Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Posted by
Fitch R. Williams
on 2002-01-17 06:44:45 UTC
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 07:10:27 +0000, Jon Elson <elson@...>
wrote:
This sounds like a wonderful capability. I have some projects coming up
where that capability would be a huge help. However I get nervous
speculating on what happens if there is a mismatch between feed rate and
rpm? I don't have a good accurate way to set spindle rpm - although I
could probably adapt one of Sphero's digital tachs to my spindle some
way if I had to. The mill spindle has a variable speed pulley with hand
crank, and to complicate things (add uncertainty) it is fed from a VFD,
and the speed has to be manually adjusted each time it is turned on -
the Anilam control I have doesn't have a spindle on-off output, not even
a contact closure other than from the big red panic button (darn it).
I can do the basic arithmetic to calculate what tap rpm and feed rates
would go together, and what the hole depth would be, etc., that's not
the issue.
My concern is for the following situations when using a tapping
attachment like you listed on The Animal:
Case 1: This seems like the worst case. Spindle RPM is slower (for
whatever reason) than the tap needs to keep up with the selected feed
rate. In this case the spindle will over run the tap and push (hard) on
the tap. It might damage something.
Case 2: RPM is faster than the tap needs to keep up with the feed rate.
In this condition, the tap will gain on the spindle - the tap will pull.
I would think that if this is the case the tapping head would reverse or
disengage (?) momentarily then re-engage and keep tapping.
Case 3 is when spindle speed and feed match, but that one takes care of
itself of course.
With that as a background, I have some question and would be interested
in your experience with this. The questions are: Does case 2 work as I
described? If so, do you always make sure your spindle is a bit faster
than required so that you are operating as described in case 2? If so,
how much faster?
Fitch
wrote:
>I use a Procunier "CNC" tapping head, that has clutches andJon,
>gears to drive the tap forward when down feed pressure is applied,
>and reverses the tap at 2 X spindle speed when upward pressure
>is applied. The spindle of the CNC machine controls depth.
>I use Alum-Tap when tapping in aluminum, it works amazingly
>well.
This sounds like a wonderful capability. I have some projects coming up
where that capability would be a huge help. However I get nervous
speculating on what happens if there is a mismatch between feed rate and
rpm? I don't have a good accurate way to set spindle rpm - although I
could probably adapt one of Sphero's digital tachs to my spindle some
way if I had to. The mill spindle has a variable speed pulley with hand
crank, and to complicate things (add uncertainty) it is fed from a VFD,
and the speed has to be manually adjusted each time it is turned on -
the Anilam control I have doesn't have a spindle on-off output, not even
a contact closure other than from the big red panic button (darn it).
I can do the basic arithmetic to calculate what tap rpm and feed rates
would go together, and what the hole depth would be, etc., that's not
the issue.
My concern is for the following situations when using a tapping
attachment like you listed on The Animal:
Case 1: This seems like the worst case. Spindle RPM is slower (for
whatever reason) than the tap needs to keep up with the selected feed
rate. In this case the spindle will over run the tap and push (hard) on
the tap. It might damage something.
Case 2: RPM is faster than the tap needs to keep up with the feed rate.
In this condition, the tap will gain on the spindle - the tap will pull.
I would think that if this is the case the tapping head would reverse or
disengage (?) momentarily then re-engage and keep tapping.
Case 3 is when spindle speed and feed match, but that one takes care of
itself of course.
With that as a background, I have some question and would be interested
in your experience with this. The questions are: Does case 2 work as I
described? If so, do you always make sure your spindle is a bit faster
than required so that you are operating as described in case 2? If so,
how much faster?
Fitch
Discussion Thread
gm4t
2002-01-15 21:27:50 UTC
General Tool Life Question
Jon Elson
2002-01-15 22:13:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] General Tool Life Question
Ian Wright
2002-01-16 01:47:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] General Tool Life Question
yethdear0
2002-01-16 03:34:27 UTC
Re: General Tool Life Question
Sven Peter
2002-01-16 04:58:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] General Tool Life Question
Mike Chaney
2002-01-16 05:09:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] General Tool Life Question
doug98105
2002-01-16 07:12:50 UTC
Re: General Tool Life Question
Tim Goldstein
2002-01-16 07:35:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Deon Styger
2002-01-16 07:52:06 UTC
RE: General Tool Life Question
Marcus & Eva
2002-01-16 08:32:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
gm4t
2002-01-16 09:01:30 UTC
Re: General Tool Life Question
Smoke
2002-01-16 09:33:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] General Tool Life Question
Ian Wright
2002-01-16 09:33:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Smoke
2002-01-16 09:45:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
gm4t
2002-01-16 09:57:09 UTC
Re: General Tool Life Question
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-01-16 10:27:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] General Tool Life Question
Jon Elson
2002-01-16 10:29:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Jon Elson
2002-01-16 10:34:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Tim
2002-01-16 10:42:33 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Drew Rogge
2002-01-16 10:45:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Les Newell
2002-01-16 10:52:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: General Tool Life Question
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-01-16 11:29:11 UTC
Re: General Tool Life Question
Hugh Currin
2002-01-16 12:16:09 UTC
Re: General Tool Life Question
Hugh Currin
2002-01-16 12:22:48 UTC
Re: General Tool Life Question
JanRwl@A...
