Re: DeskCNC Capabilities
Posted by
ballendo <ballendo@y...
on 2003-01-24 06:25:21 UTC
Fred,
Thank you for the update. I wrongly assumed that since DeskNC was so
limited, that DeskCNC would be also...
Will look forward to the ability to use unequal Arc axis SPMM.
Ballendo
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Fred Smith <imserv@v...>"
<imserv@v...> wrote:
Thank you for the update. I wrongly assumed that since DeskNC was so
limited, that DeskCNC would be also...
Will look forward to the ability to use unequal Arc axis SPMM.
Ballendo
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Fred Smith <imserv@v...>"
<imserv@v...> wrote:
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "ballendo <ballendo@y...>"either
> <ballendo@y...> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Two things to know about DeskCNC:
> >
> > Steps must be integer units, 1996.76 SPI is not allowed. You
> > use 1996, or 1997 in this example...number
> >
>
> This has never been the case for DeskCNC.
>
> The scaling of the steps and microsteps is calculated in terms of
> steps per mm, out to about 5 or 6 decimals.
>
> >
> > And possibly more important: Both X and Y must have the same
> > of steps per unit for arcs to work.the
> >
>
> This is still an advertised requirement. Arcs presently require
> same scaling in X and Y axis. This means the same pitch, gearing,axis.
> and steps/rev ratios on X and Y. Will probably change soon. The
> most common type of machine using different X & Y ratios seem to be
> CNC routers/plasma with a long X compared to a much shorter Y
> These tend to need higher topend speeds as well as well. 150-200ipm
> vs 15-25 ipm for milling steel and aluminum.axis.
>
> Fanout on all axes is 25 ma/ea. Can only drive one Gecko per
> Slaved A axis to X is also in the works for machines with two Xaxis
> motors.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Fred Smith - IMService
Discussion Thread
sparkness2001 <mark@c...
2003-01-21 07:29:46 UTC
windows or dos based NC software
James Owens
2003-01-21 12:41:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Art
2003-01-21 14:23:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
CL
2003-01-21 15:23:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Art
2003-01-21 15:53:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
James Owens
2003-01-21 16:01:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
James Cullins
2003-01-21 17:01:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
zestronad54529 <dpeter@n...
2003-01-21 17:49:56 UTC
Re: windows or dos based NC software
Jack Coats
2003-01-21 17:59:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Jack Coats
2003-01-21 17:59:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Les Watts
2003-01-21 18:00:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: windows or dos based NC software
James Owens
2003-01-21 18:04:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2003-01-21 18:22:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2003-01-21 18:22:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2003-01-21 18:31:31 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
CL
2003-01-21 21:59:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Hans Wedemeyer
2003-01-22 06:42:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
Ray Henry
2003-01-22 06:49:36 UTC
Re: RE: windows or dos based NC software
sparkness2001 <mark@c...
2003-01-22 07:14:08 UTC
Re: windows or dos based NC software
alex
2003-01-22 08:13:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] windows or dos based NC software
CL
2003-01-22 10:11:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: windows or dos based NC software
Fred Smith <imserv@v...
2003-01-22 17:04:14 UTC
Re: windows or dos based NC software
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-01-23 05:41:14 UTC
DeskCNC limitations was Re: windows or dos based NC software
Fred Smith <imserv@v...
2003-01-23 15:35:23 UTC
DeskCNC Capabilities
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-01-24 06:25:21 UTC
Re: DeskCNC Capabilities