Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc with camtronics more help please
Posted by
Paul
on 2001-12-11 12:42:35 UTC
Hi Jon
The metric/imperial conversions use a constant of 0.03937...... (to 18
decimal places). By the time any cumulative errors have got large enough to
be an issue, we'd probably be past caring.
Regards, Paul.
The metric/imperial conversions use a constant of 0.03937...... (to 18
decimal places). By the time any cumulative errors have got large enough to
be an issue, we'd probably be past caring.
Regards, Paul.
On Tuesday 11 December 2001 6:11 pm, Jon Elson wrote:
> Note that, internally, EMC uses metric units. So, there is a tiny
> bit of NON-cumulative error in the placement of extremely small
> moves. Also, you can't really expect any machine less than a
> DeVlieg jig bore to actually make repeatable moves in this range.
>
> Are you talking about displayed position on the screen? then it
> most certainly is the conversion to mm and back to inches.
Discussion Thread
bgroover1
2001-12-11 04:48:35 UTC
emc with camtronics more help please
Bill Vance
2001-12-11 07:36:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc with camtronics more help please
bgroover1
2001-12-11 08:34:07 UTC
Re: emc with camtronics more help please
Graham Hollis
2001-12-11 09:31:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc with camtronics more help please
verizon
2001-12-11 09:39:34 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc with camtronics more help please
Jon Elson
2001-12-11 10:05:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc with camtronics more help please
Jon Elson
2001-12-11 10:15:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc with camtronics more help please
chewy8833
2001-12-11 10:31:05 UTC
Re: emc with camtronics more help please
chewy8833
2001-12-11 10:38:27 UTC
Re: emc with camtronics more help please
Paul
2001-12-11 12:42:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc with camtronics more help please
bgroover1
2001-12-11 13:13:41 UTC
Re: emc with camtronics more help please
chewy8833
2001-12-11 17:07:28 UTC
Re: emc with camtronics more help please
Ray
2001-12-12 07:38:35 UTC
Re: emc with camtronics more help please
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2001-12-12 09:24:36 UTC
Why EMC?
dlantz@a...
2001-12-12 09:33:38 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Why EMC?
Jon Elson
2001-12-12 10:23:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Why EMC?
Ian Wright
2001-12-12 12:00:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Why EMC?
Alex Canale
2001-12-12 12:08:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Knee Mill
Corey
2001-12-12 12:24:32 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Knee Mill
Alex Canale
2001-12-12 12:36:04 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Knee Mill
Paul
2001-12-12 13:08:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Why EMC?
chewy8833
2001-12-12 13:26:50 UTC
Re: Why EMC?
fast1994gto
2001-12-12 17:49:31 UTC
Re: Why EMC?
Steve Smith
2001-12-12 20:35:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why EMC?
Jon Elson
2001-12-12 23:29:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why EMC?
Alex Canale
2001-12-13 05:36:05 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Where can I find a copy of EMC?
dlantz@a...
2001-12-13 05:44:33 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Where can I find a copy of EMC?
bgroover1
2001-12-13 05:53:37 UTC
Re: emc with camtronics more help please
Roland Friestad
2001-12-13 06:08:13 UTC
RE: CNC Knee Mill
M Doogan
2001-12-13 08:48:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc with camtronics more help please
verizon
2001-12-13 09:52:03 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc with camtronics more help please
Paul
2001-12-13 12:01:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why EMC?
Steve Smith
2001-12-13 19:04:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why EMC?
Steve Smith
2001-12-13 19:13:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why EMC?
Ray
2001-12-14 08:15:27 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Why EMC?
Steve Smith
2001-12-14 19:19:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Why EMC?