2002-01-16 13:30:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Marcus
2002-01-16 14:53:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Hugh Currin
2002-01-16 15:05:46 UTC
Re: General Tool Life Question
Fitch R. Williams
2002-01-16 15:19:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Smoke
2002-01-16 15:26:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Gail & Bryan Harries
2002-01-16 15:55:59 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Marcus
2002-01-16 16:11:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Hugh Currin
2002-01-16 16:25:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Marcus & Eva
2002-01-16 18:42:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Marcus & Eva
2002-01-16 18:52:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Jon Elson
2002-01-16 23:00:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Jon Elson
2002-01-16 23:05:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Jon Elson
2002-01-16 23:11:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Bill Vance
2002-01-16 23:19:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
ballendo
2002-01-17 02:59:55 UTC
spiral FLUTE taps was Re: General Tool Life Question
Sven Peter
2002-01-17 06:28:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Sven Peter
2002-01-17 06:28:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Fitch R. Williams
2002-01-17 06:44:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Jon Anderson
2002-01-17 07:14:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Fitch R. Williams
2002-01-17 09:35:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Jon Elson
2002-01-17 10:54:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Fitch R. Williams
2002-01-17 11:02:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
ballendo
2002-01-17 18:30:18 UTC
cnc tapping Re: General Tool Life Question
Fitch R. Williams
2002-01-17 19:04:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cnc tapping Re: General Tool Life Question
Raymond Heckert
2002-01-17 21:17:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: General Tool Life Question
Ian Wright
2002-01-18 01:58:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cnc tapping Re: General Tool Life Question
Smoke
2002-01-18 08:14:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cnc tapping Re: General Tool Life Question
doug98105
2002-01-18 08:34:26 UTC
cnc tapping Re: General Tool Life Question
Smoke
2002-01-18 08:40:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cnc tapping Re: General Tool Life Question
imserv1
2002-01-18 11:08:19 UTC
cnc tapping Re: General Tool Life Question
stevenson_engineers
2002-01-18 13:28:07 UTC
cnc tapping Re: General Tool Life Question
wanliker@a...
2002-01-18 13:33:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cnc tapping Re: General Tool Life Question
netcom
2002-01-18 13:39:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cnc tapping Re: General Tool Life Question
stevenson_engineers
2002-01-18 13:40:27 UTC
cnc tapping Re: General Tool Life Question
wanliker@a...
2002-01-18 14:15:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cnc tapping Re: General Tool Life Question
wanliker@a...
2002-01-18 14:23:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cnc tapping Re: General Tool Life Question
wanliker@a...
2002-01-18 14:24:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cnc tapping Re: General Tool Life Question
stevenson_engineers
2002-01-18 14:38:41 UTC
cnc tapping Re: General Tool Life Question
stevenson_engineers
2002-01-18 15:08:44 UTC
cnc tapping Re: General Tool Life Question
ballendo
2002-01-19 04:25:02 UTC
cnc tapping
stevenson_engineers
2002-01-19 11:58:06 UTC
Re: cnc tapping & probably the last post.
Raymond Heckert
2002-01-20 13:26:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cnc tapping & probably the last post.
Hugh Currin
2002-01-25 19:16:29 UTC
VMware and Vector 9.3
Fitch R. Williams
2002-01-26 08:17:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] VMware and Vector 9.3
Hugh Currin
2002-01-26 09:19:30 UTC
Re: VMware and Vector 9.3
Gene
2002-02-09 09:53:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] VMware and Vector 9.3
imserv1
2002-02-09 15:47:57 UTC
Re: VMware and Vector 9.3
Bill Vance
2002-02-09 16:34:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VMware and Vector 9.3
Hugh Currin
2002-02-09 16:57:07 UTC
Re: VMware and Vector 9.3
imserv1
2002-02-09 17:44:41 UTC
Re: VMware and Vector 9.3
imserv1
2002-02-09 18:03:53 UTC
Re: VMware and Vector 9.3
Paul
2002-02-09 18:18:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VMware and Vector 9.3
Bill Vance
2002-02-09 20:25:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VMware and Vector 9.3