Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Posted by
Art
on 2003-01-21 15:53:21 UTC
Chris:
I get a lot of that still. "Windows can't do CNC", I work on multi million
dollar machines that run under Windows XP and 2000 that control MUCH more
dangerous items than CNC. Try 100,000Volts at 1 amp or more generating
X-Rays, while stepping 10-20 stepper motors around while the X-Rays are
being controlled. The motors revolve radiation units around your head or
generate magnetic fields that can suck your watch off your body. All
controlled by the new standard (Windows XP), even Unix has been dropped by
a great and ever increasing number of companies in the control of large
scale machines. The Future?, Windows...absolutely no question about it...
I don't know a single OEM not trying to get out of DOS for his software
needs. Dos is going the way of the dinosaur very soon. (Can you still buy
it?)
Thanks, (End of OT rant. ) (Sorry Bill)
Art
www.artofcnc.ca
I get a lot of that still. "Windows can't do CNC", I work on multi million
dollar machines that run under Windows XP and 2000 that control MUCH more
dangerous items than CNC. Try 100,000Volts at 1 amp or more generating
X-Rays, while stepping 10-20 stepper motors around while the X-Rays are
being controlled. The motors revolve radiation units around your head or
generate magnetic fields that can suck your watch off your body. All
controlled by the new standard (Windows XP), even Unix has been dropped by
a great and ever increasing number of companies in the control of large
scale machines. The Future?, Windows...absolutely no question about it...
I don't know a single OEM not trying to get out of DOS for his software
needs. Dos is going the way of the dinosaur very soon. (Can you still buy
it?)
Thanks, (End of OT rant. ) (Sorry Bill)
Art
www.artofcnc.ca
Discussion Thread
sparkness2001 <mark@c...
2003-01-21 07:29:46 UTC
windows or dos based NC software
James Owens
2003-01-21 12:41:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Art
2003-01-21 14:23:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
CL
2003-01-21 15:23:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Art
2003-01-21 15:53:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
James Owens
2003-01-21 16:01:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
James Cullins
2003-01-21 17:01:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
zestronad54529 <dpeter@n...
2003-01-21 17:49:56 UTC
Re: windows or dos based NC software
Jack Coats
2003-01-21 17:59:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Jack Coats
2003-01-21 17:59:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Les Watts
2003-01-21 18:00:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: windows or dos based NC software
James Owens
2003-01-21 18:04:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2003-01-21 18:22:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2003-01-21 18:22:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2003-01-21 18:31:31 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
CL
2003-01-21 21:59:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Hans Wedemeyer
2003-01-22 06:42:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Ray Henry
2003-01-22 06:49:36 UTC
Re: RE: windows or dos based NC software
sparkness2001 <mark@c...
2003-01-22 07:14:08 UTC
Re: windows or dos based NC software
alex
2003-01-22 08:13:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
CL
2003-01-22 10:11:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: windows or dos based NC software
Fred Smith <imserv@v...
2003-01-22 17:04:14 UTC
Re: windows or dos based NC software
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-01-23 05:41:14 UTC
DeskCNC limitations was Re: windows or dos based NC software
Fred Smith <imserv@v...
2003-01-23 15:35:23 UTC
DeskCNC Capabilities
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-01-24 06:25:21 UTC
Re: DeskCNC Capabilities