Another question about leveling/squaring
Posted by
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
on 2002-08-16 11:35:01 UTC
I have recently acquired a Techo-Isel gantry table. It is an older Model
I, and all assembled from bolted-together aluminum extrusions. In the
manual, Techno quotes a flatness of .020" per foot for the table, and
cautions against machining the table itself (rather to use a sacrificial
surface and skim that down.) The basic table is X-Y, and the Z axis bolts
onto T-slots on the X-arriage on the gantry. All motion is nice
ball-on-rod recirculating bearings, and the leadscrews are anti-backlash
ball too. It's driven by size 23 steppers with 2A chopper drives (General
Gontrols).
I'm in a quandry over how to set up this machine. I know that I need to
start from the Y axis and move up, but that's as far as I can wrap my head
around. I don't have a table that is known level with respect to the X-Y
plane, to start. I need to set up the Z axis to be perpendicular to that
theoretical plane, and then set my toolhead up so that its spindle will be
parallel to the Z axis. And that's after I've leveled the base as well as
possible, I assume.
The only thing I can think of to start is to mount up the sacrifical
surface (aluminum tooling plate) and attack it with a "single-point"
tool--i.e. a ball endmill. If I crisscross, spiral, etc. the surface
enough that should produce a plane that is parallel to the X-Y motion
without knowing the state of the Z axis at all (just that I keep it at a
fixed height while I'm doing the machining). I could then put a
machinist's level on that surface and sweep it vertically with the test
indicator in the spindle to set the Z axis perpendicular to it, and then
tram in the spindle.
Is that way out in left field? Am I on any kind of the right track? Or
am I overlooking something really fundamental that I'll end up slapping my
forehead when it's pointed out to me?
Thanks,
Randy
Randy Gordon-Gilmore ,----.___________ ______________ _________________
ProtoTrains // = = === == || == == == = || == == == = == =|
Rio Vista, CA, USA /-O==O------------o==o------------o==o-----------o==o-'
zephyrus@... http://www.prototrains.com
I, and all assembled from bolted-together aluminum extrusions. In the
manual, Techno quotes a flatness of .020" per foot for the table, and
cautions against machining the table itself (rather to use a sacrificial
surface and skim that down.) The basic table is X-Y, and the Z axis bolts
onto T-slots on the X-arriage on the gantry. All motion is nice
ball-on-rod recirculating bearings, and the leadscrews are anti-backlash
ball too. It's driven by size 23 steppers with 2A chopper drives (General
Gontrols).
I'm in a quandry over how to set up this machine. I know that I need to
start from the Y axis and move up, but that's as far as I can wrap my head
around. I don't have a table that is known level with respect to the X-Y
plane, to start. I need to set up the Z axis to be perpendicular to that
theoretical plane, and then set my toolhead up so that its spindle will be
parallel to the Z axis. And that's after I've leveled the base as well as
possible, I assume.
The only thing I can think of to start is to mount up the sacrifical
surface (aluminum tooling plate) and attack it with a "single-point"
tool--i.e. a ball endmill. If I crisscross, spiral, etc. the surface
enough that should produce a plane that is parallel to the X-Y motion
without knowing the state of the Z axis at all (just that I keep it at a
fixed height while I'm doing the machining). I could then put a
machinist's level on that surface and sweep it vertically with the test
indicator in the spindle to set the Z axis perpendicular to it, and then
tram in the spindle.
Is that way out in left field? Am I on any kind of the right track? Or
am I overlooking something really fundamental that I'll end up slapping my
forehead when it's pointed out to me?
Thanks,
Randy
Randy Gordon-Gilmore ,----.___________ ______________ _________________
ProtoTrains // = = === == || == == == = || == == == = == =|
Rio Vista, CA, USA /-O==O------------o==o------------o==o-----------o==o-'
zephyrus@... http://www.prototrains.com
Discussion Thread
bob_santa
2002-08-15 09:11:45 UTC
Aligning Rails (or ways) on CNC router
Bill Vance
2002-08-15 10:32:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Aligning Rails (or ways) on CNC router
Jon Elson
2002-08-15 10:55:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Aligning Rails (or ways) on CNC router
castinggrain
2002-08-15 20:33:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Aligning Rails (or ways) on CNC router
Bill Vance
2002-08-15 21:43:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Aligning Rails (or ways) on CNC router
turbulatordude
2002-08-16 04:01:42 UTC
water level ( was Re: Aligning Rails (or ways) on CNC router
Jon Elson
2002-08-16 10:09:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] water level ( was Re: Aligning Rails (or ways) on CNC router
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-08-16 11:18:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] water level
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-08-16 11:35:01 UTC
Another question about leveling/squaring
mayfieldtm
2002-08-16 11:37:12 UTC
master precision levels
Doug Harrison
2002-08-16 12:55:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] master precision levels
turbulatordude
2002-08-16 15:05:25 UTC
water level ( was Re: Aligning Rails (or ways) on CNC router
bob_santa
2002-08-16 17:35:24 UTC
Re: Aligning Rails (or ways) on CNC router
Jon Elson
2002-08-16 20:53:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] master precision levels
Jon Elson
2002-08-16 21:24:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] water level ( was Re: Aligning Rails (or ways) on CNC router
turbulatordude
2002-08-17 06:03:32 UTC
water level ( was Re: Aligning Rails (or ways) on CNC router
Carlos Guillermo
2002-08-27 11:04:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] master precision levels
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-08-27 17:00:48 UTC
Demise of free Intellicad
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-08-27 17:33:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Demise of free Intellicad
Doug Harrison
2002-08-27 17:34:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] master precision levels
LEW BEST
2002-08-27 18:46:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] master precision levels
studleylee
2002-08-27 20:19:41 UTC
Re: master precision levels
Jeff Hamilton
2002-08-27 20:50:28 UTC
Cutting Glass scales
Dave Lantz
2002-08-28 05:21:30 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Demise of free Intellicad
Kos
2002-08-29 02:36:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Demise of free Intellicad
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-08-29 14:58:53 UTC
BDI question and Knoppix plug
wanliker@a...
2002-08-29 15:22:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BDI question and Knoppix plug
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-08-29 15:33:03 UTC
Re: BDI question and Knoppix plug
William Scalione
2002-08-29 22:26:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BDI question and Knoppix plug
Ian W. Wright
2002-08-30 01:22:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BDI question and Knoppix plug
Ray Henry
2002-08-30 09:07:13 UTC
Re: Re: Re: BDI question and Knoppix plug
Ian W. Wright
2002-08-30 10:43:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: BDI question and Knoppix plug
Bill Vance
2002-08-30 11:55:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BDI question and Knoppix plug
j.guenther
2002-08-30 12:05:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BDI question and Knoppix plug
jmkasunich
2002-08-30 14:21:53 UTC
EMC / BDI / Linux / RTLinux / RTAI confusion
Bill Vance
2002-08-30 14:44:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BDI question and Knoppix plug
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-08-30 22:48:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BDI question and Knoppix plug
Jon Elson
2002-08-30 23:03:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC / BDI / Linux / RTLinux / RTAI confusion
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-08-31 02:15:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: BDI question and Knoppix plug
funcadem
2003-07-22 02:43:07 UTC
Re: Re: BDI question and Knoppix plug
Paul
2003-07-22 10:05:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: BDI question and Knoppix plug
funcadem
2003-07-22 13:13:53 UTC
Re: BDI question and Knoppix plug
funcadem
2003-07-22 13:20:30 UTC
Re: BDI question and Knoppix plug
Paul
2003-07-22 13:36:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BDI question and Knoppix plug