wine (stands for wine is not an
> > emulator) or vmware or win4lin... all good options to use microsoft
> > software, or hardware that currently only works with windows--- OK, that
> was
> > more like 5 cents... but thats ok----Dave L.
>
> My guess is Linux won't even boot on your machine. if Windows 2000
> is unstable, you are almost guaranteed to have hardware (probably
> memory) problems. I am running a demanding CAD package in Win2000
> on a Linux system using VMware - it is very impressive, and the whole
> contraption is stable, too!
>
> Jon
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
> Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
> Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Discussion Thread
Ethan Vos
2001-11-27 06:18:21 UTC
Windoze - Linux
dlantz@a...
2001-11-27 06:26:50 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux
Bill Vance
2001-11-27 10:10:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux
Bert Pirson
2001-11-27 10:24:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux
Jon Elson
2001-11-27 10:45:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-11-27 11:20:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux
Marcus & Eva
2001-11-27 18:56:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux
Steve Smith
2001-11-27 20:04:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux
Steve Smith
2001-11-27 20:06:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux
Bill Vance
2001-11-27 21:56:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux
dlantz@a...
2001-11-28 05:09:38 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux
dlantz@a...
2001-11-28 05:15:29 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux
Ian Wright
2001-11-28 09:56:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux
Steve Smith
2001-11-28 20:23:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux
Jon Elson
2001-11-28 23:15:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux
dlantz@a...
2001-11-29 05:09:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux
Jon Elson
2001-11-29 09:00:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux
Steve Smith
2001-11-29 18:59:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux
dlantz@a...
2001-11-30 05:18:30 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windoze - Linux